@@liszt132 Thank you for watching!! Ch. F. G. Schwencke added one measure to Bach's original(added measure: 1:24-1:27). The added measures are written in such a way that the bass progresses chromatically while maintaining the original figure. This is the difference between Schwencke's version and original. As an aside, Ch. Gounod's Ave Maria was composed based on this version.
Nice piece, but if I'm not mistaken, a romance is written in 3/4 not 4/4- nice piece though. I'd change up the harmonies in some parts, specifically around the beginning, but it's a nice simple piece.
@@RetroRonin-nf1qg Thank you for watching! The knowledge that "romance is usually composed in 3/4" was lacking for me, so I will check and apply it in the future!
@@perritomusic10 Thank you for reply! When you have all the movements in shape, I will perform them if you don't mind! When I play symphonies, sonatas, and sonatinas on the piano, I like to work on all the movements. This is because there is often a hidden story that can only be told through all the movements.
@@Set-Upthetechnology Thank you for watching!! I kind of thought that way too. This is not a problem because I have no intention of making it my main business. I just do what I want to do, the way I want to do it. How much demand there is for it is not my concern. However, if you have an idea to improve the current situation of this channel, I would like to hear from you.
Its not bad as is, I would just add some more chords in the right hand to give it some more depth, as well as make it a little less repetitive (using some chords should help with that, note-wise at least). A solid Ragtime-esque piece already, but always room for improvement when it comes to composing. Good work :)
@@karlolewandowski You compose it very good, I am also a professional composer, I just want to know your age so I can know what is your copying level in
@@user-tl2oo8fg4r Thanks for the reply!! However, I would prefer not to reveal my actual age here. All I can say is that I composed this piece in 15 minutes when I was 18 years old.
@@memoryfound9208 Thank you for watching! Quite simply, it is because the part is not G minor. In this piece, from the third beat of the 8th measure to the 11th measure, it is partially in B♭ major. It is customary for the chromatic scale of this key to use G♭-F instead of F♯-F for the descent. Therefore, I used G♭ in the 10th measure instead of F♯.
@@memoryfound9208 Thank you for your reply, I appreciate it. Within my interpretation of music theory, the note in question resolves to F, not G, so G♭ instead of F♯ would be fine. Assuming this chord is D7/A, I think the chord needs to resolve to G or g. However, in the case of this piece, the chord resolves to a B♭ chord. In other words, if we focus on the component notes, F♯ or G♭ would resolve to F. If we include the perspective of the chromatic scale of the B♭ key from the other day here, it would be more natural to read the component note as G♭. (Also, to begin with, perhaps D/A would be more appropriate for this chord than D7/A. Because the C note in the D7 would have an unnatural resolution destination.) For these reasons, while using the D/A chord, I have notated F♯ as G♭. I would appreciate it if you could elaborate on any areas where my insight is lacking!!
@@karlolewandowskiF# makes more sense. You aren't really "resolving" anything with that Gb. Viewing it from above you are just putting more emphasis that it's a Bb-D-Gm by making it a Bb-D-Bb-D-Gm. It's a F# in the grand scheme of things
@@Ricardo7250 Thanks!! I guess I misunderstood some things. Your explanation helped me to realize that. I guess I need to learn a little more about music... At any rate, I am grateful to @memoryfound9208 and @Ricardo7250 for bringing to my attention some of my uninformed areas.
@@alessandropelizzoli6613 Thank you for watching! I'm very happy that you noticed that this piece is written in the form of 'Perpetuum mobile'. In my opinion, I named this 'Impromptu' because I thought that there could be a substantial 'Perpetuum mobile' named 'Impromptu', but in your opinion, is it different? If I'm uninformed, I would like to know!
@@karlolewandowskioh well, i think that giving the title of Impromptu could sound a bit strange because an Impromptu is literally a Composition that sounds like an improvisation, and usually an improvisation nowadays wouldn' t be conceived in such a structured and polyphonic way as you' ve done here...but this is only my opinion...
Amazing, great perpetual motion piece. Fast, dynamic and gives off enough of a melody to be considered a good work of art. I would describe it as a “Double Tarantella” since it’s in 12/8 instead of 6/8. Well done !
This is just fucking awesome man! I really liked it seriously! When I started I didn't even dream about "collabing" with someone, and let me tell you, YOU'RE THE CHAMP!
@@ThalesZettelMusique Thank you for watching!! Glad you liked it! I borrowed a part of your melody and changed the chords a bit. And I ended it in a way that would lead into your piece. I thought this way it would be the kind of prelude that would make your piece more engaging.
This prelude was composed for a piece by Thales von Zettel, so if you like, you can watch his piece after this score video. Mémoirs Op. 9-1 m.ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mlgixS-2TcI.html
Damn bro, really impressive! One thing I will say is try and keep four bar phrasing. Here, you start off good but change the phrase at bar ten instead of twelve of sixteen. It also might be a little deep and strong for a bagatelle but it definitely is good.
