With Parker v South Eastern Railway, how can it be fair that these terms were presented after the ticket was purchased (as the terms were on the reverse of the ticket)?
is DR only applicable to insanity plea's or are there other scenarios where it can be used? (I am starting A-Level Law in a few months, no education yet so could be stupid question)
DR is only available as a defence to murder. It is a different defence to insanity, which can be a defence to other crimes (not just murder). If you watch my insanity video, this might make it clearer for you.
This does not cover what's going on at my place. If a landlord refuses to make repairs and you become injured or ill, the landlord is responsible. If there were no landlord, then whomever was claiming ownership and making repairs, would be liable. Break and enters would not fall under this either.
Hi - Great informative video... As part of the application process or interviews, is there any written exams/tests or written answers that you have to supply, or is it all verbal? I'm very keen on applying, have already 'sat in' on a couple of court sessions for 'observation'. I'm semi retired, held senior managerial position and have been involved with disciplinaries, grievances, ET's and national wage negations with Unions... so used to understanding investigations and contradictory information etc.... However I'm concerned about the application process/written tests etc. Thanks for your help.
Off the top of my head: someone watching video or a person being attacked online and doing nothing, not reporting this, particularly if they repeatedly go back and watch The same goes for employers who do not file reports against employees who create circumstances where someone will be injured, (leave any part of building or living quarters unrepaired, if requiring to live in quarters for work) Looking the other way on attacks, sexual harassment, and violation of privacy would qualify as well.
No clue why there aren't any comments here. This definitely helped me a lot on the essay plan 'Is it fit for its purpose or should it be reformed?' Awesome-sauce video!
I applied for other jobs. I don't want to be lumped into a false narrative based on abject LIES that fits into someone else's futuristic agenda that is antithetical to what I believe is God's plan for my life. That being said: I never met Hunter Biden, have not been in New York since 2018 (one time in early 2018), In addition: This is neither a solicitation nor an invitation, this Is the truth. I am and have been completely abstinent for almost eight years here in Philadelphia PA USA.05-22-2016 (later) to 06-13-2024-06-14-2024 (over 419 weeks)so far, unless you include leap years) through September 8 so far or whenever this stops. My eldest son (who is diagnosed with a disability) is still a virgin (to my absolute very best knowledge), and my youngest son is married and had a baby girl with his wife. 05-23-2016 (while I was running for Congress)-06-13-2024 to 06-14-2024, nor do we have STI's or STD's, no Cancer, no COVID-19, not LGBTQIA and do not have sex, nor have been sexually active in years, and no longer have a menstrual cycle. I was a virgin when I went to college, and was at home praying on September 11th as well as election days (normally). I am now 55 years old. I have not gotten my paycheck in almost 60 weeks. I am obviously not pregnant. God is still Awesome! My Mammogram was negative again. No Cancer no COVID-19. I passed all of my courses required for my MD in addition to becoming a member of the American Bar Association. I was a 17 year old virgin when I went to FAMU. I have had years in between where I didn't mess around at all, like when my sons and I lived in Georgia, and afterwards during my second 40 day fast, when my ex husband went away into the military, during my pregnancy, every day of 2012 and most of 2013, and more time than not in between.
This women single handedly saved the lives of so many students! Really will miss this era of my life watching her videos. My exam is the day after tmrw and all I will say is, Thank you!
Many thanks The Law Teacher. But surely, decisions of R v Clouden and P v DPP are logically inconsistent. If force has no definition in law, and it's up to the jury, gabbed or slid, force is still needed. What about ''slight'... do we need a numerical value in newtons?(!) All very confused.
You’re absolutely right, they are logically inconsistent, and that’s one criticism that you can make of the law. This is the issue we have with case law decided by different judges!
Baron was COA, and Ivey was SC. Baron confirmed that the test for dishonesty in English criminal law is the test described by the Supreme Court in Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK). The test described in R v Ghosh (1982) does not apply [Barton paragraphs 1 and 105].
Imagine a large multinational corporation, XYZ Corp, which operates a chain of luxury hotels across several countries. One of their hotels, located in a bustling metropolis, employs hundreds of staff members ranging from cleaners and chefs to managers and concierges. The hotel is renowned for its impeccable service and luxurious amenities. One day, a guest at the hotel, Mr. Johar, slips on a wet floor near the pool area and sustains a serious injury to his spine, resulting in permanent paralysis. Investigation reveals that the floor was wet due to a leak from a faulty pipe, which the maintenance staff had neglected to fix despite being aware of the issue for several days. Mr. Johar decides to sue XYZ Corp, seeking substantial damages to cover his medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering. In addition to suing the corporation, Mr. Johar decides to sue XYZ Corp, seeking substantial damages to cover his medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering. In addition to suing the corporation, Mr. Johar also names the hotel manager and the head of maintenance as co-defendants, alleging them also contributed to his injury. Could anyone plz establish that xyz corporation is responsible or not for the act of manager act and head of maintenance
