She was given one of the greatest opportunities she can possibly get, and then she ask questions that their answers exist in his books. "What was your dream when you were in your 20s? how did you achieve it?" shows that all she cares was how to be like Obama. I'm disappointed to see another Cambodian fucked up again.
I agreed, Man. She is dumb and she did not have a vision for the people and the country. She should have asked "What can you do to help us to remove dictator out off Cambodia, or how can you help the helpless one, or promote freedom and democracy in Cambodia. What can I tell you, Man. I am, and we all are living the Dream... But in Cambodia ...people don't know how to dream or live their lives ... If I have the chance, I would have asked, Mr. President, please help me oppressed the Oppressors in Cambodia.
Are you deaf? the question was "What was your dream when you were in your 20s?DID YOU ACHIEVE IT? how did you achieve it?" And the main part of the question for me is if he really achieved it.His answer should be NO.So her question was perfect but his answer wasnt obviously...
We are being fooled by low morality of capitalists. I find this is a lie and simply religious stand point. I maybe agree if he mentions the determination and hard work to reach the goal while aiming higher and generating wealth. So why we are being fooled? Simply because we are poor and the middle class people? If we want to be clearer, why we are still poor, we for sure need to consult with economists.Thomas Piketty, a brilliant French author who recently wrote Capital in the 21st Century, makes him the ''rock star'' economist and the best seller of Amazon. It is written clearly that economic growth is always smaller than the profits from the invested money. We are all entitled to profits from such an economic growth, but any profits from the invested money accrue only to the rich.This is such a problem we all see and experience anywhere in the world these days, and one should not agree more. The American dream, a national ethos and set of ideals of which hard work will produce freedom of opportunity for prosperity and success is now less relevant. People will find it hard to catch up with the few rich because those who have family fortunes are the winners. Those poor may have a shot of luck if they marry into or inherit money. This means to me that economic growth of a nation is determined by the few rich and if the poor are lucky enough, they probably can catch up with the same rate as economic growth. However, no one can ever catch up with the rich since they grow their fortunes in a much faster rate. In sum, the poor play economic lottery to seek lucks in life while the rich play a sure stance. Therefore, we are all being fooled by an idea that we are living a complicated financial system that has changed a thing. Importantly, we are not only struggling with inequality of wealth, but also the inequality of opportunity. This seems not new and applicable to anywhere around the world and as good as fact.
