An international scientific hub, dedicated to the exchange of knowledge and the development of new ideas.
Our facilitation enables researchers from throughout the world to unite, establishing new collaborations, exploring both new and shared ideas and expertise, while working together on site.
The IPa is open to a wide range of scientific communities, including theorists and experimentalists, encouraging the participation of biologists, chemists, mathematicians, physicists, researchers in earth and space sciences, as well as in computer sciences and engineering, with the aim of facilitating exchanges and collaborations between the different disciplines, as well as at their interfaces with the human and social sciences.
Both light and electromagnetic waves are called waves. Is the wave going out from point A to point B? Or is it already at points A and B like the sea, but only the waves are transmitted? In modern science, it seems to be seen as the former... / What about time and space? In modern science, time and space are the latter, don't you think? / In other words, space-time comes first, and light, photons and protons go along that path... / So the Einsteinian school's absolute speed of light is strange? At the absolute speed of light, is not the speed determined by light, but by the time and space that already exists? Isn't speed the time to move from point A to point B? If time and space are not absolutely fixed, why does the speed of light have absolute speed? / Therefore, the absolute speed of light can also be wrong. Isn't the absolute speed of light a space-time dimensional barrier? If it exceeds the absolute speed, will it jump to another dimension? / Einstein's theory is based on the dimension only now, so if you go beyond this dimension, is not it beyond the constraints of Einstein? / The question is whether you can find an object faster than light or accelerate light. Or is space-time and massive mass spread out in front of us, and can not we cross the space-time dimension using space-time and massive mass? / In this sense, I think we should study whether there is a way to send signals to the past. You don't have to worry about who in the past will get this signal, do you? We're already receiving a 24-hour signal from radio telescopes and various receivers.
If we go deeper... Light has a slower speed as it passes through the medium. / It is not that we can not accelerate light, but is not the absolute speed of light the highest speed of light observed in our dimension? / Is not it observable only at a constant speed in the dimension we are in? / If we accelerated the light at all, for example, if we shot light on a spacecraft, or if the light of the sun already moving at a high speed exceeded the observable absolute speed, would not it have passed to another dimension? / Whether there are eleven dimensions, or even larger dimensions, is not there necessarily a overlap with our dimension in the end? / Would not light or radio waves that went to another dimension come back to our dimension as slow as passing through the medium? / Can't we do an experiment like this?
One is reminded of Kolmogorov’s result for what he defines as hilbert space to be: That they have the peculiar property of being isomorphic to subspaces of itself.
That indian guy: He needs to make his concern very clear….. The use of infinite dimensional hilbert spaces has many mathematical intentions that go into it….. So an automotive person…. Could have an actual reason, for trying to talk about a finite dimensional hilbert space: Is that the nature of the harmonic oscillator? No. But this is canonical QM, so that’s not inappropriate to be restricting a concern for different mathematical vocabulary for this concept of QM to the case of the harmonic oscillator. @11:46
Yeah, but is there a need? Unifying things can imply all types of desirability. Shall we unify the milk and the chicken noodle soup? Black holes is one object…., but more practically: My Hundai Sonata is working fine! And the electronic computer portion of it is telling me, that the pressure in the four wheels is - 35 psi ……. 35 psi 15 psi …….. 35 psi. The automotive guy is being rather unhelpful: implying I’m just unlucky. One is sincerely desirous of knowing what the nature of this worrisome event literally is: Namely, if the gravitational position of this car on some of these tilted streets is uncomfortable for the car, then this could be a sincere problem that begs analytical precision in exactly this sense. However, if there’s a quantum mechanical cause for this event: I would suspect the computer is telling me something…. There is no intelligent way of knowing there is a causally relevant ‘air leak’: all processes could be called an air leak! Absolutely disgraceful - the guy claiming he deserves a penny for that job. Its sincerely more sensible to place ones worry on the computer that is in charge of beeping, spawning notifications, … saying many things. Meaning there is no sincere change in pressure: in this context where pressure has, truly, a very specific meaning: ‘Defined’ by a human event that counts this reading as something of a alternative definition for something that is mathematically talked about as an intrinsic quantity-of-nature. One can consider the perturbation that is called the vector of stress.
