The rule was made so even if you miss the extra point the other team tries to get it out it’s not a safety because that would give you the ball wich isn’t allowed so that saftey acts as a extra point
That is amazing that it has only happened twice in NCAA history, and one of the announcers in the booth at this game was also at the other game where it happened!
So I’m confused I thought what had to happen was that the kick is blocked, returned for like 80 yards to the opposing teams end zone, than is fumbled recovered by the kicking team and then they’re tackled in there own end zone.
In the NFL, I believe that’s how it used to be, but the NFL changed its rules in 2015 to mirror the college rules that any team returning a blocked kick now is “the offense”. So now it may happen in the NFL (it almost did in a Buffalo/New England game).
The play at 3:38 was just crazy. It's too bad he stepped out of bounds but even doing so, he made those 5 Auburn players look like middle school players in the end zone.
I remember saying this right as it happened to my family. I was like...uh, Oregon gets the point for that since KSU inexplicably took the ball back into their own endzone.
I come back to this video sometimes, I've been watching it since it came out. It's hard to understand how much things have changed and how much they've, paradoxically, stayed the same. I'll keep chasing this elusive high that is the one point safety. I'm like a dog chasing a car, I wouldn't know what to do with it if I caught it.
To make it even worse, the guy who recovered the kick threw a forward lateral, which would have also resulted in a safety even if they got it back out of the endzone.
So they tried to kick the extra point but it got blocked so they didn’t get the extra point but they got a 1 point safety which basically was the same as making the extra point
I'm confused, at the end of the video you see the Oregon kicker, but if it was a safety, shouldn't Oregon get the ball back? Usually the team that gets the points after a safety gets the ball back
So lets say a team scores a TD and gets ahead 6-0 and is then going for 2 and the ball ends up rolling backwards and goes into THAT endzone and is recovered by the team going for 2....would the score then be 6-1?
Imagine a team doing the opposite and get a safety on the kicking team thus allowing them to have a score of 6-1. If you bet a dollar on a 6-1 final score football game the payout I have heard is around a billion dollars. I also heard Vegas won't make that bet on the offset it actually does happen but I think that's all rumors
Well imho Safety should be 2 no matter what (although I guess on converts it's different, but hell imho it should just 2 point converts no kicks and if the other side gets the ball and returns it to the other endzone, TD and a Amazing Play to be!). Yet in this game, means nothing as Oregon is going to win and likley does.
@@Namath1000 he’s referencing the Jon Bois scorigami video where you have a defensive 1 point safety where the team runs it all the way back, but they fumble, then the other team gets the ball and the safety happens 100 yards in the other direction
I think the ruling here should have been slightly different. On the attempted lateral by the Kansas State player who caught the blocked kick, it looks like he passed the ball forwards, not backwards. That should have been a penalty for an illegal forward pass. Since the penalty occurred in the end zone it still would have been a safety though.
Would it be a 1 point safety for the other team if the defense blocked the kick and returned it down the field but right before they got it into the endzone the kicking team stripped the ball and recovered the ball but then was tackled in the end zone by the non kicking team? If so that's the only way a team could potentially end a game with the score of just 1 point for them.