Welcome to Space Enthusiast, where we explore the most interesting topics related to Space, Science and Technology!
Our team at Space Enthusiast consists of writers, voice actors, video editors, animation artists and graphic designers. Each video takes days to complete before it is published and shared on RU-vid.
Our videos are not made for academic research or reference. While we guarantee effort and creativity in every video, they are not peer-reviewed and are for entertainment purposes only. Space Enthusiast is not associated with any other channel on RU-vid.
We are always open to feedback or comments about our videos. To contact us, be sure to use our email in the channel details below.
This is bs just you know how the your cycle started you can't just say oh well in that case we don't need to ask how it all started cause that is still the question how did the first cycle of our kosmos start maybe trough another kosmos dying forever maybe cause another komos had to much energy creating a new kosmos in the process but even then wher did that cosmos come from
''We built the universe with ˹great˺ might, and We are certainly expanding it.'' Holy Quran 51:47 ''Before the creation there was only God'' Messenger Muhammed ''I am the Time'' God. These narrations are not fabrications, you can find them in the old books. Especially old scholars didnt understand how is time God, and didnt believe it literally.
We've spent almost a century to find Dark Matter and Dark Energy but still there's no sign of them. Now the Physics Community is desperately struggling to save Dark Matter and Dark Energy because they invested too much time and efforts to these two Dark Ghosts. But...No matter what we do, a thing that doesn't exist cannot be detected even if we can justify its existence mathematically. May be it is time to find an Alternative Way to Explain Dark Matter and Dark Energy. 4-D Hypershere model of Universe can easily explain Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Void and even the reason why the measurement values of Expansion Rate are around 70 km/sec-Mpc. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Void and Antigravity, ... all these are same phenomena. They just look different. I agree to the idea that the interaction between mass and space must be explained with quantum mechanics. But that doesn't mean gravity is the QM phenomena. That's because gravity is not a force. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Antigravity, Void... all these are just joint effects of the expansion of the Universe and the curvature of spacetime. Details are given below. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime. However, we also observe gravitational effects - curvature of spacetime - in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method. An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed - it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime. So, the question is now - why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass? The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system - 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time. The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”. “Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies - regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter. Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows. As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as: Expansion rate = ((d(circumference))/dt)/radiusofuniverse=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/(2π*4233Mpc)=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/26598Mpc=70.82(km⁄s)/Mpc The popularly accepted empirical expansion rate is 73.5 +/- 2.5 km/s/Mpc, so our calculated value is close. There may be some additional source of expansion (or observed red shift) to make up for the discrepancy. For example, if two adjacent points have some gravitational gradient due to non-parallel time arrows, then light passing through these points will be red-shifted. - Cited from www.academia.edu/82481487/Title_Alternative_Explanation_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy
I have never seen any YT video with a thumbnail claiming some new cosmic discovery, but then spend so much time saying ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. First, the BBT was NOT developed to explain the origin of the universe. It was developed to explain Hubble's Law, the red shift (expansion) of the universe co-discovered by Edwin Hubble in the 1920's. Second, if you're going to espouse the so called "multi-verse" hypothesis, please include the disclaimer that there is no PHYSICAL evidence of any such thing. As we learn more and more about the complexity of the universe, and everything in it (especially biological chemistry), the multiverse hypothesis is just a philosophical explanation wrapped in science babble to provide cover for the intellectual bankruptcy of the BBT.
Absolutely fascinating story of about what is going on!!! Proof we are all meaningless bits of dirt.... Almost believable unless you are a flat earther.... then it is just shaman like babble. Now the flat earther perspective confirms each one of us is something very special. We are under a dome or in a cage so to speak. If you want to see something funner than UFC check out the battling debates between flat earthers and globalists!!!! It will surprise the hell out of you how much "evidence" each side has!!! Not to mention how much each side likes to avoid each sides evidence!!!
I think you have this planet confused for another planet. Toi 733b is a water planet, 4.9x larger than earth. Photosynthetic life isn't possible because more hydrogen and no oxygen because of no plant life.
You do realize that Neptune and Pluto were not observed directly when their existence was theorized as well, right? Yet they both exist and have now been observed and studied up close.
This seems to be an actual space science channel, not a conspiracy theory channel. Though the name "Planet IX" does sound like some lizard-people stuff lol
Scientists build telescope to find stuff. It finds stuff. RU-vidr posts, "the telescope just found the mostest, veryest, completely unexpectedest thingy out there, forcing all scientists everywhere to change everything they know about eveything...all the time. Get a grip.
DUDE....this stuff regarding the universe...size age how it happened etc...is all guess work....they dont know the answers to most questions and never will
Assumptions, theories, and myths! Scientists 'think' they know everything, but, their beliefs are riddled with holes! Each one of us will be able to see everything up close in the next life! Be patient; it will be here soon enough!
Light beyond the dark ages? Old brightly massive galaxies, some larger than our own Milky Way but at the edge of the observable universe? How can this be?
Black Holes, Nova etc... we have to say thanks for the existence of this BEAST... eat all to create new stars, planets etc... like a death to create life.
When 95% of the matter/energy budget = I don't know, you know the theory is bunk. 20% is a misunderstanding of gravity in low energy regimes. But "cosmologists" call it a thing that needs to be found. 60 years later, no dark matter. Funnily enough, MOND explains all that and has been around since the 80's. Google Stacy McGaugh at Case Western.
9:10 Columbus didn't sail around the world. This video has clickbait titles and false "information." The graphics have nothing to do with the presentation. I think someone is just trying to make a channel out of AI. I will ban it.
Nice try, but sneakily disguised hints towards some variant of the god of the gaps hypothesis is still a losing proposition in the long run. While the Hubble tension is real, the answer is more science, not more gods.
Our universe is a fractal of a universe 500 times larger than our universe. The Big Bang was when our universe became a fractal of the larger universe.
Time dilation is the answer. The universe is far bigger than scientists think and the future has already been determined. Past present and future all exist simultaneously.
"Science says that there was nothing before the Big Bang, and therefore somehow also there will be nothing after the universe" (Minute 6:05 - 6:13) It is saying that Nothing had the power to create Something, and then it will return to Nothing again, but without power to create Something ever again. My question is, what do the scientists say is the law for this? How can they know that Nothing had a power or the chance to cause Something and that after Something returns to Nothing there will never be that chance or power to cause Something again? Total especuative nonsense without evidence. Because if Nothing could cause Something by whitch law do scientist know that Nothing will be different from before creating Something in that it will be depleted from that causing power?
Universevid endless and infite, BIG BANG wwas a complete nonsense . The Universe consists from varying parts and structures- using in different ways the laws of the nature...
The arrogance !! Aint nothing wrong with the sun. What's wrong with man wicked self, saying and believing anything. Dinosaurs and UFO but nobody speaks of the Flood and reason for the rainbow!
