Plixer is the premier global Network Detection and Response (NDR) Cybersecurity platform. Offering total visibility across the entire network landscape, Plixer enables enterprises to discover and combat even the most sophisticated security threats with unprecedented speed and precision. With lightning-fast deployment and cutting-edge AI, Plixer's category-defining solutions empower enterprises to enhance their overall security posture, giving them tools to detect and respond to incidents in real time and minimizing their reputational and financial risks. Plixer was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Kennebunk, ME.
Scrutinizer is a sound product. Unfortunately, Plixer is forcing customers to upgrade to their "plixerone" solution, which consists of additional offerings they have attempted to sell individually with little success.
Cisco is better. I say this because Cisco will most likely have more appliances to further compliments each appliances capabilities and features. Yea it cost money. But good shit costs.
Hi there, nice Video. One question, I would like to delete all the IP Groups. I was able to do so on most of them except the "internal address". How can I do it?
you all probably dont care but does anyone know a method to get back into an Instagram account? I was stupid lost my account password. I would appreciate any tips you can give me!
@Adriel Bode i really appreciate your reply. I got to the site on google and Im trying it out atm. Looks like it's gonna take a while so I will get back to you later when my account password hopefully is recovered.
Anyconnect initiates the protected session over TCP 443. After session initiation, the VPN is completed as an IKEv2 IPsec tunnel using EAP authentication.
Cisco anyconnect can work on both protocol SSL/IPSEC. But initial connection has to be SSL ( to download XML profile ) if the end-point (laptop etc.) never connected to that particular VPN before and then you can make IPSEC as preferred protocol over SSL in ASA's config. Hope this help !
I dont know what youre talking about man. Are you comparing Cisco TAC when it comes to fireeye support vs PAN or simple firewall support? Because its not really a good comparison...
Being that you did this video in late 2016 you didnt mention the latest Cisco offering... UNFORTUNATELY, 9300 and 4100 as well as FMC, SNORT and FTD.... You need to do more work before you put together such an insufficient video.
Wouldn't it have been better to compare a firepower NGFW such as the Cisco 4100 series device to the equivalent PA? appreciate certain ASA functionality is lacking however that's being addressed and it's more inline with the direction Cisco is headed. If you thought Cisco enjoyed taking your money, PA takes it to the next level and beyond.
2100/4100/9300 refers to FTD appliances and with features lacking its not a true comparison at this time so what you are left with is PAN vs Cisco ASA "with" FirePOWER Services. FTD is Cisco's answer to PAN but its quite late in the game and there tech is fragmented. When will it be streamlined if ever is the question. Clustering was a major headache and those complaints were moved to the front of the line and is now supported, RAVPN is another big one for a lot of Enterprises out there. You also have companies who just invested millions of dollars worth of NextGen ASA's "with" FirePOWER Services only be told now FPS is going away and FTD is the new thing. Cisco thankfully is at least allowing a re-imaging of that invested hardware to FTD which is good for some but for those with 5585X's they are SOL as FTD will not run across the 85X's multiple CPU complexes. If I have 85X's then I will definitely need to upgrade to perhaps 2100/4100 hardware to implement FTD.
I don't think you went into the NGFW features enough. This was a firewall comparison and not a security comparison and doesn't actually tell me anything I couldn't read on a spec sheet
Agreed, came across this as I was watching some Sec vids...forget the Firewall piece, its irrelevant as every vendor does Firewalling...you start to get separation when you (as you mentioned) start focusing on the NextGen feature sets etc. DPI is standard stuff, nothing crazy there, URL Filtering is again standard stuff, Wildfire brings potential zero-day protections..the question is always "What do you want from your Edge device?"...If IDS/IPS is the main focus, you're going to have a hard timing beating Sourcefire/Firepower...if you want ease of management, onbox manageability versus need for management appliance, go PAN. These are the things I would have focused on. In short, Cisco = currently fragmented technology (being streamlined into FTD but its not at full feature parity to the ASA) while PAN is a great single pass architecture and extremely easy to manage (either onbox or centrally with Panorama). Cisco needs more time before it can truly compete with PAN in the Edge space, anxious to see what FTD becomes when its ready but being Cisco who knows...they remain behind the curve for now.
