Finding and preserving video artifacts with a focus on farm equipment
I'm always on the look out for more tapes on tractors and other farm machinery!!
VHS tapes shown can be bought at my ebay store "Bargain Bin Records"
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL VIDEOS POSTED ON THIS CHANNEL REMAIN THE SOLE PROPERTY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS. ANY CONTENT OWNERS WHO WANT ANY VIDEOS REMOVED ARE ENCOURAGED TO SEND A PERSONAL MESSAGE DIRECTLY TO ME AND I WILL REMOVE THEM IMMEDIATELY.
I love this! I've never seen any promotional videos for Cub Cadet from this era and frankly wasn't even sure if any were out there, so this is a real treat! Do you have any more Cub Cadet (or any brand) Lawn & Garden tractor promotional videos from the 80s/90s? I did see the 2000 Series video on your channel as well.
Funny enough the magnum was going to be the next generation 88 series for IH until they got bought. Everything on that tractor is IH except for 3 or 4 things that were case parts
@@LanceStoddard you are correct after doing a bit of research the engine part is true (my apologies), the transmission was going to be part of the new 88 series but it reworked by the company but everything else I said was true the frames, cab, electronics, hydraulics, etc was IH due to them having better technology (quoted from Case engineers) so it was more 25% Case and 75% IH Source: Red Tractors by Lee Klancher
@@masterchief2182 I love IH but...the new CaseIH company put together a team of both Case and IH men and spent two years on designing the powershift to upgrade the Tri-six design. Although everything fit in the old IH castings nicely, the electronics and valving were new. Assigning percentages of who did what is probably impossible. Patents from four different companies were used on the Magnum. IH, Case, CaseIH, Cummins, CDC. Opps, Five different entities! As for it being 75 percent IH, I would love to agree but...The engine was CDC, which is a big percentage of the tractor. It also took two years to design and test the trans upgrade post IH which is kind of disrespectful to the work done by those people to say it was an IH trans, when it was a CaseIH trans. I mean really, who cares? A lot of people worked very hard over many years to develop the Magnum. Thank them all.
Those woods mowers seem to be cool. at 2:12 I like that woods uses a 2nd gen Dodge Ram those are cool trucks when they are stock and not modified. They simply look better stock.
This is a cool video back when Cub Cadet made good lawn tractors they still make a good Zero Turn now I want the Diesel garden tractor. Those little Japanese Kubota diesel engines are tough. The American Kohler and Briggs engines in those mowers was made back when American small engines were super reliable. Those Hondas cub compared to are cool also. I got a 3813 I plan to restore.
Ironically CaseIH is accusing Caterpillar of the thing they exactly did.CaseIH introduced a product that no one was asking for to when they introduced their quadtrac in 1996.All farmers do not need a quadtrac to.In terms of their products Caterpillar dwarfs CaseIH.Period.There are place on this planet where can find many many Cat products but a single red CIH one
I renmber when dad came home in 1990 with a brand new kverland wrapper one or 2 farmers said it wouldn't take off and by 1998 she had wrapped 100000 bales and we bought a taraph bio baler she did till 2002 we had one more until 2005 then we swapped to fusion and stayed that way since but kverland wrappers where great I only did 2 seasons on her as I wasn't old enough
The only thing they don't want to admit is, the CASEIH could not combine wheat or small grains with weeds in the field. The conventional style of the deere could handle the weeds and work through those fields without plugging. Secondly, the deere can be set to clean the grain better than the CASEIH and throw less out the back of the machine. I should know because I ran a lot of 9600 combines from 92-97. The 9000 series had suspension seats comparable to the John Deere 8000 series tractors. The real truth is, neither combine had a major advantage over the other no matter what they say
Good point, however the gleaner r series takes the cake for chewing through weeds. IH for clean grain. Gleaner for organic/high weed content. John deere for parking in a hedgerow with a motor full of water.
You are so wrong we run iH since 1982 on the wheat run and over the years I have had countless number of johndeere guy tell me how they just can't get there depressed to do has good of job has our rotory are doing i have had more than one deere cutter tell me they get it close and then just don't look in the grain tank or on the ground so I ask why do you stay with the john deer they all said the same thing because deer had a better finance program that was the only reason they run john deer it had nothing to do with the jobs it did because they knew iH was better it because johndeere made it easier to buy them.
@@snowman5609 like I said at the end of my comments, no manufacturer had an advantage over the other until John Deere came out with the X9 1100. The AF11 was the first time CASEIH had a major advantage over John Deere. You may think otherwise, but unless you know the facts, your bias is just one sided
That opening about JI Case wanted to make me throw up, there would have been no C/IH or CNH if IH would have not been for sale, you would have had nothing more than a skidsteer and backhoe builder with JI Case, their Ag stuff was lacking, and had NO combine until they poched IH's combine.
LOL, this is the era I was farming in... 78 we switched from a 915 to New Holland for the twin rotors, seed business, made all the difference... We ran a TR70 then a TR85 but back to IH in 80,,, Dealer support... I farmed through to a 2588... Simple amazing machines!!!
