@46:11 It's FALSE. It's a child of not more than SEVEN years found. A child of not more than SIXTEEN is by adoption. Article 6 (3) (4) of the 1992 Constitution.
The first comment I want to make is that there is no need to portray teachers as drunkards and violent people in order to make the salient law points. You could have said 'a young man'. It is sad that lawyers can in a programme aimed at making people to appreciate the law demonise a group of hard working and unappreciated people in their first sentence. I have been teaching since 1986. My salary has been delayed for years but I have never drank my back pay away or assaulted any woman because she rebuffed my advances. Please it is not enough to have a show. It is necessary to make sure that no member of society is portrayed in a negative way. I am surprised that lawyers can make such a rudimentary mistake. I am a teacher of over twenty years experience and I have never drunk away my back pay or assaulted a lady who rebuffed my advances. Is that what young lawyers do?
moderator you can't just say ''one is spoken and the other is written'', libel is in a permanent form usually written and the slander is in a spoken form.note ; there could be other permanent forms of defamation not only written.libel should not only be limited to a written form.
