Passionate about stereoscopic 3D and technology, by creating my channel a few years ago, I had this crazy idea to create comparison videos which I did not really believe in its concept and its popularity. But since the arrival of 4K content, it reminded me of my very first idea of comparing videos. So I said to myself, "why not relaunch this concept" but with quality and professional equipment to better accentuate my work and bring them real added value to my contents so that Internet users can benefit from the same media from their devices.
Technology is evolving at breakneck speed. And today I have the chance to work with professional tools like the NeoNano or with a Pro monitor intended only for my calibration station in 4K, software for HDR / Dolby Vision and many others .....
@@User-j5j3o Hi User About your question, I invite you to look on my wall where my profile is located on RU-vid. where it says "about" I explain to you what software and other accessories I use to make my comparisons. Thank you for your interest.
These versions truly suck in comparison to a test done by UPSCALE of which did exactly that by way of ai up resing techniques. Do a search for Akira upscale and be blown away by the results.
The part on the Blu-ray version that always got me was when Kelly and Sean at night we're going into the water and Mike came I started harassing them there was all pixels all over the screen it looked horrible even the DVD didn't have that problem
DNR + AI, absolutely no way. No matter how bad the 2016 Blu-ray was. Should never have made the 4K way in the first place, due to the over/under 3D shooting.
I would have the 4k right now if it had special features on it. I've seen the sharks don't die Jaws 3 documentary here on RU-vid...wish that was on it or something. All we got as an extra is the 3d version that is on the 2016 disc. A lot of people can't watch the 3d version because they don't have a 3d tv and 3d tvs are no longer on the market.
Looks like they zoomed out the image showing more picture info on all sides. I think the image quality is very good. I know there are some issues with the ai. I also noticed that some shots where the image was fuzzy on either side were improved somewhat. Yes I will be buying this.
This is not surprising since this film was designed especially for 3D. You should know that Joe Alves absolutely wanted this film with 3D effects. And that's why the 2D image isn't very good. For example, if we look particularly at the outlines of the characters. However, I would like to draw your attention to one element. This might interest you, but Jaws 3 was upgraded to 2D DI in 2015 and the picture is much more improved, especially in the 2016 3D edition.
I don't care what some youtubers say I don't care what people think. What is important is my personal opinion and I find that this edition is really good even if it was processed with or partially with A.I. So don't f...k me with people who are hateful a gainst this technology!!!!!!
Universal's attempt to squeeze blood out of a stone. They likely did this because due to how it was shot with thw two 3D images per frame, the movie never looked very good, so this was them trying to make it look decent on 4K in whatever way they can.
Always looking forward to your transfer videos. Looking forward to my copies coming in. I have never seen jaws 3 or 4. Seen the first one countless times. I enjoyed part 2 got it on Black Friday for $9.99. so yeah. Looking forward to it. What made me pull the trigger was the atmos mix. So whats your opinion on the PQ? Was A.I used? Another RU-vidr doesn't believe so because white specs are still showing up.
I'm going to be very honest with you. As always with AI, there are those who love it and those who hate it. Now, if you ask me directly, I will try to be as objective as possible. But very simple at the same time. Basically, if I had to get this 4K comic, I'd grab it, because so far it's the best pressing I've seen so far. And without counting Dolby Atmos which is in reality not pure Atmos sound, but the sound has been significantly improved and sometimes even impressive when you know the old edition. The soundscape is simply magical for a film that is almost 40 years old. However, the Atmos sound (which comes from the ceiling speakers) remains very timid and I think that is the negative point. Beyond that the image seems completely acceptable to me but once again it's my personal opinion. Thank you for your comment 👍🏻
@@Mymoonization that's good to hear. Of course we always want the best sound and picture quality possible...but we're all different. This might sound silly, I know I mentioned the Atmos mix when I don't even have an Atmos set up....but I do have a 7.1..and I can still hear the difference when the sound is remixed. Which is why I didn't mind paying full price right now. When I saw Jaws 2 only had the 2.0. I decided to wait
Honestly, the film could have been much better because I found the storyline fantastic. For several reasons that I will not mention for the moment. I find that this third part is doing much better than the fourth which is a total failure.
Perhaps, but I find that we are far too far from the previous three already that the third was relatively limited but more convincing than the fourth. Plus the shark following from Amity's journey to the Bahamas......come on it's hilarious !
4k looks terrible. I think most of the comments are from people that just want to have something that says 4k, but really doesn't make a difference in fidelity. The color grading looks awful. It's like the people behind making the 4K edition never heard of going back to take a look at the color grading of the original film. That's what 4K transfers should be, a faithful reproduction of the original theatrical release source material. Even if the negatives turned to dust, there are plenty of still from the film that was distributed in various forms. They just said, make it have the modern color grading and applied it to the entire movie and called it a day. This was definitely not done scene by scene. As for the sound, at the very least they should have given the option of having the one that they had on the Blu-ray version. They didn't have anything to do other than timing and adding it as an additional track. This was a lost opportunity.
