there are many mistakes in the terms and expressions. e.g. alpha= a(T-Tc) is wrong

The switching of the fermion operator from Heisenberg rep to interaction rep is a bit confusing around 28:30. I assume the c_lambda(t) on the two sides are in different reps, but it's not clear to me that at which time they are identical

Thanks a lot

I got here because I saw this on some dd study channel .

hello I want to follow course and get a certificate, what procedures?

thank you sir

Is there any video for Hubbard model explanation?

I’m 6 minutes in, and I loved how you emphasised the shape and how it’s possible to create true 2D statistically. Trea mind blowing stuff. 🇦🇺🤜🏼🤛🏼😎🍀

sir does the hall co efficient defined by hall voltage per unit magnetic filled per unit current ??? Then R_h should be 1/ne !!!

thankyou for explaining sir.

Thank you so much sir

Very educative.thanks sir

Rashba is no Japanese, but Russian scientist!

Which book should we follow along with the lectures

@ 10.18 min , it is being said here G^A is the advanced green function. but in the earlier video it was called advanced propagator. please clarify it. I think earlier one is correct. Thanking you.

Is this Dyson's disorder related to Anderson's disorder?

24:00 Relationship between propagator and Greens function

32:54 The Propagator (in brief)

18:56 This is why you cant solve the 3 particle problem? Because you can't write a Hamiltoniam H3 which was possible for H2 (equation 3).

33:01 Yes !!

Thank you so much sir

very nice lecture thanks

thanks a lot. what is the meaning of the assumption that the current density equal to degeneracy times integer? and what happen if B and n does to the assumption in 55:03?

This kind of helped me for my state of matter presentation (this was a really hard to understand due to my age and grade that im currently in)

Please provide definitions for these terms it will be usefull

Thank you sir

sorry! the quantization is still not explained. probably it's better to introduce the edge states while explaining this part.

beautifully explained

Thanks for your explanation, it is realy nice and good for expanation of wicks theorem and feynman diagrams.

Interesting Lectures::

THANK YOU FOR POSTING GVERY GOOD VIDEO!

Most of the expression are wrong..not actually wrong there are some mistakes in calculation..

Lecture, starts with brief overview of the course. Then, after briefly discussing single and many particle non interacting wave function and Hamiltonian. It proceed to build up the concept of propagators starting with T.D.S.E.

In BEC when N<Ne(no. Of particles in excited states), then particles are distributed only in excited states or in both ground and excited states?

Bose-Einstein Condensate: science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/269/5221/198.full.pdf

When sgnk = -1, how could P =1 ?

Rather ...rather ..rather..rather...infinity

your email please

Yo

Sir, for two particle case you have written the wave function not the Hamiltonian.... It should be corrected.

Thank you

Sir plz video made in hindi

Thanks!!!

Sir, could you please upload a video for the valley Hall effect also???

Very nice 👍

First LEARN to teach!!! Having knowledge does NOT mean you can transfer this knowledge to other people. And you can't :-(

For propagators start here: @ 22:59

Why isn't the concept of "exchange energy" introduced? It's more a math-course than a physics-course, in my opinion.

How are we getting 4 in the dinominator?

excellent but after writing them i have to revise them. a bit dis-organised.