@itzflyboyofficial5533 fewer means a smaller number. 0 is supposed to represent the absence of negative and positive numbers. It represents nothing, not fewer things.
@@johnathanhunter1351 no fewer simply means lower than what you already have. Lets change the example so you understand better. Lets use hours of work. If Mike prefers fewer hours of work and he currently has to work 2 hours , this doesn’t mean once he gets to 1hour he will be okay. The concept of needing fewer implies that you prefer as few as possible so Mike prefers having fewer books(fewer than whatever he is currently having) . This can only stop at 0 when there is nothing left to give up. Sorry for the long text
@itzflyboyofficial5533 Fewer implies she still wants at least 1. Otherwise, she would say she didn't want any. Fewer is less of, not none. I'm being finicky, but words to me are Important. I guess she needs to be more specific!
@@johnathanhunter1351 to me saying fewer makes perfect sense. zero is fewer than 1 and so she prefers zero over one. to say she doesn't want any means that having zero is of highest benefit to her, but doesn't necessarily mean that having one is better than having two. I know it's an old thread but I comment anyways haha
Nice explanation, i think no one except you explained the edgeworth box like this. First you took two individual graph then rotate it and proved how the combined graph actually comes in. Thank you
Hello! I found your video really helpful, however, in my case the total prices of bundels are all the same. Does that mean that warp and sarp are both violated?
Note: At 6:55, I talk about how to check whether your solution is "correct". While it's not really checking, if things don't add up, you do know that you have gone wrong somewhere. Apologies for the wording.
