Here at the University of Cambridge Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology (CEB), we are using fundamental science to drive positive change in society.
We want to understand physical, chemical and biological processes, from the molecule, up to the system. How do we treat an ageing population? How do we provide affordable renewable energy to meet demand? How do we make consumer products more sustainable?
Through our undergraduate and postgraduate courses, and underpinning all of our cross-disciplinary research, we are committed to solving some of the world's biggest challenges.
Wonderful work, well done and good luck finding a solution to the problem. I wonder if there's a way to plug into the raw energy of trees - imagine if a forest was not only a way of capturing carbon, but was also an energy source without having to burn the wood to generate power? Obviously I speak as someone who knows nothing...
So what you are saying is that Steve Rogers was injected with gold nanoparticles of a certain type, shape, coating etc. along with penicillin and irradiated with a certain light frequency to stimulate and maintain growth which was then amplified even further with the symbols worn on his chest and arms? A star i believe which focuses energy into the middle of the star and susbsequently into his body? Why not just say that to begin and dispense with the theatrics
Gold nanoparticles is a popular dissertation topic in theoretical chemistry anyways. Lots of grad students write that one up and rename their variables whatever their advisor wants to see.
Sorry for too many questions during the presentation Shana. I used to work with Chris Cramer so I knew some things about your research that you hadn't thought about. I gave it 100% because I couldn't think of anything wrong with it.
Shana Banana did surface energy calcs by integrating Jablonski diagrams. Jablonski diagrams are the first gradient of potential energy surfaces. Chris Cramers TA taught me that. Shana dissertation could have been done in reverse and same mathematical result occurs.
I want to point out that you also showed that co2 saturates the more you add. That was seen in the temp that it began to stabilize & this is the veracity is that after an initial lukewarm rise, further co2 will not roast the atmosphere.
47:15 Well... the issue isn't about market competition but the underlying reliablity for long term application. We can't wait 5-10 years 🤔 to get the data for practical application in space colonies, there has to be a larger scale case study, now. 🧐 let's not let petty things like governments and commercialism slow human progress. 🤌🏾
25:29 That's cool. So in theory, the material could be used as a vehicle wrap? Which means with 360 camera tech could also create a new form of camouflage... dare i saw, invisibility cloak. 🤗
22:30 Yeah! Space stations can have their own manufacturing process on ground and cars that require charging stations can easily have solar installed without a lot of extra work. Lot's of applications.
20:00 I wonder 🤔 if this material can be made into flexible layers, could it be added onto electrical vehicles like they do with vinyl wraps? 🤔 since the tech is moving so fast there has to be a way to merge the status quo with the changing 'upgrades' otherwise we'll have a large waste issue...
CO2 has double the heat conductivity compared to air, so for the same duration the CO2 will absorb more heat than the air flask. More heat thus, higher temperature. If you have equipment to measure energy input into different flask, then you will see CO2 flask absorbed almost double the energy compared to the air flask at the same duration. This experiment only proves that CO2 has higher conductivity than air. Nothing at all about greenhouse gas global warming.
The sound quality is very poor. Please voiceover, with more energy! See how they make exiting educational videos in Up and Atom and Dr Becky etc. This is a good intro to the subject, but has no details of what you did in your project. Perhaps follow-up with a part 2 to say what you did. The subject is very current and interesting. Can PV and BPV systems be combined by having moss cells made of PV material?
I've got to say that I was a bit disappointed in your demonstration as I was looking for a demonstration of the mechanism of global warming. Look, I'm a homeless guy with few resources, but could you guys not set up something a bit more sophisticated than this? I mean, there was no discussion of WHY the CO2 absorbed energy: you don't specify what the light frequencies are. Can you not set something up that shows first: higher frequency light passing through CO2 and NOT affecting it, then introducing a surface which transforms it into infrared, and the effect on temperature?
What was the PPM of CO2 you added to the flask. I am guessing 500,000ppm + compared to the other flask with a CO2 level of around of 400ppm- this really illustrates nothing of significance. You get the same results with Argon in a flask and this is not a greenhouse gas.
Exactly! These GROSSLY exaggerated experiments are meaningless. Humans have only added 0.014% CO2, or 1.4 parts per 10,000 parts total atmosphere. Replicate that in an experiment. Until then, these 'scientists' are just plain morons.
Never heard anyone say Doo-_o_-den-um (emphasis on 2nd syllable) before. Fairly sure it's doo-o-_dee_-num in the US and jew-o-_dee_-num (emphasis on 3rd syllable) in British English dictionary.cambridge.org/us/pronunciation/english/duodenum
1) By reflecting away 30% of ISR the albedo, which would not exist w/o the atmosphere/GHGs, makes the earth cooler than it would be without that atmosphere like that reflective panel set behind the windshield. Remove the atmosphere/GHGs and the earth would become much like the Moon and Mercury, a barren rock with a 0.1 albedo, 20% more kJ/h, hot^3 on the lit side, cold^3 on the dark. Nikolov, Kramm (U of AK) and UCLA Diviner mission all tacitly agree. 2) the GHG up/down welling, “trapping”/”back” radiating/delaying/intercepting, 100 % efficient, perpetual warming loop requires "extra" energy which according to RGHE theory comes from 3) the terrestrial surface radiating that "extra" energy as a LWIR ideal black body which 4) cannot happen because of the non-radiative heat transfer processes of the contiguous atmospheric molecules and as demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ 1+2+3+4 = 0 Greenhouse Effect + 0 Greenhouse gas warming + 0 man caused climate change. Version 1.0 040221
Just wanna ask, i will attend the poster presentation organized by RSC.. Is it can we present without verbally? Bcoz i'm quite confuse.. I plan to present my poster like yours, just use animation