It's all Apollo 11. Apollo 11 was the mission. The LM was called _Eagle,_ and it landed on the Moon. The module that remained in orbit was the Command Module _Columbia._

It was more than Gagarin but all the cosmonauts added fuel to the space race + 1 Russian Dog Laika up to the N-1 rocket testing. With the failure of the Russian Moon program, the US pulled back with a firm 50+ year lead.

An abort was required at any time Bingo fuel was reached as displayed in the video counter, upper right. Bingo fuel is a military aviation term that a craft must turn back as there is just enough fuel to return home safely.

Sure. Why not? They had a special ejection cockpit with a calculator watch in it that could have effected them right back up to the "command module." Why not? You can make anything up and people will believe it.

Of course there is 'lag' in communications. There is always a radio delay of 2.6 seconds both ways when the spacecraft were at the Moon. You are talking pure nonsense.

I’d LOVE to see your evidence.

@@SolarChronicle It’s called “c” the speed of light of which a radio signal is. No need for a moon flight to validate. The lag including accounting for hardware at the time was tested in Earth and can still be tested today. Please get an education. They also have an moon experiment setup by Neil and Buzz that STILL sends back signals via laser when triggered by laser from any country on Earth, not just NASA. That’s why even the Chinese and Russians don’t buy your nonsense.

@@dq1275 I think you meant to reply to the thread starter.

That data isn’t lost. Tons of information on every aspect of Apollo is available, much of it in public archives.

Agreed. Better than Buzz.

Stuhlinger was lying. We have abundant evidence that proves the Apollo landings are real.

Hört sich an wie ein vom Kreml gestreutes Gerücht, um den Erfolg der USA kleinzureden.

you might have seen this on tv, but not during the actual landing.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gzuGHzSRBzk.html

there was no live descent broadcast...only the first step and after was live...

@@apocalips8008 Yeah, I suppose I remember seeing the film of the descent later. We had the audio, though.

@@apocalips8008 There was a live broadcast, it just didn’t have any live images during the landing, just the audio.

Apollo proof: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal

Imagin thinking you're smarter than every scientist across the planet... cringe~

@@Cliffmchrist man you media narrative driven shills love throwing the word “scientist” around , tried that in 2020 and look how that worked out for you. also science didnt get humans to “the moon” it was math (if it even happened at all)

Indeed we have the great privilege of being the pioneers.

So then you weren't watching from about 13:22 on?

I only read the comments section where endless idiocy is available for all of us to see, at every click of the mouse ;) you have not failed us..

@@KPL400 Idiocy is a double edged sword. You happen to believe the hoax, I don't. And how come NONE of the astronauts would place their hands on the bible and swear they walked on the moon when asked to by Bart Sibrel?. You should let others decide who the idiots are!.

@@KPL400 You also probably believe the moon is made of cheese.

@@brianpatrick3160 Some of the astronauts did swear on the bible. They made splashdowns on return to earth because it made for a softer 'landing' than would be the case on land. What, you think they couldn't make accurate landings so they aimed for something like the pacific and hoped they'd hit the water somewhere?? Funny how there was always an aircraft carrier near to their splashdown point. And its YOU that believes in the hoax.

@@brianpatrick3160 you said _"You happen to believe the hoax, I don't"_ thank you for the Freudian slip... there is hope for your recovery.... well done...

It really isn't. :-)

You do know orbiting moon satellites have taken pictures of the Apollo landing sites right? The LROC (Lunar Reconnasissance Orbiter Camera) has taken pictures of multiple Apollo sites. So has ISRO Chandrayaan2.

@@Apollo11ApolloFlightJournal he was referring to his doctors diagnosis after his MRI brain scan...

@@captainhellhound7451 shhhh! Deniers can't handle facts.

They were paying much more for their network.

They had line-of-sight communications. You don’t.

Is the receiver on your phone the size of a house?

*_"I still don't understand"_* And therein lies the problem and at the root of all conspiracy theory belief - personal incredulity.

You're probably remembering Apollo 12. Apollo 11 happened in the middle of the Scottish summer holidays and the landing was at night. Apollo 12's landing was on Wednesday, 19 November, 1969, at 7am. I remember at primary school in Glasgow being shepherded into the school TV room to watch the Apollo 12 moonwalk which occurred around lunchtime that day. Maybe your classmates were pissed because they thought moonlandings were old hat.

Soccer nerds, eh?!

Not a movie - live. I saw it on TV 1969, as did half the planet.

@@pawthecowboycorgi No, I think Tom Hank’s was in this movie. I remember watching it as a toddler.

During one of the Mars landings, a mission director summed us up perfectly. "Not bad for a bunch of monkeys who wondered what was over the hill"

Unless he used the original film, that’s not proof. All of the photos and film has to be digitized which will leave artifacts similar to composting or editing. The digitized Apollo photo are technically fake because they don’t hold the same amount of info as the original film. It’s a scan and recreation of the film. It’s the same reason that you can take a picture with your phone, but it through an AI checker, and get told it’s an AI photo. Digitalizing anything will leave artifacts. That doesn’t even factor in if he got the picture from NASA officially or a repost on Reddit or Google. If it’s a repost and not the FIRST DIGITAL SCAN even more artifacts will get created just from being copied and pasted.

There is rover footage that's lasts several minutes and the rover is traversing miles across the lunar surface, and all objects cast one and only one shadow - meaning there is only one light source. The lighting across MILES is uniform. It is physically impossible to light a scene this vast with artificial lighting. The only light source far enough away to uniformly light VAST scenes and bright enough is the sun.

@@willoughbykrenzteinburg Yeah right and they've been back several times. In fact they've built a base on the Moon. You totally fell for the propaganda.

@@baronsilverbaron757 And that's your response? That's all you can muster. Seriously?

@@yassassin6425 Seriously.

It isn't a movement, it's nitwits from third world countries wearing sneakers that cost more than their mud hut.

Rule 35: If it exists, there are trolls about it.

A lot is 2 words.

@@dansv1You really think this correction was necessary?

@@willoughbykrenzteinburg Is it not helpful information?

Just 2 weeks ago, I found out that cannot is not a word.

@@dansv1Helpful to whom? Who doesn't understand what a person is saying when they say "alot" instead of "a lot". Who is confused? Who sees the word "alot" and has no idea what that person is saying? Where are these people?