Тёмный
Law School Lumberjack
Law School Lumberjack
Law School Lumberjack
Подписаться
Property Law 101: Gifts
8:24
3 года назад
The Doctrine of Waste:  Life Tenancies
5:31
3 года назад
Stuartburn v. Kiansky Case Brief
3:29
3 года назад
Contract Law 101: Misrepresentation
9:56
4 года назад
Комментарии
@Nima.Mahmoud
@Nima.Mahmoud 12 дней назад
very helpful
@dreonthetube
@dreonthetube 2 месяца назад
This is happening in my family right now. My greedy uncle emptied my grandmas bank account behind everyones backs while she was still alive. He thought that since it was a joint bank account he could get away scotch free. Thank goodness for pecore v pecore because we can actually have some recourse. The money belongs to the estate, and he has no proof it was a gift 😅😊😂
@ronb.1872
@ronb.1872 3 месяца назад
I agree with it
@grace_bweupe
@grace_bweupe 6 месяцев назад
Very helpful thank you
@loganbaker9866
@loganbaker9866 7 месяцев назад
This really cleared things up! Thank you! I was struggling to understand how the LP was separate from having an LLP.
@MrBrownies101
@MrBrownies101 8 месяцев назад
This was awesome, thank you!
@MaryLufino
@MaryLufino 8 месяцев назад
Brilliant explanation 👏👏
@parallelframes
@parallelframes 9 месяцев назад
Thank you
@subiazim4047
@subiazim4047 11 месяцев назад
Why do they have to give a confusing term to every scenario.....😮‍💨It is like the legal system deliberately comes up with terms like that to confuse a regular person, let alone a law student...
@subiazim4047
@subiazim4047 11 месяцев назад
THANK YOU!!!
@RLmediashow
@RLmediashow 11 месяцев назад
you're saving lives out here thank you so much for this explanation
@redbeardhomes
@redbeardhomes Год назад
Thank you from saving me from old english
@ahmedm.1259
@ahmedm.1259 Год назад
An absolute gem. Thanks!
@dovesrest9732
@dovesrest9732 Год назад
I believe that these arguments do not concern reality on the grounds that the nature of chattel and all enclosed are considered already in law, and defined by 'jurisprudence', a book I suggest reading. Whilst it is perhaps in the concern of that which is in rental and ''contract arrangement'' it does not - whilst I must say lightly without much thought; contain the nature of need to define fixtures and chattels. IN some ways I consider that chattels are a part of the descriptive of the nature of possession, as to describe that ''object'' which is in need of defined form for ownership. The example I have is that the chattel of ''ownership'' it self is attributing responsibility to that form. Then ownership as a functional word, means that it itself, forces change in the persons manifesto. Elsewise that nature of object is homeless and has no relationship to reality, then a wastrel of existence, being that it it self has been denied care or ''responsibility''. Be it that an object or a immaterial or a spiritual, wherever that house falls into being is its definition it is however not a fixture which relates directly to these same concepts. |Reading the book I have recommended should help some understand whilst I read it long ago now and struggle in my memory to place a detailed and confident response. It is however to me vital that the nature of chattel, compared to the reality of the chateaux, then as a castle to a man, provides its nature of power, it forcing in to the description of being, that is, it is a object of influence and effect, defines the nature of chattel, and its effect upon the people. How we work the hotel for example, influences the nature of the ownership of the hotel, the responsibility of the hotel upon the people. How we work the castle therefore, that it is the responsibility of the castle ''king'', to ascertain the influences of the ''chattel'' upon the people in the area of influence, then it is as the effect of responsibility. All affected by the nature of the castle itself. Whilst the nature of fixtures appears on the surface to me, lightly opinionated, to be referring to other issues without so much depth of thought. In fact I find fixtures to be a curious addition to the debate. Why we should have fire to be analysed when we cannot understand the stone remains to me to be a needless situation.
@BrandHubz
@BrandHubz Год назад
perfect
@MsAlexis
@MsAlexis Год назад
Priceless 💖
@MsAlexis
@MsAlexis Год назад
Thanks so much
@SuperMIKevin
@SuperMIKevin Год назад
What if the gift is a vacation at your property, where all expenses are paid and the property is not rented or transfered in any formal way?
@chloebarclay5272
@chloebarclay5272 Год назад
Thank you kind sir, this property law exam is going to be more scared of me tomorrow than I am of it! <3
@pygmy_leopard
@pygmy_leopard Год назад
But everytime i try them I always get multiple possibilities for the same answer and sometimes they all look like they're possible.
@kimmiexu9284
@kimmiexu9284 Год назад
Gosh, you need to be my prof!!!!!!! Thank you!
@discodarlingg
@discodarlingg Год назад
Super helpful, thank you!
@kajatecza4844
@kajatecza4844 Год назад
Law school lumberjack… saving crying 1L’s one view at a time!
@deepimpactMatt
@deepimpactMatt 2 года назад
Great explanation, thanks!
@hanaa3723
@hanaa3723 2 года назад
thanks for this
@vizzini539
@vizzini539 2 года назад
better than my professor. thanks.
@vikki8699
@vikki8699 2 года назад
Thank you, this was really helpful!
@zina8339
@zina8339 2 года назад
Wonderful video! Your videos are soooo informative and are helping me with my studies.
@shaungorham5479
@shaungorham5479 2 года назад
Georgia, Thanks.
@zina8339
@zina8339 2 года назад
Thank you!
@chirazsisserian4459
@chirazsisserian4459 2 года назад
Very helpful. Thank you so much.
@joelfriesen8880
@joelfriesen8880 2 года назад
Huge help man. Thank you!
@nadiaplawiuk8142
@nadiaplawiuk8142 2 года назад
This is awesome! Thank you Law School Lumberjack <3
@christinapapageorgakopoulo6329
@christinapapageorgakopoulo6329 2 года назад
NADIA STOPPPP IM SHITTING MYSELF IM HERE TOOOOO
@FrancoPhysique
@FrancoPhysique 2 года назад
This was very helpful! Thanks for the LSAT content.
@simbhiutiful
@simbhiutiful 2 года назад
This is great!
@simbhiutiful
@simbhiutiful 2 года назад
would you be able to do a case brief on both of these cases? We've been going through them in 1L and it would be really helpful to watch a case brief video
@lawschoollumberjack9754
@lawschoollumberjack9754 2 года назад
Hi Simran, as requested, here is a link to my newest video, briefing the Hunter Engineering case: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XB3WwSJYpAU.html
@simbhiutiful
@simbhiutiful 2 года назад
@@lawschoollumberjack9754 WOW THANK YOU SOOO MUCH!!!
@zina8339
@zina8339 2 года назад
Can you give a brief of the Hunter engineer case?
@lawschoollumberjack9754
@lawschoollumberjack9754 2 года назад
Hi Zinah, as requested, here is a link to my newest video, briefing the Hunter Engineering case: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XB3WwSJYpAU.html
@jenniferg.9017
@jenniferg.9017 2 года назад
Thank you so much for your videos- truly a life saver.
@eddy-fw7hv
@eddy-fw7hv 2 года назад
Hey this is actually a really good explanation
@song635
@song635 2 года назад
so helpful !
@locsceetv5467
@locsceetv5467 2 года назад
I wish it was explained a tad bit slower!
@nehalmahuli8121
@nehalmahuli8121 2 года назад
We can reduce the speed of the audio and listen to it.
@jenniferg.9017
@jenniferg.9017 2 года назад
Thank you, so much. I sighed in relief when I saw that you made a video on this because I was struggling with fully understanding the details. Much appreciated.
@anthoniaeko8835
@anthoniaeko8835 2 года назад
Thank you. Didn't understand the case when i read it, you made it clear
@decatrillionaire_tee.watso1451
@decatrillionaire_tee.watso1451 2 года назад
Oh no, :( where is the rest of your content? Keep going with these you were doing great.
@lawschoollumberjack9754
@lawschoollumberjack9754 2 года назад
Thank you very much for your kind words! Please find below a link to my newest LSAT Tips video. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_2SbjBY5gks.html I’ll be releasing a video on answering Flaw Questions likely next week (feel free to subscribe and turn on notifications so that you are notified once this video is live).
@surinderdatta7106
@surinderdatta7106 2 года назад
Very good presentation
@Fishstick220
@Fishstick220 2 года назад
Very helpful thank you
@benmcgraw3859
@benmcgraw3859 2 года назад
Are you talking about US or UK
@lawschoollumberjack9754
@lawschoollumberjack9754 2 года назад
Hi Ben, these are mostly Canadian cases
@benmcgraw3859
@benmcgraw3859 2 года назад
Are they generally the same in the US or radically different
@jenniferg.9017
@jenniferg.9017 2 года назад
Super helpful video!! Thank you so much, I understand the concept of resulting trust now! I might be wrong, I thought in Pecore v Pecore, the SCC did find that the father intended the gift and she got the sole claim on the joint account?
@lawschoollumberjack9754
@lawschoollumberjack9754 2 года назад
You are most welcome - I am glad it was helpful! I have re-reviewed the case, and you are absolutely right. I will need to update this video in due course. Thank you for raising this - much appreciated!
@nadiaplawiuk8142
@nadiaplawiuk8142 2 года назад
You are awesome!!!!
@SuperLobell
@SuperLobell 2 года назад
This is one of the most concise and helpful videos on this subject. Thank you! Are you continuing these for LSAT? I hope so! I see many more videos related to law school subjects.