Тёмный
Prof Melko
Prof Melko
Prof Melko
Подписаться
Chemistry lectures and "How to" videos from a university professor and Ph.D. chemist. I live stream office hours every week on Twitch where I discuss the latest news in climate change, space travel, and the intersection of science and politics. Come join the Melko Lab and learn by osmosis!
Gibbs Free Energy
22:24
Год назад
Electrolysis Made Easy
20:09
3 года назад
How to Name Chemical Compounds
22:37
3 года назад
Types of Chemical Compounds
17:41
3 года назад
How Does pH Affect Solubility?
18:41
3 года назад
Weak Base Calculations in Chemistry
28:13
3 года назад
Calculating Ka from pH for a Weak Acid
20:04
3 года назад
Комментарии
@ayabongankabane
@ayabongankabane 11 дней назад
Prof very clear explanations👏
@pereboseregodknows2018
@pereboseregodknows2018 Месяц назад
I don't really understand plotting graphs I literally suck at it Please, can anyone perhaps suggest a link to a site that handles this?
@InfoZest
@InfoZest Месяц назад
You are a gem. I have been searching this in literature for months. Thanks a lot.
@sekalongothomas
@sekalongothomas 2 месяца назад
Am glad to meet you here
@bondendaba2070
@bondendaba2070 3 месяца назад
I'm still confused by the units of k. Someone help clarify
@sadanikadayarathna4735
@sadanikadayarathna4735 3 месяца назад
What are you confused of?
@sadanikadayarathna4735
@sadanikadayarathna4735 3 месяца назад
Rate units are M/s (also can right as Ms-1) = k(rate constant which we are trying to find)and concentration M but it is M2 because we square A,so unit also get squared, so K=Ms-1/M2 therefore k=M-1s-1
@bondendaba2070
@bondendaba2070 3 месяца назад
I appreciate your help. Writing my chemistry exam in 3 days and you're making it easy for me things that have been giving me headache❤
@bondendaba2070
@bondendaba2070 3 месяца назад
Please explain your calculation @17:00. Why are you dividing by 0.01? I'm lost
@sadanikadayarathna4735
@sadanikadayarathna4735 3 месяца назад
Well what he did was he divided both sides by 0.01 which is what you get when you square 0.1,hope this helps you
@rassimsimou1594
@rassimsimou1594 4 месяца назад
Good
@user-fb6jk8ki7b
@user-fb6jk8ki7b 4 месяца назад
Why did we multiply everything by 3 to find the final answer in the last practice problem
@void439
@void439 4 месяца назад
so many lightbulb moments I've had in this one video lol
@oliviatenkala
@oliviatenkala 4 месяца назад
We can see the full screen....l didn't see the examples
@sanaznh4490
@sanaznh4490 4 месяца назад
very clear and straightforward! thank you so much
@yuhanthegreat1857
@yuhanthegreat1857 4 месяца назад
nice vid.
@_XomBae_
@_XomBae_ 6 месяцев назад
EDIT from previous comment (yt wouldnt let me) :what I meant by tons of pop-ups I meant only when you first go to the website after you start playing the movie you’re NOT gonna get tons of pop-ups interrupting the movie
@MeanMachineRex
@MeanMachineRex 6 месяцев назад
Are the bonding electrons fixed or do they play musical chair with the nonbonding ones?
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko 6 месяцев назад
Technically electrons aren't particles in a certain fixed space. They are "mostly" in one place or another, but we can't be certain and we can only speak in probabilities. Lewis dot structures are simple representations based on where the electrons are most likely to be, but they are indeed playing musical chairs at all times!
@MeanMachineRex
@MeanMachineRex 6 месяцев назад
Waiting on the Future Circular Collider to make Melkonium 😁
@MeanMachineRex
@MeanMachineRex 6 месяцев назад
Isn't annihilation the destruction of matter?
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko 6 месяцев назад
Yes I'd say that's true in some contexts. Like matter and anti-matter annihilate one another
@MeanMachineRex
@MeanMachineRex 6 месяцев назад
Can you tell which energy level the light is emitted from the atom based on the colours of the flames?
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko 6 месяцев назад
You can only tell the "difference in energies" between the levels (or sublevels more precisely). But it is often the case that it ends up in the lowest energy level, so you can sort of piece together what level it started in based on the light color and difference in energy.
@MeanMachineRex
@MeanMachineRex 6 месяцев назад
When we energize the electrons and make them jump energy level, what happens to their spin? Do they have a preferred order of suborbital to jump to? What is the higher level is full? Do they collide with the other electrons in the higher level? What happens with the electrons left behind?
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko 6 месяцев назад
They usually maintain their same spin. They also tend to change their orbital by one letter, so s to p, or p to d. But they can only go to open spots, so not if a level or sublevel is full. They don't really collide as they are not really particles, but they do interact.
@MeanMachineRex
@MeanMachineRex 6 месяцев назад
If the sublevels contradict the energy levels order then why not just reorder?
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko 6 месяцев назад
We need more complicated physics to answer this, but basically the energy levels and sublevels are allowed configurations of electrons in quantum mechanics. And the electrons themselves are these weird spread-out wave things, so not technically correct to say they are always closer or further from the nucleus. This sublevel ordering is the correct order of the "most likely" energies of the electrons at any given point.
@MeanMachineRex
@MeanMachineRex 6 месяцев назад
Why is carbon 12 chosen for atomic mass unit? I understand it has 6 protons, neutrons and electrons respectively and if we divide the mass by 6 then we will get the mass of 1 proton, neutron and electron but think if we use this unit to measure hydrogen atom it would be way off as the hydrogen atom has no neutrons.
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko 6 месяцев назад
Subatomic particles don't have perfectly whole numbers for their mass. In fact, some mass is instead energy holding the nucleus together (like E=mc^2 mass is energy!). So because an atom has a funky mass and a realllllly small number, we pick one element as a standard and round to a whole number. So since carbon is the basis of life and is common, we picked that one. So we say carbon weighs 12 atomic mass units and measure everything relative to that. Hydrogen has no neutrons, but that's really what makes it bad to base things off of, since neutrons have slightly different mass than protons.
@MeanMachineRex
@MeanMachineRex 6 месяцев назад
I recommand Uranium-235 instead of gold
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko 6 месяцев назад
Lol. Yeah gold is really dense so they chose that element.
@Chishimba_
@Chishimba_ 6 месяцев назад
I've really enjoyed your tutorials but I can't find the rest on chemical kinetics
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko 6 месяцев назад
Apologies, but I think I only have the one lecture on kinetics. Sorry about that.
@rassimsimou1594
@rassimsimou1594 6 месяцев назад
Good
@AlexDainisPhD
@AlexDainisPhD 7 месяцев назад
Thank you!! I have been struggling to understand this and had such an "ahah!" moment just three minutes in!
@childhoodobesitysnackrevie1939
@childhoodobesitysnackrevie1939 8 месяцев назад
you have a good teaching voice
@Yamen.Haidar
@Yamen.Haidar 9 месяцев назад
Could you please name the reference you rely on to include it in the article?
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko 9 месяцев назад
This is based on the third edition of "Physical Chemistry" by Engel & Reid.
@MasajjageMichael-zp6jq
@MasajjageMichael-zp6jq 9 месяцев назад
Fuckin hell😅
@alimikhenamarvellous186
@alimikhenamarvellous186 10 месяцев назад
This was helpful
@alimikhenamarvellous186
@alimikhenamarvellous186 10 месяцев назад
[A]f/[A]i = 0.5^n
@FrankUnknown
@FrankUnknown 11 месяцев назад
It still really, REALLY seems as if the overwhelming majority of people don't care about facts. People just believe whatever they want to believe, or whatever they already believe, and the facts of the matter are completely irrelevant. If they ever change their minds, they do it for their own largely BS reasons. How else to explain why SO MANY people believe ridiculous, false things? Persuasion just seems to go nowhere. I can't think of a single example of a person unironically saying "you know what, you've convinced me, I was wrong."
@user-hn9ss1pm2q
@user-hn9ss1pm2q Год назад
In a bimolecular elementary Reaction When the concentration of one of the reactants is in large excess compared to the other, the rate of the reaction becomes independent of the concentration of that reactant. Is this statement true or false,could you explain
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko Год назад
Yes this is basically true. Imagine you are making sandwiches and that you have 1,000 slices of bread spread on the counter but only 10 slices of cheese somewhere on the counter. The rate at which you can make sandwiches is really only determined by your ability to find the cheese, because there is bread readily available everywhere (it is in large excess).
@saif5428
@saif5428 Год назад
Hello ! Loved the video as a physics undergrad ! any reason to why in Modified Morse Potential, we can subtract or add De as any arbitrary constant ? from wikipedia on morse potential , I find : "Since the zero of potential energy is arbitrary, the equation for the Morse potential can be rewritten any number of ways by adding or subtracting a constant value." Then proceeded to subtract De from the main equation. I have tried reading the theory from multiple textbooks but I cannot understand why we can do this. Also isnt morse potential a true potential function but rather an approximation of taylor expansion
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko Год назад
Where you set the zero of energy does not matter. Because energy is always about relative values. For example, the energy stored in a bond is relative to the energies of the separated atoms. Adding or subtracting a constant simply moves the potential up or down on the energy scale, but does not change the relative energy values (for example the difference in energy from asymptote to the bottom of the potential), which is what's important
@surendersingal2192
@surendersingal2192 Год назад
Thank you sir for discussion on phosphine n relationship with Venus, puffin poop n bottom of oceans n mud rivers. Good day
@chestermarcol3831
@chestermarcol3831 Год назад
Yes, that demonstrates the RESULT of entanglement. And yet it offers nothing with respect to how entanglement happens. LOL
@floatinflyinandfishing
@floatinflyinandfishing Год назад
one of the biggest frustrations of my undergrad education was learning one thing one semester and being told two or three semesters later...yeah not so much, that was "hand wavy".... three reactions, redox acid base and precip
@floatinflyinandfishing
@floatinflyinandfishing Год назад
thats nitrite not nitrogen dioxide...NO2 is neutral
@aselaamaranath3812
@aselaamaranath3812 Год назад
my idea Entangle is deep logic
@nafissatoublack1234
@nafissatoublack1234 Год назад
I'm watching all your videos and where the hell have you been my entire life❤❤😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
@nafissatoublack1234
@nafissatoublack1234 Год назад
Where are the next order videos???
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko Год назад
Sorry, but I never got a chance to make those videos.
@nafissatoublack1234
@nafissatoublack1234 Год назад
@@ProfMelko 😭😭😭😭😭😭I need you😭😭😭I have an exam on Tuesday😭😭😭 i was just understanding kinetics from your videos and i was loving them😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko Год назад
​@@nafissatoublack1234 😭RIP grade....jk you got this, read the textbook and find some other similar vids 💪
@nafissatoublack1234
@nafissatoublack1234 Год назад
@@ProfMelko The lightning that will strike you is still doing push ups🤣😂 LOL...Ill read other books but seriously please make more videos, you are really gifted, you know how to teach and im watching your videos from Zimbabwe!😇
@Chishimba_
@Chishimba_ 6 месяцев назад
Truly he knows he's thing 🙌🏾🔥 Much love from 🇿🇲zambia I really enjoyed the tutorials
@faezehj9531
@faezehj9531 Год назад
It was really helpful, thank you so much.
@ernestinatakyi5150
@ernestinatakyi5150 Год назад
Thank youuuuuuu ❤. This was really helpful 🙏😊
@ernestinatakyi5150
@ernestinatakyi5150 Год назад
Thanks 👍❤️
@poptic2414
@poptic2414 Год назад
Thank you so much for this video! Really helped me for my chem classes :D
@ontariomaffsfordummies8331
@ontariomaffsfordummies8331 Год назад
Best explanation I’ve seen
@ClaraSantos-pp9ir
@ClaraSantos-pp9ir Год назад
Hi, in the last problem of the video, in the equation i might consider rate of the hydrogen, example: -d[o2]/ dt - 1/2 d[h2]/dt = 1/2 d[h2O]/dt? or not?
@ProfMelko
@ProfMelko Год назад
Yes you may write an expression in terms of H2: -1/2 d[H2]/dt = 1/2 d[H2O]/dt However, since the problem is providing you a rate for O2, it makes more sense to write the rate expression in terms of O2 and go from there.
@mulungushiuniversity8603
@mulungushiuniversity8603 Год назад
Thanks
@willykipla7
@willykipla7 Год назад
Thanks alot professor 🤗
@rigwellamankwah
@rigwellamankwah Год назад
Amongst all the RU-vidr i know, you are the one who made me understand this very well...thanks bro!
@CREATIVEPRINCESSUwU_1605
@CREATIVEPRINCESSUwU_1605 Год назад
i love it thanks so much !