worthless channel, worthless video... talking about feeding copper as if that's even close to a consideration... copper bullets are common and perform amazingly well.
I keep my collection pretty light these days.. Light & tight. Rifle and two handguns.. Mini 14 folder, Smith&Wesson 60-15 3" J-frame revolver and a Kimber Ultra carry in .45. Have been meaning to pickup another .22 though.. Probably a ruger MK series with a longer barrel. Not too picky beyond that. I've owned a few of them in the past.
New sub here. Like you, I know a few things because I have seen a few things. I have been saying almost exactly what you just said for many years. I'm sharing your video with everyone I know. USMC 3521 90=94.
A 'core battery' in 100% necessary! .22LR rifle, 9mm/.45ACP handgun, 12 Ga. shotgun, AR in 5.56 mm (mine is a 'self built A2 carbine' version), and a good bolt gun.........My bolt guns are 6.5 Creedmoor and a 7.62x54R Mosin Nagant M91/30 (only because that rifle and ammo is (was), cheap! Along with a stockpile of ammo, and commonly bought 'repair parts' (not accessories), for each firearm. Also learn how to fix your firearms!
The down side of the 270 has always been a lack of good bullet selections, especially if you're going for something bigger than a mule deer, especiallyif you'relimited to factory ammo. If you're able to limit your shots to 300 yds, there are a LOT of cartridges that will give nearly identical results, but there are places where you really need to be able to reach out past 400 yds. In those places are where the 270 has always shined. Both cartridges can take a 400 to 500 lb elk, but they are both pretty marginal for a mature 1,000 lb animal. The 6.5 CM has a better selection of heavy projectiles available, but the velocity is low enough that your range will be limited to the point that a 270 with a partition will be just as effective. If the 270 had a number of 150gr to 175gr options available, and twist rates that would stabilize them, it would walk all over the 6.5 CM, and be a more serious contender for really big animals.
6.5C is not the new 308. The issue is going to be institutional momentum, Nato isnt changing. The bullet tech applies to 308 just as much as it does 6.5. And to call a 6.5 caliber rifle a new idea, well the 6.5 Swedish 6.5 Carcano, 6.5 Mannlicher, and 6.5 Arisaka all existed pre WW1, and we had ample experience with them when we developed the 308. We also had experience with 6mm Lee before we even made 30-06. Further the Japanese noticed the terminal deficiencies of a smaller 6.5mm projectile and shifted to 7.7mm.
Greetings. This was a great video but I have a question, what'd you recommend is the best way for a non-American (I'm Bahamian) to become a private military contractor (not a private security contractor, something like Academi, Triple Canopy, Aegis etc) in an armed capacity? Thank you for your time.
Not sure why this ended up playing on my phone; I didn't even have my youtube open. But thank you for being a way in which the waters flow. I needed it today. Shalom.
