Queensland Law Society advocates for good law and good lawyers in Queensland. We provide leadership and support for our members and the community. This includes offering resources and a collaborative social environment via our RU-vid channel.
They have it instilled into them to have a fear and hatred to outsiders. Teachers used to have to be on guard at the high school because the boy would just get the...erge...and try and take his sister on the field. Can do it any time out of school....and with the detriment to their IQ's etc...they just don't understand why it is inappropriate. Nearly EVERY family in existence has a 'Uncle Joe' who they permit to continue his atrocities because of the shame it would bring on the family.
Police and private prison system are too corrupt to function properly. Complete reform is immediately required to stop all the blatant corruption and especially the kidnapping and incarceration of innocent Australians. These kidnap victims dont get any access to make contact with a family member or their lawyer. Its a police and prison system crime and its very common nowadays. Perhaps you couls start right here and fix the core base problem with Australias judicial system. Since when have "zoom" courts been the norm in Australia? Crikey.
Today I go to court to face bs that is about to cost me my life. I've been destroyed by junkie criminal's backed by police and left feeling completely worthless. I was a business owner and employer now homeless
Hi, If Clancy Fox sent two witnesses (Snr Const David Harrison and One Nation Candidate Wade Rothery) to a small room together just before they were due to give evidence in a crimminal trial and I recorded them and then Const Harrison charged me by mail with two counts of contempt of court for disobeying justice Mark Morrow's directions but then Mr Morrow refused to give evidence and my trial date simply vanished when Mr Morrow decided to retire and leave town, what should I do?. Last time I attended the Rockhampton Registrar's office I asked a visiting police officer to come with me which she was happy to do because she thought it was a simple clerical error but then minutes later had to negotiate me "Getting out of there in one piece" past the 7 police officers blocking our exit. Do I just send all the documents and recordings to channel 9 or what? Am I just on bail for contempt of court forever now or what? The CCC has stated that the 70 pages of evidence I've provided were misplaced due to a clerical error, they've addmitted fault, appologised but unfortunately they still don't seem to have a budget available for this kind of thing. The last 18 charges brought against me have born no fruit and sending the Police Commissioner's Barrister to take on me (a landscaper) shows how desperate and hopeless you all really are, all I can say is that after the way the Qld Govt. has conducted itself in these matters, I will ask no further qurter from any of you and in turn you should also expect none from me.
I lost a lot of respect for McMurdo after she recommended to the Qld government that people charged with serious offenders should be able to be named in the media even BEFORE they are committed to trial. This will lead to trial by media as in the Pell case and Lindy Chamberlain case and many others!
12:31 min ... ....... "duty not to mislead the court applies to both the law and facts related to any matter before the court" ... "requirement not to misrepresent the law ... requirement to draw the court's attention to authorities that both support and go against the client's case." ... "duty not to mislead the courts extends beyond oral evidence or submissions made on behalf of the client. The duty also extends to documentation filed in court on behalf of the client, including pleadings and affidavits." Uniform Conduct rules (Solicitors) ... "it has long been recognised that lawyers employed by the state as prosecutors are 'to regard themselves as ministers of justice, and not to struggle for a conviction'. As 'ministers of justice', prosecutors have a wider duty of fairness than that applied to other lawyers in the adversarial process, and a duty to act impartially." Lawyers in Australia, third edition 2015. Scalia Lecture I Justice Stephen G. Breyer 'The Authority of the Court and the Peril of Politics', Published April 8, 2021 41:58 min ... Justice Stephen Breyer said, "try to put it in it's better light, not it's worst light, never interpret a statute, not that I can think of, I hate to say never, because there are always exceptions, but don't interpret a statute to do something ridiculous and then say it's unconstitutional, interpret it so that it will be constitutional, and the other thing ... listen to what ... people say and maybe even repeat it back ... put succinctly ... ". It seems like a good parenting philosophy too, and a good life philosophy, to stay calm and prevent, 'woe is me' scenarios, for the most part (it seems like it is in part about having that mix, balance and check, between not having an autonomous centralised power yet also not having a localised autonomous centralised power that is compartmentalised.).
I can not instruct or consent to a situation where childrens' matters are conditional on financial matters, or, financial matters conditional on childrens' matters.
Here is a sort of argument .... In this day and age, how is it ok for there to be a Womens Legal Service ..., or, there be a Womens Legal Service ... and it be sponsored: by private law firms or otherwise? Isn't that a bit like having an x-husband providing spousal maintenance? Or, like being supported by a spouse? They wouldn't be successful otherwise, or not survive in the profession? They can't stand on their own two feet? They aren't independent, self-sufficient women? Where do finances come from? Women, or women and men, or legal entities? Is that misrepresentation, in branding or marketing: women legal service? Is that misleading and deceptive conduct? You know, it seems like there is a push for 50:50 equality in the workplace, females and males. Otherwise, it would be discriminatory, no? or, hypocritical? The legal field, statistically has more females. It seems like the legal field needs more men. ... discuss, or, don't discuss ... it's up to you.
Strikes? ... if a surname of a senior associate is the same, as a surname of the spouse of an extended family like member employed by a business of a family and whose career is also involved in their spouse's industry, and, with the same surname of a high ranking police officer who is the father of the spouse - that might not seem like a situation to make sure there is no conflict of interest? ... especially when it looks like a senior associate replies to correspondence of another solicitor - sign, authentication, verification of identity, signature of who? and that might not seem like ethical infrastructures not necessarily in place, like Chinese walls? ... and, when communication screened by a personal assistant and a solicitor in another department involved - that might not seem like an ... employer locking out an employee, primary and or secondary boycott, third party target? ... what do I know though ... it might not be correct. Procedure? ... that's a different story, and while not substantive and law does not concern itself with trifles, if as if like the sum of micro-aggressions, procedural fairness/due process, perverting the course of justice/the administration of the law/denial of natural justice ... obstruction ... then, it could be quite serious ... judicial review ... ... misconstrued? Perhaps, if the construct in form, is not contiguous or literal and the context not littoral, it could still be said adjacent, and in priniciple, adjective? ... partnership law ... legal firms ... have maintained access to courts of equity ... ... so ... in family law ... ? What about in accounting, goodwill? ... branding value? ... a car's a car ... right?
"The Believing Brain: Evolution, Neuroscience, and the Spiritual Instinct" World Science Festival Premiered Jun 1, 2019 49:54 min ... "uncertainty is tremendously stressful for a human nervous system ... it adds a metabolic burden ... if it persists can actually make someone sick ..." 50:45 min ... "allostatic burden" 51:25 min ... "your brain is constantly running a budget for the resources in your body ... glucose and salt and so on and so forth ... uncertainty just drains that budget much faster and makes it really harder for people ..." 51:49 min ... "there is also ... a social aspect ... what that means is that we regulate each others nervous systems, we don't bear that body budget on our own ..." 52:27 min ... "we, as primates, have all of those ways to regulate each other, ..." What is enough nutrients (no euphemism) for one person is going to be different for someone else. What is enough nutrients for one person at one stage or point in life is going to be different at another stage or point in that same life. For example, when pregnant and not feeling ill, nutritional needs for that person would be different to when they are pregnant and feeling ill, or when they are not pregnant and are not feeling ill, or when they are not pregnant and are feeling ill. Hitch ... ? What is that? People still 'hitch' ... ? There are health charts, outlining suggested average repeat ranges for a 'hitch' per week, with variations for age. If you think about it from that perspective, it is, for everybody, a health or medical need, for wellness, mental wellbeing, like getting enough nutrients, intellectual stimulation, social interaction, exercise, e.t.c. Apparently, there are increased rates of certain types of cancers in populations who indefinitely don't 'hitch', or go for extended or prolonged periods of time without getting a 'hitch'? Taking out the 'non-platonic' aspect of 'hitch', to make it neutral ... Are the results from decades ago psychological or social studies of orphans in Ukraine, looked after but without human touch, not common knowledge? It is not dissimilar to the idea that touch from a significant other can lower a woman's blood pressure at least as well as medication, if not faster? Ethology? In some cultures, platonic touch, bodywork, massage, for health, well being, mental, emotional, physical, spiritual, medical e.t.c., is undertaken (sort of as if like a public health mandate, but not), out in the open, a communal exercise, involving extended family, friends, health practitioners, appointed religous leaders, e.t.c., at home, in gardens, in health centres, at sacred religious spaces, within medical systems, e.t.c. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy visits HLS Published on October 27, 2015 23: 40 min ... "and we don't pay any attention to it. Everybody thinks, well, we can leave it to the lawyers or the people in sociology or, but a), as you indicated, I think rightly, Dean, the thing is, I think it's everyones job, particularly, I think we have to step up ... and solitary confinement, is, people are in there for years. When I was in the Army, they gave us training, because I was in a unit that had combat ... training for it, and so they locked us up in a cell and some of us were tortured just very slightly, and after four hours in the cell I was going mad. These people have been, 40 days, 40 months, 20 years, in solitary confinement, it drives men mad, and we don't even think about it." The Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy Didn't the Uk Supreme court decide that 19 days, detention, even home detention or isolation was too long? Actually, it might have been 18 hours? "Justice Ginsburg and Baroness Hale: The British and United S" Published on May 28, 2008 45:36 min ... 46:18 min ... 47:27 min ... "Belmarsh decision" 48:30 min ... "Severity of the house arrest ... most severe order the government had made was 18 hours inside your house ..." 50:19 min ... "by a majority of three to two, we say 18 hours is too much."
... 23 replies. 24 comments in total including this comment. Showing as 19 replies and 19 or 22. A reply disappearing. Is this Australia? Is Queensland Law society deleting comments? Trustworthiness of Queensland Law society? Comments not staying ... seems un-Australian ... Is this Australia? Doesn't seem cool. How can there be trust? Comments not staying ... seems un-Australian ... How can confidence in the court be maintained if unable to communicate with those who advocate? Comments not staying ... seems un-Australian ...
If Australia fails, if democracy in Australia fails, if the protection of human rights in Australia fail, where to? Freedom from arbitrary detention is different to freedom of movement, however, freedom from arbitrary detention by the state, unless according to law, is guaranteed by ICCPR Art 9, and is "applicable to all deprivation of liberty", with possible compensation for unlawful arrest or detention. When it comes to mandates for rat test(s), or social distancing, how are competing medico-legal issues, like medical trespass and consent, resolved - have adults had the ability to decide for themselves, as any adult over 18 might, and or, has that been taken away: in general, in health/medical, and or, in government? It sounds like so far, people have been advised of expectations, needs, requirements, but, are those opinions on rules according to laws, and if they are, where can the legislation for those rules be found; and, Can it be said that those rules are not inconsistent with established prevailing laws, (such as Freedom from arbitrary arest, informed consent, entitlement to refuse treatment, freedom of movement between states provided by the Australian Constitution, etc.); and, If Australia fails, if democracy in Australia fails, if the protection of human rights in Australia fail, where to? When it comes to Health Law, affecting health service practice, informed consent is needed, otherwise, it could be considered assault; and, This is part of the Australian Constitution .... Chapter 1: The Parliament: Part V: Powers of the Parliament. Section 51 "... subject to this Constitution, ... to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth ... "; and, (xxiiiA) "... medical ... (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription)"; and, Chapter V: The States Section 116 ("Commonwealth not to legislate in respect of religion") "The Commonwealth shall not make any law for establishing any religion, or for imposing any religious observance, or for prohibiting the free exercise of any religion, and no religious test shall be required as a qualification for any office or public trust under the Commonwealth."; and, There is an entitlement to refuse treatment at common law - for example, medical consent, Medical Treatment Act 1988(Vic); and, This is part of the Australian Constitution .... Section 109: When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid. www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Constitution/chapter5 If Australia fails, if democracy in Australia fails, if the protection of human rights in Australia fail, where to? "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) - OHCHR (The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Right)" ... ? Common Siracusa Principles - "restrictions on human rights under the ICCPR must meet standards of legality, evidence-based necessity, proportionality, and gradualism."(.gov articles); and, While, "In time of public emergency which threatens the life of the nation and the existence of which is officially proclaimed, State Parties to the present Covenant may take measures derogating from their obligations under the present Covenant to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, provided that such measures are not inconsistent with their other obligations under international law and do not involve ... " Part II, Article 4, paragraph 1; and, "4. Anyone who is deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedings before a court, in order that that court may decide without delay on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if the detention is not lawful." Part III, Article 9, paragraph 4. www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights If Australia fails, if democracy in Australia fails, if the protection of human rights in Australia fail, where to? Given the health/medical advice, how can the legislation be obtained for clarification of the law? Democracy without courts or access to courts and representation, is not a democracy. Courts are part of democracy. Even if, as a stand alone system or branch within democracy, some are not perceived to be democratic in process, if courts or access to courts and representation, disappeared, then, there would no longer be three branches of government nor a functioning democracy. Democracy without courts or access to courts and representation, is not a democracy. Courts are part of democracy. Which branches write the laws that the court's follow and for access to courts and representation? Democracy without courts or access to courts and representation, is not a democracy. Courts are part of democracy. It looks like interference of court processes from other countries, states, external, in a functioning democracy would be interference in government; and, With those involved in inteference, possibly seen as partaking in a category distinct and separate to things like, procedural fairness/due process, perverting the course of justice/the administration of the law/denial of natural justice ... obstruction); and, With those involved in inteference, possibly seen as partaking in terrorism: and, As individuals; Individual criminals; Not as a state; and With no immunity; even if, - sponsored by a state and working officially, - employed by a state, and or, - as a team. Otherwise: If courts or access to courts and representation, disappeared, then, there would no longer be three branches of government nor a functioning democracy; and, A sort of state where it seems, the situation and circumstances would make it possible, for: Another country to take over; and or, Other countries, states, external, to intervene. Democracy without courts or access to courts and representation, is not a democracy. Courts are part of democracy. If Australia fails, if democracy in Australia fails, if the protection of human rights in Australia fail, where to? Stay well. Peace. Eleonora Formato née Szczepanowski South Australia
... vi et armis ... Today, in this modern era, it would seem to be about keeping covid, a virus, a foreign entity, out of the body, yet, there are those injected with a foreign entity; those who are infected by a foreign entity; those who naturally were infected with a foreign entity; and those who are not infected. It seems, that as long as some insist all must be injected to be vaccinated, and with ongoing regular booster shots (or else!), that there are again, two classes of citizens: citizens paying to be infected with an injection, to be given a first-class status, with all the rest, citizens infected and not infected, being given a second-class status. Part V: Powers of the Parliament. Section 51 "... subject to this Constitution, ... to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth ... "; and, (xxiiiA) "... medical ... (but not so as to authorize any form of civil conscription)" (From, Australian Parliament House, website) Common Siracusa Principles - 'restrictions on human rights under the ICCPR must meet standards of legality, evidence-based necessity, proportionality, and gradualism.'.gov articles ? (It sounds like the present situation, not unlike a monopoly or cartel: if covid treatment and testing is, as if a given, as if taken for granted, a guaranteed income for a specific treatment, does it really seem like the type of competitive environment open to the possibility for risk, a type of risk necessary for further scientific research and development, when that is costly and risky?) It may sound like, when it comes to COVID the issue is a question of vaccination, one of education, in science, statistics and seriousness of outcome, or convictions, however, it seems like the issue is confusion around duty of care and causation. It looks like the consensus is, that the extent to which being vaccinated eliminates transmission, is uncertain, therefore, a civic duty argument for being vaccinated to minimise transmission, to eliminate causation as a factor with certainty, seems moot, and as a precautionary burden, not the most pragmatic. If on the other hand, the idea of vaccination is to provide, at a lower intensity, an immune response to give a memory for the body on how to deal with a virus if it should encounter it again, then, perhaps, it is that the government ought to have a duty of care to make vaccinations available and accessible, with and through educational information, however, it sounds like it is as if the body has no memory if there is a variation of the virus, and, there are new variations of the virus each season, then, on balancing competing beneficial outcomes, it may not be of social utility to expect that COVID vaccinations ought to be available, taken or made to be taken, by all? It sounds like by injecting the vaccination, the natural barriers or defences being bypassed, like the skin barrier being broken to get a pathogen past it and also not including otolaryngology. It does not sound inclusive. I still like my (it's not the worst batna) alternative 'v' argument, for the majority, although, as a legitimate argument for a majority or minority, I don't actually like it .... If the argument, it is compulsory to have a vaccination or say, wear a helmet for protection, then how about other forms of protection? How about instead of 'V' for vaccination, it is 'V' for 'vasectomy'? If the argument is that getting a vaccination is about reassurance, education and understanding, and not bullying, then, it could be said a vasectomy is fair because not all people can have children, women can't get men pregnant, it would protect children from covid, it would show that people cared about other people, there would be no need to question a persons gender or sexuality, and, apparently, a vasectomy takes a few moments, isn't painful, and might feel like a little pinch, and therefore, it does not seem like it would be too dissimilar to the process of getting a vaccine, in that, it would take a few moments, wouldn't be painful, and might feel like a little pinch? If, it became mandatory to have a medical passport with record of a vasectomy and of the status kept uptodate regularly, seasonally, each year, as it can be reversed, of tests taken to verify the vasectomy is still working, to be able to have a job, career, travel, leave the house, it would still then be their choice, whether to get a vasectomy or not, correct? For those who choose not to get a vasectomy, would it still be seen as their free choice? It seems like: All are as if in a 'preventative detention' not for punshmiment, but for fear of being humans with immune systems vulnerable to re-offending indefinitely with infections and transmission of COVID, under a control order necessitating getting a 'jab' in the arm, vaccinated, prohibiting associations, visiting certain places, activities, ownerships, etc; or, All are as if slaves awaiting to receive a vaccine ticket ' jab', in the arm, to be contractually bound by terms and conditions on accepting that vaccine ticket to freedom, but not indefinitely, and not unlike personal'property on a lease that cannot be held indefinitely, needing to renew regularly; and, It does not seem unreasonable under those circumstances to foresee potential doors opening for opportunities of ease for coercion, undue influence, exploitation, blackmail, harassment in supply of consumer goods and services, sale of a vaccine as if a body part by a destitute person, etc.? If it is valid, as it seems it is suggested, that just about everyone needs to be vaccinated, for the good of others, or, it is not unacceptable to use as a singular criteria, of some sort of success to do with covid, in insisting most if not all be vaccinated? How is it then not valid to have a lockdown of just about everyone, for the good of others, or, it not unacceptable to use that same singular criteria for lockdowns?
"33:23 min ... I would just ask Judges to remember that they're the guardians of freedom, and lawyers to remember that they're the counsellors and the critics and the conscious of the guardians. - The Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy" "Conversation with The Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy Aug 28, 2010 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Conversation with The Honorable Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States."
Revisiting the definition of ... 'allegedly' ... might be in order, as a good standing, in general, and a sort of rule of thumb of fact checking, if not prone to, to alleviate being supine, or a refrain, from a standing start during sitting, so as not to be lying down on the job, and it could be done standing, sitting, or supine, perhaps even prone? Seems like common sense?
... can I sue fb from blocking communication and getting assistance? ... procurement of an outcome? ... how about linkedin? How about ... e.t.c.? My comments on yt (at various times, over at least a year or two) are not staying anywhere on yt ... they disappear within about 17 to 30 seconds or straight away, on first refresh or while editing and are then unavailable to post, or ... problem with server [404] ... and, fb has been blanket disabling comment functions on fb at times ... with failed to post and '!' symbol ... also, not sure what has happened to my linkedin account ..."Sorry, we couldn’t find that post. Let’s try again… Retry" ... "Something went wrong. We're having issues loading the page. Go to your feed" ... "This profile is not available. Retry" ... ... and, ... not sure what is happening with emails I send ... sometimes, no reply ... othertimes, a reply doesn't sound as if written coming from who it looks like it is being sent from ... or, email automated reply (which is not necessarily a bad thing - it is confirmation of some sort at least) and then no automated reply and no reply ... or, message blocked (550 Administrative prohibition - envelope blocked) ... or, email account is too full or no longer exists (even though showing as current, on current at the time yt live streams, for example) ... and, the last time I tried to use registered post, to confirm communication was getting through to a particular person, it wasn't signed by them and a reply came from a completely different department?
A question from a person in the audience: "49:55 min ... "I just wanted to ask, there's been a growing trend for a variety of reasons for advocates to obtain medical reports, particularly in relation to mental health issues not neccessarily very severe ones, where in the past you wouldn't. Does it really make a difference to the courts in your experience?" A reply from Former District Court Judge John Robertson: "50:36 min ... "interest ... in psychiatry and psychology, because I've been in the profession for so long, I've seen how DSM, DSM II when I first started, now it's DSMVI I think, and how they categorise something as a mental illness in one manual and by the next manual it's not, and really a it's got to almost a non sensical stage ... 52:51 min ... inherent I think in your question is, you probably think it is overdone, and I agree, and I think unless there is clear evidence, that is evidence of pre-existing mental condition such as major depression ... then getting a psychologist to sort of write a long report talking about all these tests that have been done, psychometric tests that have been done, which really produce a result saying this person's an alcholic? drug dependant? when that's obvious, is not helpful and can be counterproductive." A reply from the person in the audience: "57:33 min ..."I think probably the reason I did raise that question is that it seems, I get the impression that very often advocates these days are almost afraid to put things forward without having the backup of a medical report, even if it's just about anxiety, depression, alcohol or drugs and therefore we're in a cycle of getting expensive reports, it almost allowing the medicos to do the submission rather than what used to be the advocates role." A further reply from Former District Court Judge John Robertson: "54:15 min ... " it's problematical ... I always found a short, succinct report from the general practitioner who knew the person and treated them for a lengthy period of time, a lot more effective ... " "Modern Advocate Lecture Series 2018| Former District Court Judge John Robertson." 25 October 2018. Is this Australia? Is Queensland Law society deleting comments? Trustworthiness of Queensland Law society? Comments not staying ... seems un-Australian ... Is this Australia? Doesn't seem cool. How can there be trust? Comments not staying ... seems un-Australian ... How can confidence in the court be maintained if unable to communicate with those who advocate? Comments not staying ... seems un-Australian ... It would seem to me that it could be good if there were at least a person in a position of mentorship I could talk to or correspond, even more so that it be a person with whom the court had confidence and so could I. In a short presentation available by LexisNexis Australia on Courtroom Etiquette, Barrister Richard Burbidge QC suggests finding someone for guidance and that if the right person is asked, they will be happy to do so. I have found this generally to be true, previously, in other areas. As an example, my music teacher during my teenage years, Mrs ....., otherwise known as .... ...... OBE, in theory at the time could have already retired, and for arguments sake, if she had been part of the Judiciary would have been in her life around that point in time it mandatory to retire, yet showed no signs of slowing in her field. I was fortunate to receive scholarships to study with her over multiple years, still appreciate the mentorship given by her to me and remember that mentorship with fondness and sense of professional friendship. I am missing this in my life and would like to find, to follow a similar line of thought to QC Burbidge, the right person to ask(I realise that this is not one directional, that also, I need to be the right person to be accepted.). While I realise that I am not a new member of the profession, let alone a member, I do have confidence in the court and wonder, with consent, if there might be a member who is retired or semi-retired, for whom being a mentor would not be an imposition, perhaps would not mind being a mentor and either I could be put in contact with or this message with my contact details passed along to them so that they can contact me? Kind regards, Eleonora Formato, née Szczepanowski (Elenia is a diminutive of Eleonora, previously however was sometimes used, for example, on stage.) 0417 579 364 ('Charlotte' in my email address is my daughter's name) eleonorawithcharlotte gmail com
It sounds like the process of the type of writing discussed feels like a process not dissimilar to revictimisation? (... a memoir - not dissimilar to an Affidavit?) Bryan A. Garner, 0:02 min... "what's it been like working on your memoirs?" Hon. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, 0:06 min ..." it's like a death wish, it's a (pain), it's a different kind of writing, and it's really hard, and it's dealing with things that you've, that are long forgotten and rightfully so there's a reason why we forget things, and to have to relive them is not all that easy, and then write about it and then edit it..." 1:00 min... "it's like I've said, I'm not saying anything about editing briefs that I don't practice myself, so just editing, and it's a lot of work." Bryan A. Garner, 1:21 min ..." You say never again on these memoirs, on the other hand, you've got thirty forty great years ahead of you?" Hon. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, 1:28 min..." Yeah, but I'm not writing about it. I don't care what any body says ... I don't want to write about me anymore, I don't want to talk about me anymore. " Bryan A. Garner, 1:46 min ... "One last question about that, what is the great challenge of ... " Hon. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, 1:57 min to 2:35 min. Hon. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, Part 3
I don't feel good ... they made me take some medication and are ignoring my specialists treatment ... 7:01pm ... Sat, 18/6 ... video looks blurry ... the same video which looked clear all day ... near Woodville but for some reason Brooklyn Park is showing for google location ... in South Australia near the centre of Adelaide from either suburb. Stay well. Peace. Eleonora Formato née Szczepanowski South Australia
Would it be impossible for Former District Judge John Robertson to be my lawyer? ... please. Thank you. Stay well. Peace. Eleonora Formato née Szczepanowski South Australia
I can not instruct or consent to a situation where childrens' matters are conditional on financial matters, or, financial matters conditional on childrens' matters. Time, takes a toll on a person's body, an assault on the senses ... vi et armis. Time, it can't be retrieved ... Lyrics ... "you can't trace time ... ", song "Changes" by David Bowie. It's not about listening, to understand ... for understanding? It's not about judicial deliberation? It's not about respectful curiosity? It's not about people? It's not about dignity, within and of all people, to be listened to? It's not about striving for excellence, for ... "We the people" ... ? 'Silence' and 'free speech', it would seem they could be two sides of the same coin. It would seem that 'silence' could share the same space as 'free speech'. It seems like, a pressure proof test: the content highly flammable. It sounds like, even an opinion that is not final, is liable to cause pressure. It feels like an opinion is being put to the test. It looks like proof, that words matter as does saying nothing, at all. More than words.
I wonder if Felicity ever thinks about woman dying in garbage chutes....?? Disgraceful to think we have to respect a person such as herself. She needs to be discredited along with her husband and son-in-law should be in jail.
A question from a person in the audience: "49:55 min ... "I just wanted to ask, there's been a growing trend for a variety of reasons for advocates to obtain medical reports, particularly in relation to mental health issues not neccessarily very severe ones, where in the past you wouldn't. Does it really make a difference to the courts in your experience?" A reply from Former District Court Judge John Robertson: "50:36 min ... "interest ... in psychiatry and psychology, because I've been in the profession for so long, I've seen how DSM, DSM II when I first started, now it's DSMVI I think, and how they categorise something as a mental illness in one manual and by the next manual it's not, and really a it's got to almost a non sensical stage ... 52:51 min ... inherent I think in your question is, you probably think it is overdone, and I agree, and I think unless there is clear evidence, that is evidence of pre-existing mental condition such as major depression ... then getting a psychologist to sort of write a long report talking about all these tests that have been done, psychometric tests that have been done, which really produce a result saying this person's an alcholic? drug dependant? when that's obvious, is not helpful and can be counterproductive." A reply from the person in the audience: "57:33 min ..."I think probably the reason I did raise that question is that it seems, I get the impression that very often advocates these days are almost afraid to put things forward without having the backup of a medical report, even if it's just about anxiety, depression, alcohol or drugs and therefore we're in a cycle of getting expensive reports, it almost allowing the medicos to do the submission rather than what used to be the advocates role." A further reply from Former District Court Judge John Robertson: "54:15 min ... " it's problematical ... I always found a short, succinct report from the general practitioner who knew the person and treated them for a lengthy period of time, a lot more effective ... " "Modern Advocate Lecture Series 2018| Former District Court Judge John Robertson." 25 October 2018.
Would it be impossible for Former District Judge John Robertson to be my lawyer? Thank you. Stay well. Peace. Eleonora Formato née Szczepanowski South Australia
Actually, make that, a couple of comments, and now a few, or, multiple comments, disappeared ... making comments, writing, disappear, seems like a very un-Aussie thing to do ...