Great flow man! You look like you may have some skills. Not sure I would have figured that out on my own. Way to think thru the problem and thanks for giving us a better chance to survive this scenario. More Please??? I know this warrior. He's 100% the real deal -🤙🦾😎TSOG-GUY
If it's unloaded, it's unloaded, until it comes time to double check for the next period of time (when the firearm has been put down for a few minutes for example). There comes a point where professionalism, trust and experience allow those who and trained to use potentially dangerous tools stop fearing a bullet materialising out of thin air. Some of us live in a world where taking risks in a highly calculated manner is a way of life. Where doing the unthinkable can become the only option in the blink of an eye. Those hamstrung by essentially being slaves to dogmatic ways of trying to negate inexperience and lack of knowledge will falter. That's fine, leave it to the professionals, that's what they're there for.
Awesome stuff. You never know. You could be in your house trying to get to your family. You have seconds to get to them. Way too long for 911 your safety is your responsibility.
Absolutely, this is why we team so many 1 man CQB techniques. We get so many people that question when 1 man would make sense and this is exactly why. Great comment!
Man, thanks for the comment! Yes this is such a crappy scenario to be in but if you just apply a few basic principles, you change the odds drastically.
This ultra-christian-nationalistic approach is embarrassing. What are you training for? Nothing. But I bet you say you're training to protect America.... When you know damn well the only thing you're protecting is the only waffle house near your duplex
This would definitely depend on how much you can process and how much time you have depending on the type of threat. If you need to rush because someone is in immediate danger, a center check and then clear as you enter may be the best approach. If you have more time, yes, panning back to the other side may be better. Great question! Thanks
Preferably, the way we do it in the army you have to stack up on the wall 2-4 ft away from it. Since the door is open in this senario, first man stays and holds point aimed at the door frame while second man would too aim at the doorframe who controls first man since second man would be behind him with his barrel over his outer shoulder and when they breach they buttonhook and move in at the same time bringing two barrels in the room at once and it eliminates that fatal funnel and your not ultimately flagging your buddy this way or sparing a single second at achieving your corner not with your weapon up while your first man clears it by himself. You both clear your sector and corners at the same time and reach your point of domination. Once second man clears his sector, he turns around and pulls security to the rear in which case the door frame and outside
Both would have been killed. How can you look at the left corner while holding a rifle in your left hand? This can be avoided by taking the weapon in your right hand. I have 16 years more experience than men. They would both go to sleep in this room.
Good Stuff! One thing, with the righty or lefty question dealing with a 1 man entry to center-fed, it does actually matter. Less with a pistol at full extension, but definitely with a rifle, whichever side you have the weapon on, THAT is the side you want to be exposing to the threat first, which may change which entry angle you want to enter with. Least exposure possible before barrel can align with threat.
Training with live rounds would be the most effective way to learn for the firefights...or blanks...since humans are sadly that easy to take down... @@CheckmateTrainingGroup
