I was playing with the brakes on landing trying to make it stop as fast a possible. It's not easy with widely spaced main gear. I can land it smoothly, if I'm trying to do that...
There's a difference between aggressive flying and ridiculous flying. Flying at 100 feet is low flying. Throwing the jet around of more aggressive flying.
I have not played DCS just because of this issue, I just upgrade it once in awhile. Pretty said. Never buy early release anymore if this is how they behave. Phantom 4 is one of my favorite aircraft but i won't buy it until F-14 is fixed.
i totally agree , they need to fix this before I buy anymore DCS stuff, this is customer abuse. They been totally irresponsible, 2 years or more later this is still broken. We as DCS community have been weak about holding them accountable.
Major Batman Pussy (Your condom smells so awful)of the FA-18 has made a frictional movie about a dogfight with an FA-18 and a Pakistani JF-17 Thunder. The service ceiling and cost of top current Western fighters are mentioned below. F-22 Raptor 50,000 feet and 230-400 million each. twin engine speed M2.0 FA-18 Hornet, 50,000 feet speed M1.8, twin engine. @70 million $ each. Eurofighter Typhoon 55,000 feet cost 124 millio0n $ each. speed M1.8 twin engine Dassault Rafale, 50,000 feet cost of each 236 million $ speed M1.8. Twin engine. Euro 7.87 billion for 36 aircraft to the Indian Air Force. Sab 39 Gripen, 50,000 @30 million each. speed Mach 2. twin engine F14 Tomcat, 50,000 feet cost equivelent cost in 2023 70 million $. Speed mentioned is 2.3 but these are doctored figures as the top US fighter speed F-15 is mentioned as M2.8 while actual pilot reports show a maximum of M2.3 or M2.4. So that is why the F-14 Tomcat is probably close to M2. Twin engine aircraft. The single engine JF-17 Thunder block 3 with a Russian RD93MA with 93 Kgf thrust engine has the heighest service ceiling of 58,000 feet, some 8000 feet higher than the top 400 million $ each F-22 Raptor. That is because that has a power to weight ratio of greater than 1+. With a single engine the aircraft is much lighter than the counterparts, burns and carries less fuel and also has a better combat radius. The top speef is M1.9 Going slightly of track I recall an early 2005's top gear BBC car programme in which THE STIG records the fastest lap times. There were cars like the latest Lamborghinis, Maseratis, Ferraris, Bugatti’s, Corvette Stingrays, very fast cars with engines ranging from 4000cc to 6000+cc for the corvetts and 8000+ cc for the Bugatti’s. Well the fastest lap time went to a 1300cc car, the Aerial Atom powered by a Kawasaki Hayabusa motorcycle engine. The point was all about power is to weight. And that is where the light, nimble agile JF17 Thunder outperforms all these elephant type twin engine aircraft that are heavy and impotent and have much lower service ceilings. The only real advantage of s twin jet is stronger radar but with modern technology had narrowed that gap considersbly. Now I would like to point to the cunning guile of the Wikipedia that equates the Thunder block 1, block 2 and block 3 as all one and the same. This is all rubbish. Yes the block 1 and 2 had many similarities but the block 3 is significantly different. The block 3 has many lighter composite materials and thus is 19.4% lighter, the empty weight for the block 2 being 7965kgs and the empty weight for the block 3 being 6411 kgs. The Russian RD93 engine has a 84.4 kgf thrust engine with afterburners while the new improved RD93MA engine has a 93 kgf afterburning engine making that 11% more powerful. While 19.4% less weight would mean a much higher ceiling of 58000 feet and not 55,000 feet as the block 2 frequently mentioned by Wikipedia and the extra thrust 11% with a reduced weight of 19.4% would give the block 3 a top speed of Mach 1.9 and not Mach 1.6 as deceitfully mentioned in Wikipedia which is the top speed of a block 2 and not that of a block 3. The pinyin air to air missile on a JF17 has a 300 km beyond visual range, while work is being carried on to increase the bvr to 400 km. The US- AM RAM and the French Matra missiles both have a BVR of 150 km giving the JF-17 a clear advantage. All the JF-17 Thunder flying at 58,000 feet has to do is drop some cow manure over the lower Flying FA-18 at 50000 feet so that the bald major Batman Pussy's condom stops stinking so badly and hopefully doesn’t explode. USAF fagot pilots are known not to trust American condoms and secretly and unpatriotically use Russian condoms
The MIG 41 or Su 35 May be able to shoot Raptor down but electronically speaking the Raptor is far ahead of them both. Raptor has second to none AESA radar at this Time and also stealth.
Definitely like your approach to landings you're spot on. Your strafing runs questionable it appeared you were extremely low? But I'm not comfortable a low altitude. Good video
No air craft compny but Pakistan air force prepares its air crafts by itself according to its needs and own desire.this is the one and only air force in the world that preparing its own air crafts by itself.
Elegance !!! 💕💕✊🇵🇰 Laughable to see Indians judging capacities of JF17 because of Chinese assistance ........... Chinese used even more backward weapons during 1962 war didn't you Indian lost ??? Weapons are weapons and Chinese weapons are gonna kill you (at least the Indians for sure) 😅
Well, the Obama Administration cancelled the F22 program and the USAF is supposed to mothball the remaining ones in 2030. There is a new fighter program that's in the works and we are building the F-15EX which has huge improvements.
RAPTOR isn't going anywhere yet ive herd, upgrades on going till 2031, so RAPTOR will be around into 2040s when something is available to take its place, to be perfectly honest if they retire the RAPTOR atoll, i think thats a stupid idea 100%, Formidable Fantastic Awesome Lethal Beast. 💪💪🔥🔥
Translation from Thai: Can you send me information about the bomb on the machine how strong the explosion will be, the size of the area, sometimes I will have to drop it.
de havilland aircraft company this aircraft have various duties figjter,bomber reconphotografy, carrie 4-20 mm and 4-0.50 heavy machine guns. two engines and two crew members. pilot and navigator.
I’ve had DCS World for a few years now but I was able to actually operate the TF-51d for the first time last year. I brushed it off for some reason and bought some of the Flaming Cliffs modules such as the F-15, the Su-27 and the Su-33. I wish I had discovered how cool the Tf-51 is earlier because when I finally did get a chance to fly it I was blown away by the full fidelity; it was really the first plane that had a clickable cockpit. But I realized that a regular mouse and keyboard were not sufficient enough to operate the plane fully, so I went out and bought a wireless mouse, a cell phone stand and I downloaded Opentrack. The most I spent on everything was $12; 6 for the mouse and $6 for the stand. And I opened the door to a completely different game. I’ve been lovestruck ever since then, and I went on to buy the full fidelity modules such as the Tomcat and the F16. This is a paragraph but I wrote it for newbies to this game; don’t get discouraged if the controls are hard to operate. Do yourself a favor and save some time and money by downloading a head tracking app, a stand, a wireless mouse and a joystick and watch how quickly you’ll get the hang it everything.
It may seem daunting at first but hang in there and read and research the modules, maps, controls and views, and watch how your enjoyment of DCS World will skyrocket. Happy hunting.
