u stupid? literally says his peak in the top right at 1765 in other words this was during his climb up to his current rating now at around 1900. Use some critical thinking please
i have no idea how a 2100 blundered that deadly attack. how were there no red flags going off when he wanted to take that pawn? im like 1200 and i saw that winning sequence before the queen moved.
@@nov3m472 I did check her profile, and she is just a really weak player. 1500 blitz, 1200 bullet etc, numbers anyone can get in a year even without good talent. Crazy these people are given titles
Can someone breakdown why the opponent resigned at 13:05? As far as i can see.. it would go black takes the white bishop on D5, pawn takes the black queen on D5. There is no mate in one threat now, the knight on D8 protects the H7 square.. This will maybe end in a draw but black has better pawns even if white still has a queen
Black has 2 knights against a Queen, which is simply not enough. There is Qxe5 check coming along with the queen gobbling up all the pawns and Black's king is still pretty unsafe. Its all and all winning for white
@@LeechLord2705 Ok but he has over 2 and a half minutes and has almost the same material value if not more.. for a 2000-2100 it should be no problem to bring it back
@@j15585 It is a problem getting it back. The point is: White has the initiative and has so much pressure. If you're a supercomputer, it wouldn't be much of a problem waiting for an eventual blunder and mistake you can capitalise on. Plus, it's really difficult getting Black's pieces on desired squares. You also have to take into account the mental pressure Black is playing in. He's down 2 minutes, will lose his queen, and can't think of an idea to get his pieces out.
Queen takes h8, B. Rook d7, Queen takes e5 Check, B. King a6... from there, it is hard to say for specific players styles, but becomes a matter of White managing to outmanuever and out trade blacks defensive pieces, as they are unable to recover from such a poor position (unless White blunders something that stretches the imagination)
I think ive genuinely found out how t1 wins his games. Because of how trash his opening is, he tends to be at a disavantage around move 10-15, wether it be by +/- 1 or 2. He's then forced to pressure his opponents for the rest of the game. Before when he was around 1200-1600 he'd do so for about 10-15 moves before blundering but now since he's done it so much he can sometimes literally do so for the rest of the game, which is what he does here. It's genuinely impressive how he's able to do this and how accurately he attacks (sometimes) which makes it all the more suprising how people can say he's boosted/wintrading.
@@solidago1041I mean Tyler been training 4-5 hours a day. His growth isn’t even unprecedented, I’ve seen a small RU-vidr named Jacksark climb to 2200 in just two years at 22 years old
