As ridiculous as ever. Were Allied casualties REALLY eight time Axis casualties in North Africa? Whoever makes these has almost no idea about the facts.
I met a vet who was in Greece a few weeks ago. He said the Germans sent up a plane, they thought it was going to strafe them, but it just wrote a big 51 in the sky instead with smoke. It was Hitler's birthday.
Casualty numbers are way off, and it can only be concluded that there is bias at work here since this stuff is very easy to look up. We can take some known dates on these. - At the start of Operation Compass, on 9 December 1940, the Allies are listed as having lost 21,403 men while the Axis have lost only 3791. But there had been little meaningful combat anywhere at this point; the Greco Italian war was going but had not had huge casualties yet, and what casualties existed were roughly balanced between the two sides. Naval losses might account for some of it, but the Axis were taking naval losses too which don't seem reflected. - By the end of Compass on 9 February 1941, the Axis should have lost at least 15,500 KIA/WIA just from that battle. I assume that POW are for some reason not counted in all this (they would be another 133,300 Axis losses if they were, since Italian 10th army was totally destroyed). Allied losses in Compass were about 1,900. The listed losses are 36,441 Allied (so an additional 15,038) and 6,454 Axis (so an additional 2,663). It's as if the casualty numbers are reversed. - By the end of the first stage of the Greco-Italian war on 23 April 1941 (when Germany intervened), the Axis should have lost another 13,755 KIA, 50,874 WIA, and 3,914 missing (again ignoring POW), for an additional 68,500 Axis casualties. Allied losses were 13,325 KIA, 42,485 WIA, and 1,237 missing for a total of 57,047. - So, adding up just Compass and Greco-Italian war, and ignoring naval losses and Rommel's counterattack in Cyrenaica, on 23 April 1941 Axis losses should be a minimum of ~90,000 and Allied losses a minimum of ~59,000. Allied losses are approximately close, but Axis losses are low *by a full order of magnitude*. and again, that's before 133,000 Axis POW are accounted for. - At the start of Second El Alamein on 23 October 1942, Axis losses are listed as 33,499 with 189,072 Allied losses. On 11 November, when that battle ended, the Axis had lost somewhere between 6,800 and 24,000 men KIA/WIA, with a further 35,000-49,000 captured. Allied losses were 13,560 KIA/WIA/POW/MIA. Listed numbers on 11 November are 34,290 Axis, 193,600 Allied. So in the decisive Allied victory at El Alamein (and including numbers from Operation Torch), it appears the Axis have lost 791 men and the Allies have lost 4,528. Ignoring the upper range estimates that have Axis KIA/MIA/WIA *higher than Allied losses* during El Alamein (let alone the 40,000 POW), there is no sense at all to having the allies lose nearly 6 to 1 in their most major victory. - This is apparently some sort of alternate reality where February has 30 days.
the fact that Italy had one of the richest colonies in the whole of Africa without knowing it hurts ... fun fact: there is an italian youtuber "la biblioteca di alessandria" that have done a what if serie if italy stayed neutral in ww2, and very beautiful, above all for the fact that it shows an Italy as Mussolini wanted it, plus a nation that is the judge and balancer of Europe and without losing many territories as in our timeline Italy is richer.
What the hell are number? Did you realize casualties number are wrong? I learn number casualties? I need you see this? 🇺🇲🇿🇦🇬🇧🇦🇺🇨🇿🇬🇷🇲🇫🇵🇱 - 254,211 Allies 🇨🇵🇩🇪🇮🇹 - 577,658 Axis Only people Wikipedia.
PERKELE, WHITE'S WON THAT WAR, IF RED'S WOULD'VE WON, FINLAND WOULD BE STILL A PART OF RUSSIA. SO IM JUST SAYING... LEARN HISTORY BEFORE PUUTING THIS SHIT HERE... (Not talking to the creator, only for these little kid's who dont know anything.)
in 2 months in 1918, Mannerheim executed up to 80,000 people and set up concentration camps. This is called fascism. Karl was helped by the Swedes and the German army
So this is embarrassing. Frontlines entirely wrong; not a little wrong but completely. If it is this wrong for a war I know well, makes me wonder how (in)accurate other maps are. 🤔
Doing the research on the whole war and learning the phases of it specifically is certainly more of a challenge than learning to animate these so if if someone who has indepth knoweledge would do an accurate animation, that would probably be respected by alot of people
Italy - it will be easy Greece - well! Our spartan force ASSEMBLE! Italy - Oh! Fu*k, i am gonna lose this Germany - Italy! Are you noob Italy - wait! Hold on, i will finish them myself Germany - (i think i have to do it my self), italy, wait and don't counterattack greece, wait for it. Italy - what? After germany invade yugoslavia and then greece Germany - oh! It was easy. Italy - what? It was really hard man Germany - shut up noob, greece is bot and you lose like a megabot. Italy 💀
This is nearly entirely innaccurate. You clearly took the total casualities of the war, including the mass death of PoW camps that happened months after the battles, and divided them equally between the 4 months of fighting. The reds had not lost 10,000 men one month in. The German landing site(s) is misplaced both geographically and time-wise, and the capture of Tampere is also way too early, and none of the events on the Western coast are seen, just to name a few errors. I appreciate the effort and idea behind this video, but it just isn't historically accurate.
I had no idea that Bulgarian soldiers actually helped in the capture of greece I have aways assumed that we simply allowed Germany to use Bulgaria as a staging ground for it's invasion I really need to learn more about history
If we have any interested parties here u can find a big page of this in Wikipedia when set on English. Even more accurate frontlines of the conflict since there were some "pockets" of commies inside the white territory.
