NOT FULLY CORRECT: CONSCIOUSNESS is NOT part of the body or the whole beeing ... it is the only thing which is indestructible and untouchable and its function is OBSERVING, WISDOM and MEMORY ... mindfulness is a basic function of the consciousness ... its true nature is clear light and it is limitless... and outer light exists as well .... and consciousness IS NOT the mind (citta)
Ae bhai ek baat to batao - ye main Jaan Gaya k main am not this body ..there is some pure consciousness the real me ..but es se badlega kya ? Point kya hai life ka.fir ?.sab Maya prapanch hai to?.main kru kya fir ? Sab kuch meaning less hai ? Mera hone ka aur ye jaan lene ka kya sense hai 🤔
can you host a dwaitha pundit to know the views of dwaitha as well. and if possible a traditional Adwathi (not who have read the philosophy from english), to speak about "real" Advaitha
... Recently read abt an IAS Officer who is a rank holders in many exams. He is known for corruption free service. 👉 But, his communication skills are very poor. 👉 Reason why he frequently made clashes with govt authorities, colleagues & even with family members....!
Nobody doubts his or her existence that existence is known through knowledge ,interesting thing is you can't differentiate knowledge and existence...sat ...chit .
Thank You Sir 🙏🙏. I was going to ask you a follow up question but I think you have already asnwered it. Q. Is my counciousness different from yours ? - When I saw the light (Conciousness) reflected from your hand and shiny head - at the same time - I got my answer: - It is the same all prevading conciousness but manifested differently - it manifests differently in hand and head for example. That begs the question though. Can consiousness of itself make inanimate objects animate ? or does it need assitanse of aything else - Superconciousness Perhaps ?
Vandan hai jinhone iss lecture ko ham tkk pahunchane ka socha, last ke 10 min me voice hazy hone lagi thi. Please make these lectures accessible to all
The feeling of " I ", such as, "I am" or "I exist" are the proofs for consciousness. Naming consciousness as "Chaitanya" or "Chith" are mere words. When a baby is born, it has only natural urges like, hunger, sleep and excretion. Only after a couple of months, the baby begins to feel that itself is an entity, and someone (say, the mother) protects it. As the baby gets growing, it develops the consciousness such as, "I am" as the focal point and all other things as "things external to her / him". Therefore, it is clear that there was no consciousness at the time of a baby's birth (except for the natural urges). Consciousness develops as the child grows, in order that, only with consciousness, the brain begins to relate things. Without consciousness, the brain won't grow. At the early stage, the brain lets the consciousness to grow, and the brain itself depends on the consciousness to grow at later stage. So, mind and consciousness are the products of the brain and they won't exist without the brain. Examples can be quoted according to our convenience, like the clergy quoted "hand, light, sight". But, the word is not the thing.
Now I understand that what the shloka tells about jagatmithya There is only ONE CONSCIOUSNESS this is the ultimate truth and the CONSCIOUSNESS himself created nature and all that. From that CONSCIOUSNESS there is personal consciousness present in the body and the personal consciousness is incomplete conciousness.The aim of life is to be the complete the incomplete conciousness. CONSCIOUSNESS is brahma,atma,satya, ब्रह्म सत्वं जगन्मिथ्या जीवो ब्रह्मव नापरः।
42:07 A= you the waker and your entire waking experience (waking) U= you the dreamer and your dreams (dreaming) M= deep sleep/darkness Silence= the real consciousness. That silence is the silence underlying noise, not silence as opposed to noise. Pronounce it as Om not aum
