A channel about Jungian personality type theory (best known through its application in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator), as well as miscellaneous topics in philosophy.
I wrote a book on Jungian type theory! Print version: www.amazon.com/Motes-Beams-Neo-Jungian-Theory-Personality/dp/B089278TWR Ebook: subjectobjectmichaelpierce.blogspot.com/p/buy-my-book.html?m=1
I owe a great debt to IDRLabs.com for my early education in Jungian type theory. Other fundamental resources: Jung's "Psychological Types" chapter 10, and Myer's "Gifts Differing".
There is a one to one translation between MBTI and Socionics based on differing definitions of functions, e.g. Socionics Se = MBTI Ni + Te, which when taken into consideration leads to the following direct translation between the systems: ILE -> ENTP SEI -> INFP ESE -> ENFP LII -> ISTJ EIE -> ESFJ LSI -> ENTJ SLE -> INTJ IEI -> ISFP SEE -> ESTJ ILI -> INTP LIE -> ESFP ESI -> INFJ LSE -> ESTP EII -> ISFJ IEE -> ENFJ SLI -> ISTP If you are any one of the types on the left in Socionics, you can only be the type on the right in MBTI. No exceptions.
Too jumbled . Did not see 16 types of INFJ's but a lot of TALK as if READING from a SCRIPT and not to people , As if this is a JUMP on to MONEY, or Get "LIKES" form everyone who click into your Pod Cast
What's important to keep in mind about abstract conceptual systems such as personality typologies (like Socionics) is that, while they can certainly be fun and interesting, are merely made-up constructs to give us a way of perceiving an inconceivably neuanced phenomena in the real world (like human personality) and a means of communicating it. If it's helpful; great! But it isn't and could never be the absolute. In other words: Don't mistake the map for the territory.
Thank you, algorithm, for bringing up this old gem. I see too many AI-and text-to-speech style informative videos these days; you can really hear the spirit of the narrator in this one
I wouldn't say INTJs are more materialistic and less metaphysical than INTPs. Se inferior compared to Si child is less materialistic. Ni dom compared to Ti dom is more metaphysical. INTJs are more pragmatic in the outer world immediately WITH their knowledge whereas INTP are less pragmatic immediately WITH their knowledge. I would not equate immediate pragmatism with materialism nor delayed pragmatism with 'being metaphysical.' The knowledge itself is likely going to be metaphysical.
Yeah, I'm definitely ISFP. I hear you talk about Si and my brain contorts it trying to understand it like I sometimes can't comprehend how people see things through impressions other than literally what's in front of you. Like I can have memories and experiences that get reminded when I see certain things in the present, but this is like not that deep, it's occasional. I more often than not just see things through Se's scope all the time.
You two are the GOATs of cognitive functions and Jungian typology, looking forward to whatever you guys will co-produce! Greetings from a fan from Greece!
Thank you for stripping away the overly complimentary extreme of many characterizations of this type. I do believe that I am an INFJ, but it has been hard for me to accept as there are too many descriptions out there that seem to pander to a sort of spiritual superiority image of the INFJ. People often forget that Hitler was also an INFJ. INFJ's are more complex and just as capable of being flawed as any other type.
While listening, I had a sudden moment of self-irony, an epiphany of self-awareness. The conversation surpassed my own attentional threshold for abstract digression leading me to comical reflection and empathization. Interesting and typologically useful to watch you guys converse near the limit of your abstractions. Thanks.
It's untrue that INFPs are dreamers, idealists and incapable of pragmatism They can be extremely pragmatic and down to earth as required by daily life, without sacrificing their inner world and values. ENFPs (like INFJs) are frequently far more fantastical, crazy, utopian. Nor do INFPS alway love people. They tend to rather dislike humanity while loving individuals. The opposite of XNFJs who tend to love humanity but dislike individuals.
I view consciousness as something that by design is meant for integration , and specifically the choice made pre-birth to not see objective reality has to do with the desire for source itself to integrate through the individual. You consciousness is not separate from collective consciousness, it is just part of it , but the individual views themselves as separate
ESTP here. Loves it, but have to write all down in order to start memorising. Even understanding at times. English not being my native language made me think this was the reason not getting the stuff at once. Well. Half written down. Getting exhausted at these long, circomvulated sentences. Happily enriching my vocabulary, though. Next step: rewriting all in summarised bulllet points to go to the points. 11:01 "ESTP has little patience for roundabout reasoning and with fact spewing over the tentative introductions of anything that clearly could cut to the chase but isn't gor some reason". WTF 😳😵💫 😁
As an INFJ: you experience a raging emotional outburst while writing; literally raging with anger; yelling at the screen, and typing so fast that a typo appears in every single word -- and then -- you come back to it later with tranquil-like calmness, and are like: "yeah, I think that gets the point across."
> imho You two are doning supre-thing and cross link branches of modern science. You shold talk/write to Sabine Hossenfelder (and other particle physicists, composers and musicians... people who are onto photo-sintesis, notion of time or whatever)
@@johnschultzbarnes3196 I think he is an enfp. In Ops (objective personality) he would be a more introvert enfp in my opinion so that might translate to infp in other systems or entp in some since he has more reflective energy. Just to add, I really like your guys thoughts at the end with quadras style with the hierarchy gamma, duality beta, pentagram delta, quadrant alpha sort of deal.
>> amhmm... about 45' smt like "there it is! right there." So, ho would you consider the moment you say "Ha! There, that tone... that note" ( for examole in music) ... were does it come froma and how does it come to you ... or better yet: Where is it, where it originates? Isn it the same "thing". What if we shift to thoughts and conversation?
I was watching a Bobby Fischer chess game, I realized he looks so much like you Michael! He is typed as an INFJ too. Seems accurate. John is an INTP btw. Being talkative or not has nothing to do here. ENTP is a right wing type. INFJ and INTP are egalitarian, humanitarian, and sensitive to other ppl's wellbeing.
@@AminVassefi I figured your assumptions deserved my assumptions. I guess I was confused about whether assumptions should be shared or not after I read yours..
@@AminVassefi assumptions are statements made without proof, which is what you did by making a claim based on subjective generalizations- with no proof :)
I'm late to the party, but... NE is pinging ideas to SI both their own and others to build up an undertanding of reality. SE is pinging to reality to formulate ideas.
In which state do you live, Michael? I've been subscribed to your channel for years. Is commenting on your RU-vid videos the only way to communicate with you? I do enjoy a good discussion about physics.
Hey Michael :) Could you do a Video on Se/Si and how these functions show up when it comes to sex? Almost no one talks about it and i find that super interesting. Thank you for your Content
