Yeah, those courts are pretty bad. The ones with gray on the outside aren't as bad, but the fully colored ones? I can't watch very long before my eyes hurt.
i want somebody to explain the stupidity of the guy doing the top 10. ok? i mean i get he's involved in a movie or documentary about the top worse blow out (or is that bottom worse blow out) but he's an idiot and everyone else is to. usa wins a world cup game 13-0 and talks about how critical everybody was of it (assuming they thought winning that big in a world cup was disrespetful of your opponents being the issue) but the 31-0 drubbing that was number 1 nobody said a word about and it's ok because now it get's a documentary? ok let's break this down. 13-0 in a world cup vs a fifa world cup qualifier. ok i get the world cups a bigger stage i get that. but unless i'm really bad at math ( and i checked this on a calculator 13-0 is 18 less goals than 31-0. i bet the people running their mouths about the 13-0 also dont 'know much about soccer. i checked the rules. you can only sub 3 players total during a game. so its not like you could pull all your good players and play your back ups the entire second half. unlike basketball, baseball, football as examples. unlike those once you get a big lead theirs only so much u can do. then lets look at the score 13 vs. 31. in soccer you have 90 minutes (2 45 minute halves). to score 31 goals you have to literally score nearly every 3 minutes. 13 goals is one not quite every 7 minutes. again how is 13-0 more of a problem than 31-0? it appears they made at least some effort to not run it up just by not scoring every 3 minutes. then even ignoring all that australia gets the pass and yet htey're perrenially a good team but u.s. has bounced between good and meiocre for years so u.s. is the issue? come on eihter know your facts, use your brains or stf up! even assuming the 10 goals in second hafl were still a bit much, you still have 10 in 45 minutes which breaks down to 1 every 4.5 minutes vs on every less than 3 months. shut up
Good lord these plays are just average. If half the plays are a basic dunk why are they the top plays? I'd be more interested in a chess top 10 plays of the week than this snooze fest. No wonder ESPN is failing
Don't think douglass is saying he can dunk. It's the equivalent of a pro golfer making a 12 ft birdie putt and that being a top play. It's a routine play.
@@outsideropinion6561 meh. They play the lie, the slope and wind. Think it's a valid comparison. What about a running back going up the middle for a 5 yard touchdown? Just as difficult or harder, but not a top play. That is op statement. Routine play. I agree.
Yes, I do. I was brought up to show sportsmanship. There's no glory in defeating a lesser opponent. Jim Brown once said, "Act like you've been there before." after he was asked why he didn't celebrate touchdowns. Feel good about yourself, no need to rub your opponent's face in it. Even Sun-Tzu said, give your opponent a way out, a desperate opponent has nothing to lose, and will defeat you. this "in-your-face" attitude has very much ruined sports for me.@@BLT1617
I assume the show spent some time talking about the fact that the UNC field hockey coach PLAYED in last year's national championship game. She is the youngest coach to win an NCAA championship.
Since when is a dunk not part of a play? The whole idea of basketball is to outscore your opponent. Did that dunk not count as 2 points? Actually THAT dunk counted as 3 points when you consider the foul and point after.
This seems like it's mostly considering just "largest point differentials", when I think there have been way more famous and consequential "blowouts." Germany vs. Brazil 7-1 will be remembered forever, Suns vs. Mavericks game 7 as well, maybe Bills vs. Cowboys in the Superbowl. Teams shitting the bed on the largest stage.
Taika... love you bro, but "Oklahoma" and "Oklahoma State" are not the same thing, only one of those teams won the final Bedlam football game and it wasn't the sooners lol
