Thank you so much for your video on NPUs! It really helped me build a basic understanding of the features, along with the pros and cons. I have a question about the Snapdragon X Elite’s NPU, which claims 45 TOPS performance. Does this level of performance surpass most competitors (excluding Apple) that competitiors struggle to catch up?
Yoo!!!! I was thinking the same way! I do see many doom and gloom about topics like this but if there's ever a case where it's integrated into infrastructure to improve those which accessibility then definitely worth it!
We're to a point of diminishing returns on silicon lithography. We're gaining density but power saving is now about management rather than the process. Process gains are minimal vs power management.
@@glenwaldrop8166 Optimized Power usage with Maximum Power, limits, Current trend is fuck power and heat, goo brrrrr with performance, Quantum computing can change the face here
Oh my, yes this is something I will be cautious of in future videos. I figured there's ways to make it less repetitive. Thanks for the feedback as I'm committed to improve.
Most of the security would be done through the computation that leverages the chip, so an NPU provides more processing power tailored toward these training models to better assist to detect threats
Soon 1000 qbits will be laughable like an old pc connected to your phone line.. Oh and apparently your channel will be huge in a year according to that guy from the future 🤓
What interests me the most is exactly on the premise that once we get that level how would the average person benefit to where they can directly? I know we are a long way from this technology being viable but the application of a quantum internet sounds intriguing
I think you should have focused on how the current experiences are solving the lowest level problems. The quantum “breakthroughs” are barely working basics of the normal parts of computers. Like this is supposed to be a wire and a transistor. Means of storing and sending information. It sounds like you’d rather use fancy words than actually explain what these things are
@@quantumfy Thanks for your input! I see what you mean, but QUE-puters is even a worse tongue twister. The word Qumputer, however, flows, when spoken. With 'calling them' I also inferred 'writing' the word Qumputer, which is new, but distinct enough from 'computer' whilst also preserving the letters 'q' and 'u' in quantum! @quantumfy
