Ok, so let me explain exactly why the questions were asked cause I think there is confusion here. For me, I understand Marxism really well; it is so simple. Basically, the intersection of Neo-Marxism as an ideology subversion cult bubble is creating this false sense of evil and good. In other words, in their brainwashed ideology, because of the obvious - being from the New York Times - belonging to a brainwashed institution or w/e you want to call the New York Times, in their mind, the Russians are bad, and Ukrainians are good, and obviously the Kazakh are good. So basically, they are confused about what tone they should put in the reports of the post-game. It is not a joke. Basically, if ideology tells them that X is evil, they have to act as if they are facing evil, and if it is good, they act as if it is good. Most intersections with Neo-Marxism go by default, like gender or the colour of your skin, where you are born, if you are from the West or not and so on. You can be from the outside and still be evil, but you have to know that it intersects with your brainwashed ideology. So, for example, Russia or Israel is bad. Normally Japan should be bad in their ideology, but the control of the subversion regarding Japan requires a brainwashed mind and more than 2 neurons, so some knowledge of history, and that's usually harder while inside the bubble unless someone tells you that Japan colonised something to teleport the country into the intersection with evil. I know it does sound very weird to most of you, but if she is Russian or Kazakh, it is of extreme importance inside the Neo Marxist Ideology Subversion Cult Bubble. It is sad, but that's basically what Western people learn in Universities.
The sports media are basically a bunch of disgusting people who are probing for a front page story, or some controversy. She represents Kazakhstan in tennis because the country supported her. She is still Russian FFS, why can't they get their head around this. These tennis pros are on the road for most of the tennis season so a home base doesn't apply, yet alone a home country
C'est dommage que ce n'est pas moi qui réponde à cet interview, j'aurai accroché dans ma cave trois journalopes britanniques avec plaisir et trois journalopes américains avec le sourire. Zut zut je rate toujours les bonnes occasions ! 😇🤣🤪
Not a single question about tennis. These journalists should be banned from covering tennis events, they are more interested in politics than the sport
She was not getting the support she needed to succeed in her career from Russia. She's a tennis player who was offered a lifeline by Kazakhstan. What is the girl supposed to do? Work at McDonalds? She's not breaking any rules, get off her back. She handled these horrid questions with grace and class. And she has a fantastic game.
I understood the ball had to be replayed for completely different reasons than thise given by the chair. I understood that the bad line call which was an odd challenge from Sabalenka would mean the first serve would have to be played again because of the bad call. So Sabalenka gives the first serve back to Rybakina - would Rybakina have challenged if Sabalenka had not have challenged? Imho Sabalenka should have accepted she wouldn't have got near the ball and (due to her challenge) accept the ball was in and thus chair can award the point to Rybakina. A lack of awareness by the chair and imho lack of sporting behaviour from Sabalenka means the only option is for the point to be replayed but by then the game has been interrupted. All those lines people and tech and still doesnt help the players have a good game.
Where was the moderator : the question has been asked and answered : Yes, she was born there. No, there are no ties. No, she cannot control what Russia is, will and won't say or do. She has been under Kazakh flag since 2018 (6+ years), give it a rest already -- ask something more pertinent.
