I discuss modern warships, naval aviation, and related topics, with a focus on China and sometimes other nations. Excuse my strange accent. I am originally from Taiwan. Please consider donating to my channel on Patreon, Buy Me A Coffee, or Paypal (see links at bottom of the page).
those models are civilian with guns strapped on, imagine what a military model can do, or even worst put in a electric motor or some kind of hybrid motor and you have a silent death machine from above, also there is a way to make them do a hop takeoff and landing with some adjustments to the rotor blades, and there are 4 seat models out there.
China is ahead of US in space proving Technology isn't war, what is sad about humanity is we think need 1000 nukes and 17,000 stealth jets to be strong, when Russia detonated Tsar bomb the world was shocked but the scientists were oh my god electricity for 1 million homes for 5yrs.
There was news about a Chinese nuclear submarine sinking in the Yangtze River by western media, then Indonesian RU-vid reported it too, really embarrassing news for Indonesian IQ, I'm Indonesian too. but I don't believe the news, only western propaganda,
Why never show full video of J35 take off and landing on Fujian carrier ??? Just show still photo and some video playback of plane ! Dun even know what plane izit 😂😂😂
Well, turns out the plane is designed to fly from all three carriers. This shouldn't be a surprise. The plane has the same thrust-to-weight ratio as and larger wing area than the F/A-18E. It's able to take off from the long take-off position of the Liaoning and Shandong, just like how the Super Hornets can take off from the Vikramaditya and Vikrant (they were offered for the Indian naval fighter tender but lost to Rafale-M).
I think the best decision is to not make a STOVL version for amphibious assault ships. A naval and airforce version have far easier time for commonality manufacturing since their requirements are quite similar, than to have to accomodate an STOVL version like the F-35.
The PLA Navy Marine Corps does not have its own fixed wing aircraft and relies entirely on the PLAN to provide fixed wing aircraft support. It would make no sense to build a STOVL version of J-35. By contrast, the US Marine Corps has very different operational requirements and bought over 350 F-35B alone, making the USMC the third largest user of F-35 in the world. It would make sense to build a STOVL version of the F-35.
@@gelinrefira Besides operating from amphibious assault carriers, the USMC requires fixed wing aircrafts operating from quickly prepared forward land bases with very short runways without tying down any of the Navy's big fleet carriers. This mode of operations makes STOVL aircrafts like the AV-8B Harrier II and the F-35B indispensable. The PLAN Marine Corps perhaps doesn't operate that way at all.
@@tvgerbil1984 Well, given that China is not an imperialist country that has no desire to set up bases in places where good runways or forward bases for invasions of other countries rampantly, the PLA Marine corps don't have to operate like invaders.
Well done on a fairly balanced report. Yes, it will be years before we know how good the J-31/J-35 is, but it is impressive to see how quickly the Chinese have developed the carrier version.
Chinese military equipment has underperformed everytime it’s been put to the test in both exsercis and real world use. I wouldn’t compare this plane to the f35
Any examples? China hasn't been at war in ages. If you're judging based on how export equipment has performed, the same could be said about US equipment in Ukraine. I dont think weapons shipped abroad are a good measure of the overall quality of a country's military equipment
Everybody now knows that F35 and F16 sold to other countries and allies have hidden detonators in them like the pagers and walkie-talkies in Lebanon. The US can trigger them anytime.
It's an assumption by outsider With cranes, only "possible" submarine there Also the water are shallow its internal river, in middle of China Submarine is very hard to "drown" in shallow inland river If that is truely a submarine because the photo is sketchy, plus just like Fujian deck crack highly possible another sensation If it is a submarine, basically just take it back up
The US senate approved USD1.6 billion for anti-China propaganda - this reported by many US main stream media. And you still fall for this SSN sunk nonsense? C'mon.
How big is a nuclear submarine? If you compare the size of the submarine in the picture with the size of the nuclear submarine, you will know which one is fake news. This is the launching test of China’s new unmanned small submarine
Thank you man ! On question of comparison with LIGHTNING II. The mere fact alone that J-35 is twin engined aircraft with lesser combined thrust than Lightning make things interesting. (I had an impression that it’s other way around.)
What do the Chinese think of the HiMARS? Well the Chinese are planning to fly to Mars and bring a soil sample from Mars back to Earth for humankind, whereas the HiMARS is a killing device like a cigarette on wheels. Pfft! 😅
Can you verify (do some fact-finding) on U.S. military officials saying a brand-new Chinese nuclear submarine sank at the shipyard. I don't believe it in a second from the U.S. and the western media. It is another propaganda to smear China. Of course, many western media picked up on that story and ran with it.
This is a normal military development for a big country, a superpower that right now, is more powerful economically, than the other superpower, the USA... Washington shouldn´t be panicking... This is normal... But, the U.S.A. is scared because its bad conscience...
Lotsa big talk for something constructed with soft steel and questionable copied tech. Let’s not even get into “in actual combat conditions.” Just zip there.😊
A gun on an aitcraif these days is rediculus ... unless you need one and you don't have one ^^ We learned that shooting an aircraft gun at a cruise missile is a mighty dumb idea, so they are pretty muchlimited to intimidate groundforces while strafing them.
am trying collect some indicator why an aircraft being named 5th generation 1. closed weapon bay 2. supercruise 3. stealth body with stealth coating 4. sensor fusion so how many indicator from those does J35 have
@@tigersilberhannes9153 by that criteria, that and the J-20A, as well as the F-22 post the big upgrade package they have planned for it. To be fair I think it’s not a great criteria, I think at least having most of those boxes ticked, while definitely having stealth, is enough to meet the 5th gen classification.
I wonder how rapidly the PLA Navy can build up numbers of this aircraft? China has a significant aircraft construction capability, and it would be reasonable to expect a significant number of airframes constructed annually. Mind you the J-15 is not an inferior aircraft, and is a very reliable (and probably cheaper) aircraft to build.
5 per month is a good number to start with.... maybe ramp to a 10 a month plus the J31 version as well.... maybe then they'll reduce the J11 production
@@shenzhong2942that’s not how the Chinese do things. They build slow when it comes to prototypes, but when they are happy with the design they go into sausage mode and just print the fuckers.
@@shenzhong2942eh. China doesn’t suffer from the same geopolitical and economic restrictions Russia has that’s slowing production. I mean they did pump out a hell of a lot of j-20’s.
The aircraft carriers of mainland China are named after coastal provinces. There are 14 provincial-level administrative regions along China's coast, and currently, China has 3 aircraft carriers (Liaoning, Shandong, Fujian) and 2 amphibious assault ships (Hainan, Guangxi), meaning China is still lacking 9 vessels of aircraft carrier level. The people of various provinces are competing for priority naming rights. There's no need for anyone to be anxious; China is simply returning to its long-held historical status. The United States and its allies also need not be anxious, as worrying will not help.😂😂😂
With All due respect and love for China. We first need to have HK and Macao back !!! I always thought one nation two system means HK has own governance, but reality is somewhat perplexing to me who is Hard Core Admirer of Han Civilization. Or Mainland. This Olympic was a sobering event. We don’t even have One FLAG. One CURRENCY. One Border. One Custom. Lol!!! It’s none of my business but quite perplexing when we ask and demand respect of Sovereignty. I mean China and HK trade like two Sovereign Independent Nations. 😂😂😂 What kind of joke, irony, or dichotomy is that. They Even have their own MONETARY AGENCY aka INDEPENDENT CENTRAL BANK. Shocking Revelation. Also, on the contrary, what else HK need ! 😂😂😂 Such ungrateful spoiled brats they are. There is nothing, not a single element, that doesn’t make them a separate nation. They Even Have their OWN HK PASSPORT. Lol!!!! 😂😂😂
