Which of my photographs is my favorite? Probably the one I am going to take tomorrow! ...................
Hello,
Welcome to adventure lovers to our channel! Join us as we captures the world's essence through photography. From stunning landscapes to vibrant cultures, immerse yourself in extraordinary destinations. Gain travel tips, hidden gems, and cultural insights. Let us ignite your wanderlust!
If you enjoy our content, we kindly invite you to join our community by hitting the like button, subscribing to our channel, and sharing our videos with fellow travel and photography enthusiasts. Don't forget to press the bell icon to stay updated on our latest adventures, ensuring you never miss a moment of inspiration.
Great video! I understand the confusion, Im as well. I use the 16-35mm F4 now, and want to upgrade. Im afraid that the strong distorion on 14-35mm will irritate me, but the 15-35 is quite big. The f2.8 is welcome though! Also looking into 10-20mm, but I actually like the 35mm range. So basically I have to get 10-20mm & 15-35mm... which is quite an expensive option!
@@AMPhotography Im also thinking about getting the 14-35mm for every day use, and the 11-24 EF for special ocations. For pro work its good that its so big ;-) Almos same money for these two lenses, as one 10-20mm, as the 11-24 used is getting cheaper now.
I know I am late, but this was a great video. You probably know this already.. but when balancing heavy external zoom lenses on gimbal, you want to set the zoom at the midway point of the zoom while balancing on the gimbal. That way you shouldn't have an issue when you zoom in either direction during gimbal use.
Thank you… 🙏 Well it depends on how much the lens extends and how powerful the motors of the gimbal are. If it is too long that technique doesn’t work. Specially on Canon cameras and wide angle lenses with IBIS on. Unless the gimbal is quite accurately balanced; those strange wobble on the corner gets more prominent.
Priceless documentation and photography. It really allures anybody to go there. Photography, description, history and sense of spiritual realisation for the theists is exceptional. I love these types of historical tourism.
Fantastic place and exploration. I have never seen such place. I knew the grand canyon of USA on colorodo river. This exceptional canyon is really beyond imagination. Thanks for a cinematic show of such a grandiose place.❤️❤️
The artworks photographed inside Ait Ben Haddou Palace: There are a number of international works of art that were used in the palace to film the events taking place inside it: - The Italian film “Sodom and Gomorrah” in 1962, directed by Robert Aldrich. - The Italian film “Oedipus Rex” in 1967, directed by Pier Paolo Pasolini. - The American film “The Man Who Would Be King” in 1975, directed by John Huston. - The Arabized English film “The Message” in 1976, directed by Mostafa Akkad. - The English film “Time Bandits” in 1981, directed by Terry Gilliam. - The Italian-English series “Marco Polo” in 1982. - The American film “The Jewel of the Nile”, 1985 AD, directed by Louis Tigue. - The Afghan film “The Living Daylights”, 1987, directed by John Glenn. - The American film “The Last Temptation of Christ”, 1988, directed by Martin Scorsese. - The American film “The Sheltering Sky” in 1990 AD. - The American film “Kundun” in 1997, directed by Martin Scorsese. - The American film “The Mummy” in 1999, directed by Stephen Sommers. - Gladiator movie, 2000 AD, directed by Ridley Scott. - The American film “Alexander” in 2004, directed by Oliver Stone. - The American film “Kingdom of Heaven” in 2005, directed by Ridley Scott. - The movie “Babel” in 2006, directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu. - The American film “One Night with the King” in 2006, directed by Michael O. Sajbel. - The film Son of God, 2014, directed by Christopher Spencer, Tony Mitchell, and Crispin Rees
@@AMPhotographyYour work is amazing. Bravo on this comparison. These two lenses are very close. In fact I would love to see the prints from these two to see if the minor differences could be noticed. Some clearly need the faster lens for their work but the quality of the F4 is so close and even beats the F2.8 in the middle range part of the field. Again the difference is small and maybe not enough to see in prints even at close distances. Again thank you for your work.
@@noctwice I am now regularly using the 14 35 on the mountains. I don’t see any difference. I think my ability to enjoy the hike and get there without breaking my back is more important that sone purest looking at 200% to find minor difference that doesn’t matter. Now I only carry the 15 35 where I need to do astro or I am going to other places than the mountain where I can walk on flat land or go by car. I can now 100% recommend 14 35 as an alternative of 15 35 for landscape photography.
Exquisite cinematography. The narration however could have been way better and versatile taking into account the pronunciations and eloquence of the speakers. Nevertheless, the serene and ethereal archipelago of the Lakshadweep Islands are always a sight for sore eyes.
Fantastic. The name ghost is somehow thrilling to almost everybody and to me it's a creepy felling although I don't believe in the concept of etheral existence. Beautiful photography as usual and an admirable commentry. ❤❤
Canon R5C, Canon R5 for all movies with RF 14 35 F4, RF 24 70 F2.8, RF 70 200 F4 and RF 100 500 F4.5 to 7.1. DJI Mini 3 Pro; which I finally crashes; full version video of Wadi Rum will reveal more. The night skies are with H-Alpha modified Nikon D850 and Nikon D810A. Most moving shots are using DJI Ronin S3 Pro gimbal and some using tripod. Car shots are with GoPro 11. And I also had a Insta 360 1 Inch with me; but none of those shots are in this short version. They will be used in the longer detailed versions.
Sehr schön! Fantastische Aufnahmen, richtig in Szene gesetzt mit der richtigen Musikuntermalung. Das Video verzaubert und macht Lust auf mehr. Bitte macht weiter so.
Thank you for passing by… 🙏 There are no package trip that will do something like this. It requires study, special planning and local bedouin guide. I have explained everything in my Egypt travel guide. Link below. Have a look. And the details of our guide Hamada is in the description of the guide. You can ask him to take you to the same places and he would arrange everything! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EmHdHiunk7g.htmlsi=kgaZuGq0IVwrj3hp
Thank you for this real world comparison which actually isn't done in the usual technical reviews. On first view there are a lot of points in favor of the 14-35 - weight, price, plus 1mm at the wide end, filter size. But there's a feature that isn't mentioned in your video but make the decision even more difficult for me: The 14-35 is heavily software corrected and dependend on the profiles in LR, DxO etc while the 15-35 is optically corrected and way better in this regard. If you are shooting exclusively in raw format like I do and switch off the correction (or have no appropriate profile in your Raw converter in C1 etc) you will realize a horrible barrel distortion that is very difficult to correct and also an extreme corner shading since the 14-35 effectively is wider than 14mm without the software correction. Gordon Lang has proved this in his review, too. BTW, JPEGs are corrected automatically in the camera which cannot be switched off from what I know. Of course, you can argue that the result is important in the end - not the way how it's achieved. But in my more than 35 years of serious nature photography optical performance and correction of my lenses had always priority. So it may be the new approach of the manufacturers to sacrifice native optical quality in favor of software correction in order to save costs and weight. But that's a route I'd really need to get used to and therefore I'm even more undecided. Optically, the 15-35 clearily is the much better lens though the practical points may favor the 14-35 Wolfgang, Germany
Thank you for passing by. Indeed; and the profile are bit different between different RAW convertors. I use Capture one and the way it manages the profile is a little bit difficult that Lightroom. But as you said to me the final result is more important than how it was achieved. And when the bag weighs 21 KGs and one needs to hike up 1000+ meters; those few grams make a huge difference. Being said that; I still didn’t manage to sell off the 2.8. It does have its place in the bag in times. Specially for video work. But in my current trip to Jordan; I brought in the 14 and would do the same in September Iceland. That 1 MM would make a difference. Unless I get the 10 22! 😀
