(I decided not to put this with my other comment since it was too big) This isn't really a complaint but just a general misconception that people have about the way NATO Works. NATO is a complex and complicated alliance. But the way most people know it is the "Funny North American and European Alliance that if you attack one guy in that alliance almost all of Europe and North America at war with you" But that couldn't be more wrong. NATO has multiple procedures and action plans that it would put into use before Article 5 would need to be invoked. Article 5 is sort of a last-ditch effort once all other action plans & security procedures have failed or are exhausted. NATO has and still does assign action plans to specific countries in an area or with some quality for them to collaborate and work on an action plan if a scenario occurs on one of their soil (E.G. the Baltic states may be assigned an action plan exclusive for them to use in case Russia attacked them.) There are HUNDREDS of these and there's 100% a NATO action plan for if Greece and Turkey got into a war that likely wouldn't require Article 5.
I do like this video and your content, but I want to list some things I don't think would happen realistically - Ukraine probably would not collapse after NATO enters a conflict. Sure, they probably wouldn't receive that many supplies anymore but they prob wouldn't collapse. - Greece would also last longer against Turkey. Although Turkey is MUCH stronger, it would still be able to resist a bit longer than that - Why would there be "Pro-Turkish Rebels" in France? I know French people don't like their government, and there would def be Turkish supporters, but they and Turkey are WAY different, and I doubt rebels would occur. Let alone winning - The U.S. would NOT have lost much stability due to fighting with Turkey They were only in the first half of the war for just a couple months and are the most powerful country in the world. Fighting Turkey for only 4 months would probably only put a small dent into the United States military capability at most - France wouldn't be partitioned. It would be restored back to normal. There would be no reason to partition it.
Alright.... Let's see... This definitely in sandbox mode. Because pumping out that many troops by playing normally in turn 1 is impossible. Even with scenario editor. And it's extremely zoomed in. Awkward to watch. Total rating: 2/10 for effort. Playing normally will pump this up to 7/10. Using the minor nations (while playing normally) will give you a 10/10.
I'm trying to see what WORKS FOR ME AND THE AUDIENCE THE BEST. I always get these types of comments, and it's stupid. What about it being zoomed in? Who gives!? And I play in sandbox because I don't want to spend 4 hours on a video that probably won't even break 400 views! It's not worth the effort, so how about you keep your 2/10s to yourself, please?
@@GodzillaBro2019 dude, calm down. I'm only giving a suggestion. If you're that upset just say it calmly and I'll stop. Don't make a big deal out of it.
2 years ago when you were using this app your animations were mid but now and days they are as good as the ones displayed on the official site for that app
we just reacted to your video. Great video, though it may not be entirely accurate. Ae you Turkish by chance. You should make a reaction video to our reaction infinite content glitch. Am i right?
