suppose a video is shot @ 120 fps with Ss of 240th of a second And it is played back after converting to 24 fps @ 1/48 Ss speed in Adobe premiere Will it gove same result or it will be a super slow motion video
Good video. There is a lot of incorrect information being pushed by "experts" online. One big problem I see a lot is that some people don't understand that 30 fps progressive doesn't have the same kind of motion look as 30 fps interlaced (which looks like 60fps because it has ~60 interlaced fields per second). So they'll incorrectly tell people to shoot at 30p to get a "realistic TV look". To be fair, nowadays there is TV content shot in 30p, but it doesn't give you the traditional motion look of live television, which captures and displays twice as many points in time and looks more like real life. I even saw one "expert" the other day explain in a video that 24p looks like real life and 60p looks unnatural, which is pretty much the opposite of the truth. 60p doesn't look "unnatural", it just doesn't look like a film, which can be jarring when you expect your video to look like a film (and can sometimes remind people of cheaper kinds of videos shot in 30i), but it actually looks more like real life than 24p. Of course, it's about time for interlaced video to be phased out; 60p has been pretty widely available for like 13 years now, and it ought to be the new standard for shooting non-filmic video, or even filmic video sometimes, if you plan on converting the frame rate to 24p in post (which would require certain special considerations regarding shutter speed and/or motion blur plugins, but is doable).
Watching this vid for the second time and I bought one! It’s glued to my GX8 Lumix and I love it! Shooting black & white and it’s brilliant. Highly recommended✌️🇦🇺
If you are a professional working in advertising or film or you simply want your shots to convey the right feeling and emotion in the scene (it's usually the 180-degree rule, as our eyes see that way) then you definitely want to use the 1/50 shutter angle. If you are experimenting or testing things out, or you are simply someone who is in the learning process the sky is the limit.
I suspect that the actual problem this is all about is that whatever all the textbooks say, 24 or 25 fps is not enough to create the illusion of a smooth movement. It is just a historical compromise between what was feasible (and economic) and what would look nice. That is why fast moving subjects look "shaky" and the motion blur is masking that to make the video look (more) acceptable. When you switch to 50, 60 or even 120 fps, you do not need this crutch and moving subjects look better even with high shutter speeds. At 120 fps, you can use even 1/2000s (which is what you often get on a bright sunny day with f/2.8) and the movement still looks nice and smooth, even if the "shutter angle" is much smaller than with 1/50s at 25 fps (unless the movement is extremely fast). High frame rates may not be always available for presentation or publishing but then it depends on how smart the software resampling the video to slower frame rate is. If it just picks every second (fourth, fifth) frame, the result is just as problematic as if you were shooting with fast shutter speed at 25 fps from the start. If it is smarter, though, it can combine multiple frames together to give you that motion blur workaround for the slow frame rate. But as usual, it's easy to lose the information but you cannot create it from nothing; so it's IMHO better to shoot at higher frame rate and resample down when needed.
i respect that you shouted out the guy that helped you realize you might not be correct. and then you go ahead and try again to get it right. we need more people like you man! i love my dji spark! thanks for the video. ✌️🤙
If you don’t care about a deep depth of field, you can just increase f-stop and leave the shutter at two times the frame rate for a natural motion blur.
What would you do if you have a camera that does not support 1/50 for 25 fps but only either 1/25 or 1/100? I usually record driving fast in cars from inside the car. I have found that too much shutter speed mess up the motion blur. Your thoughts? I prefer either 24 or 25 fps.
For 60p use shutter 60, not 120. Because playing in normal speed of 30p timeline - it gives shutter of 60 (because every second frame is dropt) But in slow mo it gives better motion blur. 🎉
Hi Tom, I am an architect and I dont have video making software so I made slide show of 650 frames (long render 2 days) thro a bridge design, this I bring into Adobe premier pro 2019, where I put transitions between the frames to mask the shake, from one image to another, I am happy to share files if needed, the cut video looks ok, but still frame to frame there is a jump, looking thro the net tutorials I found the Wrap stabilizer, my case is dealing with shake between frames so there is no jumps, and not on the actual frame, and this is where your expertise is requested what to do, my images are still images and they are good rendered 3D images, due to not having Twinmotion, or Lumios software which would give smooth video, I am creating my own video and in the result have a frame to frame problems, Thanks in advance Alex
I've been shooting interviews 25fps and 1/50 on sony fs5 but I've been disappointed in some of the video quality. I find way too much motion blur on some occasions. Will interviews still look natural at higher shutter speeds? 1/100 and beyond
I'm a little worried about the shutter speed of 4000 in 4k with my zve10 Can it do any damages to shutter ? I mean something is moving 4 thousand times in one second that's why I'm worried about it
Nothing is moving at 4000 times a second. The shutter speed is 1/4000th of a second meaning that , with a mechanical shutter it is only open for that length of time once. Video does not use a mechanical shutter, it is done electronically. The shutter speed relates to how quickly the camera sensor grabs the image. So at for instance 24fps, the sensor only registers light and movement for approx 1/167th of a second for each frame.
I don’t really care about slow motion. I’m just trying to get clear video of fast moving objects. How can you film these objects and not have them to blurry and have smooth clear video at the same time. My phone looks cleaner than my new R3???
You are so right! ND filters for run-n-gun work are a pain - use a higher shutter speed and add motion blur back in post... It is easy for Resolve to create very realistic motion blur from a too sharp image if needed (It is always easier to 'degrade' an image than to try to sharpen one that has too much blur to begin with...)
