Can you track where nozzle is in 3d space and save coordinates to a list? I know you cannot read current position but you could keep track of the relative moments from starting position or home. Would be nice way to measure/probing objects in 3d space
could you in theory hook up a Wacom drawing tablet to a 3d printer so as the xy coordinates are controlled by the hovering stylus location, extrusion was controlled by actually pressing the stylus against the tablet, and z was controlled via being raised by a layer every time you lift back off of the tablet? I know this is dumb and would be a mess but I can't stop thinking about it.
I'm a biomedical engineering student...now I'm pursuing final year. I'm going to take seminar on this topic. It's very interesting one💯 Thank you for your clear explanation 👍
Hey, urgent quick question. Does the distance the XYZ motors can travel the same as the print size, or can it travel wider when controlled on Python? Thinking of buying a second hand printer for a gantry robot. Appreciate your reply, thanks!
What do you mean? You’re already contributing to the acceleration process, you wrote that comment with a machine and an internet connection, which are both pieces of technological capital. Capital you agreed to contributed to because it improved your standard of living.
What? People making an argument that adds to their own power and wealth at the expense of humanity in general? Gosh, how original. On the other hand, just saying that running over irritating things like regulations is good because growth is natural is actually dumb as hell, given that nature actually hates that and whatever organism upsets balances is in the end destroyed. So regulations that, for example, should prevent a rocket company from blasting debris into your front yard and taking away access to your beach, as is actually happening (Hi, Elon) or do real damage, like letting an AI crash important systems that support people . . .is not a philosophy. It's just excusing antisocial behavior. Plato, for example, based his philosophy on a a small set of observations about reality, like, a lot of it seems illusory and absolutes seem necessary but not to exist in reality--but even thinking in a very structured way, Plato got a whole lot of stuff wrong partly because his assumptions were so wrong, and ended up more or less creating a roadmap for fascist cult in his Republic. These clowns in e/acc can't hold a candle to Plato, so you can expect something much worse to develop from their really dumb arguments, if they were to actually get the powers they wish to have. Their fundamental view is that the rest of humanity is expendable so long as they can develop their technologies. Aristotle had this thing called Telos, a great idea, and would suggest that the ends these idiots have in mind are really, really, bad and their thinking is a warped pretense to Virtue.
I like your video. 👍 My take on both e/acc and e/alt is they're both too generalistic. They both seemingly paint broad ills in society as being a result of certain conceptual root causes that can be solved by taking opposite although equally generalistic approaches, and this just seems to me like a false dichotomy. Before deciding whether e/acc or e/alt is good, maybe we should decide if more or less regulation is good conceptually? Even that sentence paints a false dichotomy; there are some circumstances where we might be better off with more regulation, and some circumstances where we'd be better off with less.
Yup. It's a shallow self-serving philosophical framework used to justify hyper-capitalism which, just coincidentally, of course /s, benefits them personally.
Government regulation is inherently worse than market mechanics at any job, as economic centralization is inherently worse at allocating means efficiently, it is 'groping in the dark.' Effective accelerationism is like trying to launch a rocket from a launch pad which is on fire while refusing to talk about WHY its on fire. It is not complete, it is just a type of Anarcho-Capitalism. Remember, "Nothing human makes it out of the near-future."
It's imperative that we create open source AI models that can be embodied in removable storage. Whoever achieves this endeavor first will be written in history books. Now is the time of the AI revolution. Act now! We won't get a second chance at this.
The question becomes not on making returns from stock-ownership, but rather than on the contradiction between rises in corporate-profits in the company of stagnant gross domestic-product.
Wow! Amazing video. I was able to easily understand the information because of the manner you compiled it. Hopefully this will help me on my upcoming test!
hey please mention all the libraries u used and we have to install thanks for the project again and please also mention your other ways to contact like social media and stuff :)
e/acc fanatics haven't touched grass outside their tech bubble. Most of the work that AI can perform will end up destabilizing the wealth classes even more. We'll have more people in poverty and our government won't be able to keep up with solutions. In the end, the government will heavily regulate AI if it doesn't benefit the system. Once again, techies are so out of touch with their own humanity and end up recurring to their coping mechanisms
