I have not seen or heard that anywhere. In fact, i’ve seen other teams in other states bowl with one in their intake without any consequence. Thanks for the heads up!

check qna 1778, they explicitly say sg6 does not reference possession

I’ve been told this by the men, the myths, the legends, John Queen and Cowboy Chris, two very well known head referees at worlds

@@19291AFrom the QNA, “This addition is not intended to prohibit non-Possession introductions of multiple Match Loads, such as while the Robot is Possessing a Triball from a non-Match-Load maneuver. Legal example: Robot has control of a Triball in their intake and drives over to a Match Load Zone; their Match Load mechanism is a rapid-fire catapult, so each Match Load is only placed on the Robot momentarily, i.e., not controlled / Possessed (legal example) Legal example: Match Loads being introduced onto a ramp (one at a time), such that they pile up in front of the Robot and meet the definition of Plowing, not Possession”

@@Carter355Z the second example never specified if this was the case with a triball in the intake. It just said you can bowl

Bro the trend starting in Illinois now after Carter took my line smh

Jokes aside- nice work, keep grinding!

Thanks!

Fr

Not bad

@@benhuggins0816 ours were terrible I had to change them when I got there and they only barely worked

RIP

facts