इतिहास का सबसे जिंदादिल इंसान | 21 Amazing Facts About Stephen Hawking | PhiloSophic 

❤❤❤❤❤❤

जैसे मनुष्य पैदा होकर पीढ़ी से पीढ़ी अपने विचारों को चलाता है उसी आधार पर हमारे विचार होते है इसमें कोई नई बात नही के विचार की उत्पति सिर्फ present मे एक इंसान से हुई हो ये पीढ़ी से पीढ़ी तक चली आ रही है और जो है वो सिर्फ update हुआ है बाकी कुछ नया नही! ये मत सिर्फ स्टीफन हॉकिंग का नही बल्कि ये पीढ़ी से पीढ़ी तक चलते आ रहा है

nice bhai

Nice bro

Wow

Good thanks bhai

Very nice

Aapki Likhavat or Aapki samaj Bahut gehri he .....🌺🌺🌺

Agar bhagwan h to marne k baad aadmi jinda kyo nhi ho sakta

​@@nareshkumar-lz9rc Read Bible jesus christ 1st man जो मरके तीसरे दिन जिंदा हुआ!!

Yes bro

He didn't move the entire world. WTF are you writing?

@@moviesforyou9224 you won't get that bro🤣

Yes

By moving the world he also moved himself ... Modern problems need modern solution

Guff No Deauu.

Very good

all men should possess ! liza

Vo itne great h ki noble unke greatness ke aage chhota pad jayega ..unhe kisi puraskar ki jaroorat nhi h

@@kirtiverma8211 ha shi h

Nobel prize Mila hai bhai stepthen ko

Nhi mila mere bhai

Izat se unka naam lo bhau​@@mrhemanthp

YES

Osm ji

Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

Salute

FACTS CITATION FROM „Reactionaries and Einstein's Fame: “German Scientists for the Preservation of Pure Science,” Relativity, and the Bad Nauheim Meeting Jeroen van Dongen Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125, USA Institute for History and Foundations of Science Utrecht University P.O. Box 80.000 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands“ FACTS to 1918: 6 he has stolen the work of others and has mathematized physics to such an extent that fellow physicists have been left clueless. Furthermore, the article continued, Einstein had undertaken a propaganda campaign by which he had cast a spell both over the public and over academic circles... one of the shadier products of postwar Berlin. 8 Weyland also drew heavily on Lenard's more substantive objections to Einstein’s theory of relativity, which Lenard had published in 1918. 10 but Weyland contended that they had remained undisputed. Weyland’s shrill tone in his newspaper article and the highly public character of his accusations were indeed new, however. Also new was their thinly concealed anti-Semitic character: Weyland claimed that Einstein had “a particular press, a particular community [Gemeinde]” that kept feeding pro-Einstein stories to the public. enough: The widely circulating, liberal Berliner Tageblatt was published by Rudolph Mosse. FACTS (1919 - 1920) : Professionally non educated EDITORS ( non physicists ) and private owners of newspapers perpetrate really serious immoral act in science by that it hinders its natural development and creating an deceitful picture of Albert Einstein by his glorification: 12 In 1919 it had carried an article [13 autor Alexander Moszkowski (1851-1934), 15 editor-in-chief was Arnold Berliner (1862-1942)] announcing the results of the British solar eclipse expedition that rose to laudatory hyperbole, not shying away from declaring that “a highest truth, beyond Galileo and Newton, beyond Kant” had been unveiled by “an oracular saying from the depth of the skies.” 16 on December 14, 1919, the front page of the Berliner Illustrirte Zeitung [17 This newspaper had been founded by Leopold Ullstein (1826-1899)] carried a large close-up portrait of Einstein whose caption read: “A new eminence in the history of the world: Albert Einstein, whose researches signify a complete revolution of our understanding of Nature and whose insights equal in importance those of a Copernicus, Kepler, and Newton.” 2 The huge public acclaim that was accorded Einstein. It also vexed conservative academics (e.g. the Nobel Laureate Philipp Lenard have felt that the theoretical physicist Einstein had captured too much of the limelight, while other, experimental physicists were not appreciated enough.) FACTS Then followed (1920): Reactionaries and Einstein's Fame: “German Scientists for the Preservation of Pure Science,” Relativity, and the Bad Nauheim Meeting Jeroen van Dongen Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA 91125, USA Institute for History and Foundations of Science Utrecht University P.O. Box 80.000 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands Two important and unpleasant events occurred in Albert Einstein’s life in 1920: That August an antirelativity rally was held in the large auditorium of the Berlin Philharmonic, and a few weeks later Einstein was drawn into a tense and highly publicized debate with Philipp Lenard on the merits of relativity at a meeting in Bad Nauheim, Germany. 73 Nonetheless, tensions had been mounting. Max Planck was firmly in the chair, but prior to the debate--because he was still not certain whether Einstein would remain in Berlin--he appeared to be quite agitated. 74 Paul Weyland also was present at the debate--but this time he kept a low profile. Einstein and his wife Elsa were strongly affected by the exchange: Elsa suffered a nervous breakdown. 75 The Viennese experimental physicist Felix Ehrenhaft (1879- 1952) recalled that he had to take a highly upset Einstein out for a calming stroll in the park after the debate. Later that evening they avoided the uneasy company of their fellow physicists. 76 Both Lenard and Einstein left the conference deeply distressed. Lenard renounced his membership in the DPG--and even denied admittance to his office at the University of Heidelberg to any of its members. Albert Einstein und Philipp Lenard Dr. Charlotte Schönbeck Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg Fakultät für Mathematik und Naturwisse For nearly 100 years ago have been Nobel Prize winners said: The theory of relativity is a mathematical and not a physical theory. The theory is far from being confirmed experimentally, the results of the solar eclipse expeditions allow other interpretations The principle of relativity is only valid for mass-dependent movements The theory of relativity contradicts the fundamental ideas about space and time: the Euclidean space and the usual ideas of time must remain binding. What is Einstein´s closed vicious circle ? DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24875.18722 Projects: How to make Theoretical Physics valid for the longest Science from History to Future Both the Special & General theory of Relativity have been verified to high precision by a multitude of experiments only in Einstein´s closed vicious circle: Lorentz transformation equations local time local time covariant equations covariant equations physical definition of simultaneity physical definition of simultaneity invariant interval invariant interval Lorentz transformation equations is valid for all ... is valid for everything, is valid for any stupidity, is valid for any information. Special & General theory of Relativity not valid in real Universe. Change QUALITY 1905 A.E. : Einstein ´s theory Tkin =mc^2 - mo c^2 1996: Tkin id =mc^2 [ln |1-v/c|+ (v/c) / (1-v/c) ] Tkin ad = mc^2 [ln |1+v/c|- (v/c) / (1+v/c) ] Einstein's theory works only for v < 0.1c. REFERENCES [1] KAUFMANN, W.: Annalen der Physik, Vierte Folge, Band 19, Leipzig, 1906 Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth p. 487-552 [2] EINSTEIN, A.: Sobranie naučnych trudov v četyrech tomach pod redakciej I. E. TAMMA, Ja. A. SMORODINSKOGO, B. G. KUZNECOVA, Izdateľstvo "Nauka", Moskva 1966 [3] FIZEAU, M. H.: Sur les hypothéses relatives a l’éther lumineux. Ann. de Chim. et de Phys., 3e série, T. LVII. (Décembre 1859) Présente á l’Academie des Sciences dans sa séance du 29 septembre 1851. [4] KNOPF, O.: Annalen der Physik, Vierte folge, Band 62, 1920 :"Die Versuche von F. Harress uber die Geschwindigkeit des Lichtes in bewegten Korpern, von O. Knopf. p. 391 - 447 [5] PURCELL, E. M.: Electricity and magnetism. In: Berkley physics courses (Russian translation). Moskva, Nauka 1971. [6] FEYNMAN, R. P. - LEIGHTON, R. B. - SANDS, M.: The Feynman lectures on physics (Russian translation) Moskva, Mir 1965-1966. [7] Vlcek, L. : New Trends in Physics, Slovak Academic Press, Bratislava 1996, ISBN 80-85665-64-6. Presentation on European Phys. Soc. 10th Gen. Conf. - Trends in Physics ( EPS 10) Sevilla , E 9. -13 September 1996, Critical examination of fundamentals in physics www.trendsinphysics.info/ tuke.academia.edu/LubomirVlcek www.researchgate.net/search?q=Lubomir%20Vlcek vixra.org/author/lubomir_vlcek

Salute hai ayse insa ko

@@narendrasharma9225 A

Yes bro😮

मुझे हिंदू होने पर गर्व है 🧡🧡🧡🧡🚩🚩🚩🚩 जय श्री राम 🧡🧡🧡🧡🚩🚩🚩🚩

Apne Malik ko dhoondo warna bhari nuqsan ho jaayega.

Chup cute

I am proud to be a muslim😂

@@tarnummemon99 mujhe bhi.

sach kaha bhai

Mom dad

Nice

Yar pyar pyar hota hai koi khel nahi

Rat

the soul he may not have believed in?

Lekin ye kahata hai ki bhagvan kuchh nhi hai ye jhoot hai or unka Ye apmaan hai

Times by hawking .. joke Achha hai

do You believe him there is no god? He just atheist scientists like others

@@jaskaranitaly1671 He can be true or might have known the answer.there can be God if we believe & even not..It all depends on what we believe.I would suggest to always Believe in Science & also don’t get unattached from your religion.

Sir your voice is so beaut full

Yes

@@i_kartikk pp

The person who can't believe in the greatest truth of the universe "God", cannot be an inspiration for any sane human. Jab narq ki aag me jalega to uski saari theories dhari ki dhari reh jaegi , aur wo jal he raha hoga aaj bhi

@@mrinalkhandelwal9631 ye aap prove karke dikaye pahle fir hum believe karenge

I love white 444

I play ff

Wtf Copied comment bro 🖕🏿🖕🏿🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🖕🏿

@@idk-vg4fh i also like white and mr gamer

He was the most powerful man through his mind.he couldn't even get up of his chair and unfolded the truthes of the universe wish he was their to see the first image of a black hole

heaven is there it is sure ......

@@rahonkiroshni5237 no heaven no god

Was*

Was🤣🤣

But you are a gandu man

@@ritikumari6091 😂

pata bhi h kis cheez ka scientiest tha ye

Yes. He deserves it 😔

Yes

Wait he didn't got that yet what

Bahut badiya jankari hai

You R right

Yes bro, that's the ultimate thing

@@acrossb4750 lllll

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rbot0_mm_jE.html See it special for u

Really

❤❤❤

Bro yeh Sidha mana kar rha hai ki koi khuda koi jannat nhi hai to tum ishe inspiration kaise maan skte ho 😏🙄 Had hai

@@toufiqalam243 kya koi god ko nakarne se hum kya usse inspiration nahi le sakte? Ye to illogical baat hua

@@amlanadarshdas4470 Jo insaan God ko he nhi maanta wo to janwar se bhi badtar hai. Aur aise insaan ko apna inspiration bilkul nhi banana chahiye. Wo khud to kutte ki mout mara he hai, usko inspiration maanne walo ko bhi wo apne sath narq le jaega. God he is brahmand ka sabse bada sach hai, aur use chod kar koi bhi, ye sansaar nhi bana sakta hai. Ye big bang wagera sab man gadhanta theories hai jo aaj nahi to kal galat prove ho jaegi

@@toufiqalam243 Sahi hai.... Inspirational तो वो था जिसने 53 साल की उम्र में एक 6 साल की बच्चोब्से शादी की

@@hariprasaddhakad9074 sahi knowledge liya karo aur waise bhi tum log jitna bhi bolo lekin ek din aayega inshallah sabka gala bakri ki sar ki tarah kaate jayenge ghabrao mt beta

उग्जुध्न्जोक्सु

Stephen Hawking🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Stephen Hawking🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

@@samanbaniya6934 what have you written

@@priyasingh-px1pr Great Great Man

living legend in our minds, "memories"

.

Kya krte ho aap brother mujhe apse baat krni h call me 9897710362

Priyanshu Motivation B

Agr koi soche ki vo sun pe phch jae apni premika k liye chand tare tod laye to ky vo aisa kr sakte h i think u watch vdo of sandeep maheswari if you watch vdo of sndip mheswari then u should watch my ashrya and ur doubt and confusion clear

Yes friends

Very very nice anwer👍

Right

इच्छा सकतीं से जिंदा किंयू नेही रेह सकता मर किंयू जाते हैं भाई साहब अगर इच्छा सकतीं सब कुच होती तो दुनिया में पाँव टेकने की भी जगंहा ना मिलती सांस लेना तो दुर की बात है

Lol

😀😀👌👌😲😲

Yes very good brother 👍😲👍👍👍👍

He is nahi was😢😢

@@palwinderkaur6784 he was a great scientist

@@palwinderkaur6784 😢😢😢😢😢 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢.😢😢.

right😔😔😔😔😔

Yes..... 😭😭

Shadman abdulkalam Kalam yes he was great scientist

@@physicsexplorer8163 बहुत अच्छा लगा

@@kingvineetvvv3800 😃

@@physicsexplorer8163❤️👍

Leonardo di Vince

No.if he born total healthy so he never get that mind

He just died like 3 years ago tho

Great scientist 🙏🙏❤️❤️😭

Bhai 21 me bhi the

Great scientists

Y3eeeeeeeeeeeeeecggdqettioknc🙂😊☺☺☺😊😁😁😆😆😆😇🥰🥰🥰😇🙃😉😉😙🙂😘😊😊☺😀😎🤩🥳🥳🤗🤑🤩😔😞😒🤠🤠😡🤬😶😦😐😠😖😩👽👺👻💀🤖👽😈🤢

And you are the greatest idiots of 20th century

Yup

Yes

Yes

Koe nahi Janta brhmand kisane banaya

Know

@@rameshpatode9659 science knows who made universe

@@amlanadarshdas4470 ०00०

Nop

@@tokameya8880 big kick to your god 😂😂

He was 🙏

Samreen Asif great sir

Thanks for like my comments

@@physicsexplorer8163 thanks

Right said