CPU : Intel Core i5-13500 and I got and 5950x and runs like crap lol strange. Even the game says I am not in recommended specs even with Amd 5950x 32 GB and SSD with 970 GPU lol my self on this. Bad optimization is my take.
bro need a guide how you playing this using gtx 970? I also downloaded because of this video but i receiving a error that my VRAM is insufficient. please help me..
I have the same card and I'm doing the same settings, but my game mob kinda blink and lag on bigger fights with more mobs on the spot, its only smooth in tight space ........ is there any reason for that or I'm missing some adjustment ?
I have a ryzen 3 3200g gtx 970 16gb ram..... But when i start(launch) the game... Black screen comes up and game crashed to desktop... Please help 🙏🙏🙏(sorry for the bad english)
Hello, how are you, my friend? I can help you, maybe turn off your internet through the Windows settings or disconnect the LAN cable from your PC and try to open the game, see if it works and let me know, if not I can help you in another way
No hyper threading. It probably won't even run sadly. You can upgrade to an i7 3770 or xeon e3 1230 v2 (check your motherboard CPU support list if you go with a xeon) you'll. Be able to get 30-40 fps that way. Xeon is like $15 on eBay. I7 will be double that only because it has integrated graphics (but we don't care about that 😉)
Hello thank you for your video, did you try to play the entire game with this config ? ( i still have an i7 4770k too ) can you keep at least 40 fps when there are a lot of mobs onscreen ?
Unfortunately not. This game is too far down in my backlog. I just did a quick run. If you have a save at a specific location that I can test, I can have a look.
@@toutagamon Just finished the game (solo) and it was very playable ( some drops at 30-35 fps ) but the rest of the time you get 50-55 fps :) excellent game btw
That's as far as I tested my friend. These are mostly proof of concept runs really. I will see if I can retest later on, as the game progresses. This is the work's PC really, lol. The lower setting made it little uglier with some performance gain. Maybe I will need to test with low settings+medium textures. This could work.
@@toutagamon thanks for the answer! getting pretty familiar with making games look uglier to get playable performance having such an old gpu. just hoping space marine 2 runs better than darktide did for me, the occasional drops to 20fps with all minimum setting, 720p resolution and fsr ultra performance was a rough time.
Thanks for making this video, just wanted to see if my GTX 970 can even run this game:DD I know i need to buy a better graphics card, but haven't had the resources for that lately. But yeah cheers mate!
Well, truth be told it is a 10yo card. Still runs lots of stuff though. For me it's one of the best and most loved of my cards, that's why I keep showing games on it.
@@toutagamon Yeah:D Got back to gaming 2 years ago and bought this pc from a friend for 170 bucks, I've updated it a little but haven't gotten to the most expensive parts yet. Need to start looking in to the current most cost-effective parts so I can enjoy these newer games, without worrying can my pc handle them:D
The rx6600 is not a 1080p ultra card in general. It's more like medium/high, especially when it comes to the new UE5 games as you can see in this video. The cpu itself, is fine. Medium/high does not mean bad. Ultra settings often have ridiculous demands for diminishing returns.
@@MonchoZhelyazkov You should visit the gamegpu site, which tests many games all the time and see their 1080p results. Some games are extremely heavy at ultra and there can be no direct answer. I have a 3060ti and it is doing a good job at 1080p, certainly not ultra though. If I would be getting a high caliber 1080p card nowadays, I would get a 4070 and I am not even joking.
nicee video bro i have i7 3370k and rx 6700xt 32gb ram and run hellbalde 2 with 2k mid -high setting 45-50fps and cant run this game buz of AVX2 😫😫Its a unfinished lazy game
The hdd4 osd metric, is showing what kind of reading the hdd is doing. It is pretty manageable. However, having played the game from start to finish, I'd say a ssd is preferable. Especially for fast travels or quick outdoors traversals.
The hdd4 osd metric, is showing what kind of reading the hdd is doing. It is pretty manageable. However, having played the game from start to finish, I'd say a ssd is preferable. Especially for fast travels or quick outdoors traversals.
Is the low fps because of the HDD, CPU, or both? I watched someone play with the same GPU and higher end CPU and has constant 30+ fps. I have a Ryzen 3 3100 with GTX 1660 Super and we are getting almost the same fps running on HDD.
This is a 13500 mate. A very recent and powerful cpu. There is no way in god's green earth, that this cpu, would limit a 10yo old GTX 970 by any stretch of the imagination. The GTX 1660 super is way more powerful than the GTX 970. In your system, the cpu may have something to do with it. The storage does not affect graphics rendering. It can only cause halts, if the data is not there when requested. Now regarding the other guyes GTX 970 run, maybe he was testing a different location? This initial part is quite heavy.
