Yes, they sat as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. Sadly, perhaps, most commonwealth countries have chosen to establish their own Final Courts of Appeal and no longer send cases to the Privy Council. Instead, a member of the Supreme Court of England and Wales is invited to sit on the bench in important cases in, for example, NZ, Oz or HK. From memory, it's only the small Commonwealth countries who still retain appeal to the PC, eg Jamaica.
11:32 min ... 17:34 min ... 45:36 min ... 46:18 min ... 47:27 min ... "Belmarsh decision" 48:30 min ... "Severity of the house arrest ... most severe order the government had made was 18 hours inside your house ..." 50:19 min ... "by a majority of three to two, we say 18 hours is too much."
"Beating children" v "Hunting with dogs": **National** Society Prevention Cruelty to Children v **Royal** Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Children
@@JupiterThunder No doubt you are a yank. UK does not link political beliefs to our Judges - our Judges are politically un-biased - do your homework and stop posting tripe. In the USA - the rulings of judges have little regard because they have already allied themselves to one of the two parties. It is truly a flawed judicial system. Cast your eye across the pond America - and learn how to do it properly.
@@JupiterThunder An indigenous Brit? That sounds painful, I am sure you can get a cream for that. Recent Supreme Court judgement in the proroging of Parliament, in the country, demonstrates the independence of the judiciary. The Supreme Court is made up of the highest intellectually qualified lawyers: they succeed as barristers, become QCs and then work their way through the court system to arrive at the Supreme Court. They do not get there by pulling votes from punters. They are appointed by virtue of their excellence as barristers and lawyers. Lord Justice Hale came to the supreme Court by way of academia. Please tell us what the structural change Tony Blair introduced to render the justice system in adequate? In point of fact I’ve just bought Tony Blair‘s biography. I consider him to be one of the greatest prime minister’s this country has ever had.
@@JupiterThunder Utter rubbish. The UK judiciary is free of political bias. They are chosen for their intellectual progress and understanding, judgement, and learning of the law. No politics here at all. Blairite what a joke
I wonder why then that Julian Lasange is still in jail after many years of house arrest and his case is still not heard , is this a slow killing of an American perceived enemy !
Well the house arrest was self-imposed. You couldn't say that a introverted recluse convicted of a crime needn't serve a prison term because they spent the previous 10 years sitting at home. Regardless of his guilt or innocence
why don't you all start at making it compulsory for all persons involved in court cases to show identity proof as on the 9th march 2018 an imposter posed as the head of the UK Government's Head of Legal Department,&he's yet to be charged!
You're a lying cunt, as a supreme court justice or any judge for that matter can issue orders on legal matters that have never been presented in court. She did however publicly make comments regarding women and how they are treated in the U.K courts. It is well known that crimes committed by women are often downgraded or changed by the courts, as women are almost always likely to be mothers of children and the sole caregiver, it is not in the nature of a court to send sole caregivers to jail. Unless the judge decides it. Otherwise it will likely cause the destruction of the family life, creating more legal issues like rehousing for the children/dependencies etc. Also in cases involving custody of children , women are more likely to be given charge over men. Please stop spreading misinformation online, you only expose yourself as a liar.
I find the idea that Americans see their SC justices in terms of Republican/Democrat to be bewildering. I've no idea about the politics of our law lords, if indeed they have any. Surely they strive to be as neutral and as objective as possible?
Just a matter of time. I believe you now have a much stronger public identification of judges as Remain or Leave than even as party affiliated ... after the "Prorogation Decision"? Next stop - very public review of appointments ... I'd say very soon.
@@majesticprimate 3 years later and it hasn't happened. The British judges even stopped the government progaging (suspending) parliament and ruled their actions "unlawfull". Our judges remain unbiased and above politics, their political feelings remain their own. On the other hand currently in the USA judges are making rulings that have no legal standing and are purely political in nature. Justice Clarence Thomas is even able to make rulings on cases which have deep implications for his wife.
Cry all you want and demand all the bullshit you are asking for (Gary Solis can kiss my ass!) but when you are the one being shot at you would allow anything to have a good contractor there to protect your sorry ass. Fuck you all
I liked the international angle that Mr. Schwarz concluded about our own Federal Reserve and systemic risk. I was concerned that he thought banks have the power to allow less people to own homes. I also liked the rest of the panel. This included that systemic crises arise from sources other than banks alone. Insurance contracts on a bond also share worries.
Justice under siege in UK ;BHC/BET/RCJ in London are not impartial from top till the tail; They must be protected from the top seat in the court (please call me on fsh55555@yahoo.co.uk
Can NHS/GMC take actions against doctors who suffered PTSD as a result in victimization ? Can any firm consider the doctor as impaired without treatment if him? Who can anyone or Firms justify dismissal for financial problems;who dare to say it is cheaper to replace Doctors with new one leaving victims without any compensation which match the damages(loss career;loss health & loss income-6 years to be retired)?😭I am going to HR soon
Jesus prophesy about current courts & it’s corrupted Judges employed by corrupted system who are the owners of the GOLD;Masons put their signs on the dollars (After they remember the L) “In GOD WE TRUST” Satanic law is The Masons who are Ready to mischief the Humanity throughout the Money see how Justice is sold to only the richest irrespective to their crimes (assure you GB will drop down or alternative will replace it)Islamic is the one;that is why Satanic new world order are calling Muslim a terrorist!
That Baroness must, then, be from Richmond in North Yorkshire. It`s within pissing distance of my front door - and is, as she says, a rather attractive place.
ZIONIST STRATEGY STARTING IN 1900. GAIN CONTROL OF THE GOVERNMENTAL LEGAL SYSTEMS & WE CAN GAIN THE WORLD FOR THE CHOSEN PEOPLE. Here are two well known "legal geniuses" that had long but secret careers in the service of sinister land atealing & murdering Zionism - Louis Brandeis & Felix Frankfurter. Scintillating researcher & writer, Alison Weir, will blow your mind with her powerful expose of the sinister secret Zionist legal cabal - The PARUSHIM. www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/history.html
Where are the fighting lawyerfish, holy courtrooms, & Holy Law for the massacred, maimed, murdered, bleeding, hungry, & cold Palestinians in the Israeli enforced GAZA CONCENTRATION CAMP? I observe armored Israeli Caterpillar bulldozers ILLEGALLY demolishing Palestinian homes & olive trees. WHERE ARE THE HOLY LAWYERFISH WITH THE HOLY LAW? ZIONIST ISRAEL HAS MORE LAWYERS PER CAPITA THAN ANYWHERE ON EARTH.
I doubt you have viewed, or at best understood the video. I would suggest you read up how to use ampersands (& marks) but frankly, you haven't even grasped capital letters yet so there's no point really.
PERHAPS IF PEOPLE TOOK MORE TIME TO SEE IF THINGS AE UP TO DATE AND THAT THINGS ARE RUN MORE EFFECYIVELY IF ALL WHO ARE APPOINTED TAKE THERE JOB SERCIOUSLEY A REVIEW ALL BASES COVERED. ITS NOT WOMEN ITS NOT AWARE OH WELL ATTITUDE........
I surfed into this page because the media reported that David Laufman was the Justice Department official who interrogated Hillary Clinton. It would be interesting to know what role he had in all of the immunity that was handed out to Clinton and her assistants. Listening to this panel talk, I could not help to but wonder why none of these legal scholars expressed any desire to bring charges against any of the CIA or other officials who tortured the detainees on Guantanamo. If torturing prisoners is not a crime, what is point to belaboring all the ethical issues about detention and trial?
Why does that English chick keep sticking her tongue out? Is she tasting the air or something? I'd still probably prefer her over jus Ginsburg. Even if she has trouble keeping her dentures in her mouth.
+kelty lillquist Are you always this shallow, so personally disrespectful. Why don't you post a video of you speaking? I'm sure folk of a similar disposition will draw attention to something in you which might be the subject of low criticism.
get over it. we don't like hale, she's a horrid person, and a corrupted bureaucrat. people are disgusted by these 'intellectual' types, they have never really had to work in their lives - that's why people voted brexit and trumph! the law is not accessible. If i tell you "direct me to all law on murder", you wouldn't be able to. and it's because people like her r not doing their jobs properly.
Her contribution to the law has been... yes, just that. Nothing.The law is inaccessible and it's because of these bureaucrats. The law is still inaccessible, and it's because people like her, in these positions, do not work. They don't represent the views of decent people, and they do not work for them.
George Rothschild She’s simply a Supreme Court justice with no political affiliation. She can’t make any new laws. She can’t change things significantly that aren’t appealed. Hale is brilliant, she’s lived a normal life compared to other UK Justices - she went to a state school, got a scholarship to pay for her tuition, etc. - she’s just a normal person who only is able to interpret laws which are appealed (case appeals).
Hearing all this fuedal crap like :"baroness", "lords", "my lady" etc I can fully see why the USA decided to become a republic!! Lets hope Canada and Australia follow the US's great example.
+Stephen Tymcio Titles may be an archaic relic but they are our history and no longer symbolise what they once did in terms of repressive democracy. And what I think Arrun Harker meant; my guess is that he also finds it incredibly distasteful when the average American attempts to prop up their democracy as the 'bee's knees' when in reality, their representatives are the most deluded individuals that effectively bought their seats.
The US is an elective Monarchy, only they are sneaky about it. All this nonsense about a "Republic" is meaningless: the US President is infinitely more despotic and open to corrupt SUPERPAC abuse, vested interests (or at least has the potential to be) than any Constitutional Monarchy, anywhere.
+Nick Humphrey Why? It seems like Justice Ginsburg is confused as to how there could be a court where judges aren't able to write the law. Small wonder
