The City of Allen, Texas maintains this channel to provide information and promote City of Allen programs, services, policies and objectives. It is the City’s goal to keep the most current and accurate information available to the public on this site, however, varying events can occur that could affect the timeliness of the information and the accuracy of the content. Comments posted on this site by will be monitored, please view our Social Media Policy by going to www.CityofAllen.org/SocialPolicy.
This site/page may contain links to other Internet sites and resources as a convenience to the viewer. Linked sites/pages are not under the control of, nor maintained by, the City of Allen and the City is not responsible for the content of these sites. In addition, the inclusion of a linked site/page does not constitute an endorsement or promotion by the City of Allen, Texas.
My biggest problem with all those theories is: they are all too complicated Let’s just assume JFK has mightily enemies (in and outside the government) and they wanted him gone. Why not produce a huge scandal concerning his „womanizing“ or just slip him some pills. Some people knew how sick he was. We are talking about the early 60ies, prostitutes, security implications, a catholic and so on…. and he covered up his real health problems. So, why so complicated?
Steven paddock did not kill those people in Las Vegas. It was a team black helicoptered into the area floating in between the hotels. There are massive amounts of evidence, video, eye witness, and audio combined with radar of aircraft showing the blips in real time. Stop the cap
This is an excellent presentation of how the shooting could have been plotted. There has been a lot of research put into this speech. There are some trolls here in the comments section that are spewing nonsense, they should be ignored. This presentation MAKES SENSE. Brian Edwards is a very credible researcher.
I loved your talk, I am a decedent of native Americans in what is today Texas. I would like to critique a few things, I know everyone was short on time and it was an overall great talk. You spent a lot of time focusing on the Spanish and I understand they had the longest interaction with the Karankawa but I feel like you spent a lot of time of time taking about the Spanish and not enough time taking about the Anglo settlers that actually succeeded in genocide. It should be noted, the Spanish did not want to destroy the Karankawa, they wanted to destroy the rebel bands that refused to submit. It may seem the same but it’s not. Also Jose Maria was NOT arrested because he “killed a cow without permission” he was arrested because he killed someone else’s cow (these cows were owned by Native American residents). You can look up surviving records of Mission Refugio, these cows and such had owners, many were natives living in the missions. That’s law, he was raised in the Mission system, he fully understood western laws and he chose to break those laws and then start a rebellion. Also Father Galica was upset at the Karankawa because they requested a mission only to abuse it. It’s was a smear campaign of propaganda, it was an honest report to the superiors of missions. You realize the supplies that went to these Karankawa who were being dishonest came from other missions and residents? His frustration was justified in my opinion. Lastly, you entirely avoided how the Mexican government led the same level of persecution and extermination as the Anglo settlers. The Spanish did want to erase the Karankawa culture but not the people, they wanted them to become Spanish, and many did and honestly had it mot been for the Spanish missions we would know nothing of the Karankawa. In fact the last Spanish missionary, Father Antonio Diaz, relentlessly defended the rights of The Karankawa, coco and arminas. He was later killed by Anglo settlers in east Texas and he was certainly not the only priest who defended the rights of the Karankawas.
Oswald practiced, practiced, practiced. It wasn’t only in Dallas that there wasn’t the strict protocol the Secret Service has today. Anyone could have walked up to the motorcade and shot JFK. Truman used to go for walks in DC at one time. This was a breakdown in protection. Regardless if it was a cheap rifle or a match rifle, it was an easy shot with a scoped rifle.
I don't believe it was the American government or the CIA who killed John F. Kennedy, and I believe poor Lee Harvey Oswald was indeed a patsy. It was most likely the Israeli Mossad who shot the president. The Israelis wanted nuclear energy, which John Kennedy refused to let them have. He knew that this would give Israel the means to make a nuclear bomb, which Kennedy was absolutely against. After the President's assassination, Lyndon Johnson (who happened to be Jewish), became the new President, and by 1967 Israel had produced its first two nuclear bombs. Estimates today suggest that Israel now has between 80 to 400 nuclear warheads.
How could these guys be so wrong about the possibility of one of the shots coming from the storm drain? Researchers have gone down there and timed themselves walking back out. That's a weird thing for these guys to be misinformed about. I think it's around the 4:28:00 mark where they get into it. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-G0XNiu-yutk.htmlfeature=shared
If Kennedy's brain went missing from the national archives, as we've all been informed, how did it get there in the first place? Because staff at Bethesda such as Paul Occonor have stated repeatedly that the brain was already gone by the time Kennedy's body arrived there in a bodybag. So, would there be a record of who brought the brain to the archives? Because if this person is still alive, I'd love to ask them where they found Kennedy's brain.
The "Umbrella Man" was (allegedly) Roy Hargraves. He was PUMPING the umbrella up and down to get William Greer's attention. The "Cuban/Radio Man" was.(allegedly) Felipe Vidal Santiago. He stepped off the curb and into the road with his arm raised high above his head with a closed fist for Greer to STOP. This is a (universal military stop signal). Greer then came to a rolling stop. Two shots were fired into the head of JFK. “Task Successful”. Greer then accelerated quickly. Both men sat down off the side of the curb for a moment until the situation was “all clear”. They both stood up at the same time and left the scene in opposite directions. Never to be seen again.
Why did they feel they needed to plant a palm print on the gun to frame Oswald after he had already been killed by Jack Ruby. If the intention was to paint Oswald as the lone gunman, why was it necessary to risk planting a palm print on the weapon? Isn't it better to fail to find a usable print on the gun rather than to risk being seen by the coroner getting prints from a corpse in the early morning hours? His explanation about the photo of Oswald being fake doesn't make any sense. Roscoe White is accused of being the actual shooter, and apparently worked as a photographic expert. But he certainly wasn't removed from a photo and replaced with a picture of Oswald. Our presenter thinks the actual shooter, in his job as a photographic expert, removed himself from a photograph and inserted Oswald in his place. What a coincidence that he would need Oswald to stand in his place yet again. After the presenter accuses White of 1. being the real shooter, and 2. faking a photo of Oswald by using a photo of his own body(bizarrely), 3. he mentions Roscoe White is also the one who shot officer Tippet, but never explains this. As an aside - it's not really clear why Tippet would have been shot by anybody at all unless a lookalike shot him in order to frame Oswald. Roscoe White was not an Oswald lookalike, so why would he be guilty of this murder?
I was 5 years old.And I live on a military base I watched the moon again and I saw John Kennedy. Gets saw the petal shot that hitting in the front. It's running backwards. I'll never forget.
I said that wrong. I was 5 years old.I lived on a military base in californi.Just got out Kenny garden. To go home to watch the motorcade on TV I saw John Kennedy get shot on TV. I saw the Fatal shot. Then hit the President in my head. It came from the Front. It threw him backwards when he was hit.
For the people who believe the government about what happened. Which government do we believe? The one that created the Warren Report or the government that said President John F. Kennedy "was probably assassinated as the result of a conspiracy." 😂
The man is correct about so much. And there was certainly was military knowledge. Bombs away LeMay was celebrating , that ahoole. But (most of the) tshooters were LBJ buddies who had mob connections
Oswald probably fired the first two shots. The first shot hit the pavement according to eye witnesses. The second shot hit Kennedys lower neck area and also hit Connelly. The third shot came from a member of the security team. The third shot was accidentally fired when the Kennedy car and the the security detail car accelerated to leave the scene. The third shot hit Kennedys head blowing a portion of his skull off of Kennedys head. The third shot was accidentally fired that killed Kennedy. The third shot was accidentally fired when the cars accelerated to leave the scene. There was no grassy knoll shooter. There was no conspiracy of individuals to assinate Kennedy. Hoover told the Warren commission what to write into the report. There were three empty shell casings on the floor. One shell casing was in the chamber and was ejected then two shots were fired from Oswald window in the Book storage . Again the third shot was accidentally fired.
Mexicans were not suspects in the 60s bc MEXICANS DID NOT HATE US DUMBASS!! RUSSIA HATES US WANTED US TO DIE SO YES THEY DESERVED TO HE SUSPECTED BACK THEN. COME ON... THINK A BIT
It doesn't seem like Oswald knew he was a dead man because if he did, he'd have nothing to lose and could name names instead of a general notion that he's a patsy. Following my logic, how could he not have known he was a dead man?
