i dont get it (Minute 06:32 upper left corner). in the test 100% infill has 117kg till broke and 75% has 150kg. In the Chart at the ende the 100% infill is the strongest. i dont understand... thx for testing.
Please test "cubic" "cubic subdivision" and "gyroid" infill. They are 3d and must have homogeneous toughness in all directions. You can find them in cura slicer.
You could tell where the ABS would fail even before the press had touched it as when you looked at the corner where it locks in to the testing fixture the layer lines were all bunched up meaning, it was not a great print from a structural stress point of view IMO, you'd have to do 5 each then average it out the results to get a fairer comparison.
it looked like there was less than 100% infill on a carbon which type is unknown. it would be nice to know what type it was? the polycarbonate look like it was 100% infill.
Another amazing thing is that the Polycarbonate did NOT break at the middle like the Carbon did which clearly without a shadow of a doubt prove that Polycarbonate is MUCH more stronger than Carbon. Now if only I could get a polycarbonate penis transplant to replace my flaccid weiner I would make the lady's at my local whorehouse very happy. 😊🤭😁
Hello. Can I use a fragment of this video on my swim channel? I will add the name of your channel in the video itself and in the description I will add links to your RU-vid.
"Carbon" is not a 3D printer material. This video is useless without knowing just what type of filament the "carbon" is matrixed with. For that matter - brand and blend makes a difference too, even for the 'polycarbonate' since pure PC has an insanely high print temperature - much higher than any of the commonly sold "PC filaments, which are all blended to make a better and easier to print with.
Based on the numbers and behaviors of the "carbon", I would guess it is nylon ( PA12CF15 ) but anyhow, I would also like to know.... this video isn't useful without that very basic piece of information.
PLA = 37 MPa tensile strength. ABS = 27 Mpa. How do you explain that your test resulted in almost 3 times the load for ABS? I suspect you aren’t controlling your variables and measuring equipment very well
Not sure either, but I do notice that most information you see on RU-vid channels test the materials mostly by tensile strength. Pulling on the printed hooks. I clicked on this video because I was looking for impact resistance no tensile strength.
This is a mix of compression and flexure and unfortunately the fast rate of compression is likely far from quasi-static loading, so it borders on an impact test as wel
