कलयुग में कर्ण क्यों है महाभारत का सबसे ज्यादा पसंद किया जाने वाला पात्र | कर्ण : नायक या खलनायक 

Thanks!

⁠ Kuch bhi kaho par kya entry thi KARN ki AS PRABHAS Kalki movie me , mazza aa gaya tha dekhkar , goosebumps aa gaye the 😘😘😘

Kalyug hai ye bhai🙏 हरे कृष्ण ✨🙏

Sirf arjun nehi 5 pandav sabhi nehi bohat kuch sahi hai

Arjun ke saath uske baki 4 bhai the, lekin karn ne sacrifice akela kiya tha.

@@rebelman1097 akela sacrifice krne me aur maa aur bhaiyo k sath sacrife krne me jamin aasman ka fark hota hai, insaan chahta hai ki duniya ki saari musibat uspe aa jaye lekin uska parivar hmesha khush haal rahe, akela sacrifice krne wala vyakti keval apne aap ko sambhalta hai, lekin jis vyakti k sath uski mata aur uske 4 bhai sacrifice kr rhe ho uss insaan pe kya beet ti hai tuym kya jano ramesh babu.... Karn ne khub sacrifice kiya aur ant me adharmi aur paapi bn gya, Arjun aur uske 4 bhaiyo ne v sangharsh kiya lekin dharm ka marg nhi tyaga.... karn k baare me kisi ko nhi pta tha ki wo rajparivah ka hissa hai khud karn ko v nhi... lekin pandavo k baare me sbko pta tha ki ye maharaj pandu k putra hain, hastinapur k rajkumar... puura sansar janta tha ki hastinapur k rajkumar hote hue v ye khub sacrifice kr rhe hain....Karn ne aisa sacrifice kiya ki uske sacrife se Duryodhan aurt shakuni jaisa vyakti attract hota hai, aur pandavo ne aisa sacrifice kiya ki unke sacrifice se krishn bhagwan attract hote hain,Arjun ka sarthi tkk bnn jate hain..... antar hain bhai sacrifice me......kaha karn ka sangharsh aur kaha pandavo ka sangharsh......

Thanks!

Bahut sahi

Yes sahi hua hai,kyunki karn ko harane ki takat arjune main nahi thi😂😂 vo to nar tha,agar kabhi nar narayan ki katha padhi hogi to apko pata chala hoga ki nar aur narayan milkar hi karn ko maar sakte hain, bahut sahi hua kyun mahbahrat tak ki simit mat raho

Very well said, even now few people consider shri krishna biased towards arjun😂i mean how clownery of them to even say this. The reality is that people don't even want to consider the facts which is written in the scriptures. They just want to consume everything from serials because those serials satisfy them emotionally.

Yes, it's the effects of Kalyug and it is obvious. But we will keep enlighting people about it, and spread awareness. No doubt that in a fan-driven, world, the easiest way is to create content on fan-driven theories. Good going. Thanks!

Thanks

Bilkul sahi khaa!

Thanks!

Yes. Thanks!

​@@abhisvichar7609brother one more point Even though bori has mentioned that duryodhana did rajyabhishek of karna but brother this scene is fake and I am not lying but there are many references for it The khil bhag of Mahabharata harivansh puran mentions in harivansh the names of Anga Dynasty where it is mentioned that adhirath the karna,s father was in that lineage and he was even the king of Anga and after him karna became the king of Anga And it is not only mentioned in harivansh but even in matsya puran and some other purans that karna,s father was king of Anga not charioteer of dhritarashtra and brother in van parva karna tells that his father had a lot of jewels and if his was a charioteer of dhritarashtra,then how could be he so rich even he is the charioteer of king then also he cannot be that much rich that he could have a lot of jewels And brother in digvijay parva of Mahabharata it is mentioned as you have mentioned in your bhima,s video that he was defeated by bhima so it could be only possible if Anga was independent not under the rule of kuru and brother duryodhana was only a Rajkumar or prince not a Raja that he could make anyone king and brother even in our manusmriti ( vishudhh manusmriti of arya samaj ) which is a critical edition of manusmriti not only based on manuscripts research (less manuscript research)but based on various other points to find out interpolation(like contradictions in text itself, contradictions from Vedas as Vedas are said to be supreme, contradicting from manusmriti,s style,breaking the context and breaking the topic etc)it is mentioned that king must have some qualities then only he can be a king but no test was taken to check his qualities by dhritarashtra and bro in Mahabharata it is not mentioned who was king of Anga before karna but other sources mention adhirath as king of Anga and I know that in various videos you have told that it was done by duryodhana to get closer to karna in order to have an Archer against Arjuna but bro I am only giving points to tell you something new And talking about suta brother suta was a lineage who were the kings of Anga and in Mahabharata Anga us mentioned as suta rajya and brother that karna,s digvijay is fake and even cross refrences in bori aren,t correct and brother bori has told that they are now also in research of Mahabharata so bori is also not an authentic source and see brother bori even didn't removed various shlokas in Mahabharata where Bali and meat is mentioned and you know why because they only research on manuscripts they don't check these points which I had mentioned that how vishudhh manusmriti was made and brother these texts are also edited with time because they are giving good examples on how to live a life and they a historical proof so if someone wants to glorify someone or demean someone then one can edit these texts and it is also not mentioned for how many years Mahabharata was edited in my anumaan the editing of texts started from 4000 years ago so manuscripts will be changed like when they will find some old manuscript probably 2700 years old then many stories would be different from today's stories and iti is a fact and if you have read bori then clearly you can see there is contradictions even in bori ce like it mentions that vaishampayan told janmanjeya the story of Mahabharata in 24000 verses but today you could find that it is even more than 24000 may be 80000 or something so now you could imagine how much interpolation would have been done in these years And brother at last I would conclude that karna was heir to the Anga,s throne and probably he must have done something to get the throne without passing the test of a good ruler because you know karna did a lot of wrong things and Mahabharata mentions only some of his wrong deeds even if we read other texts we would come to know about his other wrong deeds also and his character doesn't matches with the traits mentioned for a king in manusmriti And brother only one reply to these tv serials if they really want that some friend of duryodhana who should be given respect because of his noble deeds then karna doesn't deserves that much respect only ashwatthama deserves this respect And last

​@@abhisvichar7609and brother Jai Shri Ram

Bro how Women Molester Karn who wants to see Women n@ked is Good ? 🤡

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks!

Thanks

Jai Shree Krishna!

Thanks!

😂😂 bilkool sahi bhai

​@@editorbhaiyajimeanwhile karna dragged bhima😂🎉

​@@AdityaSharma-gc1tbkarna dragging bhima is removed by bori there is no mention of karna dragging bheem only in some versions it is mentioned

@@suryanshsharma2683 read bori it's still mention

Karn ne jarasandh ko 1 din mei haraya thaa 😂😂 aur bhim ne 14 days mei

Karn is no anti hero like Rocky or pushpa karn is a pathetic man he was trained by guru dron and guru krip but still insulted them and he also insulted pitamah bishma he also insulted dropadi for no reason

Bhai baat yeh hain ki dhram adhram ke yudh main koi beech ka rasta nahi hain yhaan log dhram ke sath they ya adhram ke sath...Eventually, country ,state loses a lot because of people like pushpa and Rocky.

Ok. Thanks!

Rocky from KGf and all character you mentioned etc etc respected Women's. Didn't wanted to see Women N@ked. So stop with your Propoganda

​@@debamlyabanerjee4067no he didn't insulted droupati

Yes, it was Benam Badshah movie. Very well said. Thanks.

Bhai duryodhana chahey kitna bdha adhrmi hon per bhagha nahi tha..

@@aryaveerthakur4368 ha bahi bath tho thik hai par karn itni teji baghta 🏃💨 tha ki 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@debamlyabanerjee4067 shayad abhi Om Ganpatye ne aisa kuch RU-vid ka thumbnail bhi bnaya tha.

bhai phele Mahabharat padho Karn isliye bhaaga tha kyuki Woh apne puri sakti ke saath nhi yudh nhi kar rha tha dusra woh nashe mei ta aur pandav bhi nahsa Kara tha aur gandhrav uss Yudh mei maya ka prayog kar rhe The jo yudh Ke niyam ke khilaf tha. Aur woh log karn ko ek saath Teer maar rhe the aur phir Karn gayal ho gye unka dhanush,rath,sarthi,sab maare gye Tab karn Vikarn ke rath pe bethkar apni jaan bachane ke liye bhaage the Mei manta hu ki Arjun Sarvshestra Dhanudhar te but Karn bhi shestra Dhanudhar the

गन्धर्वैस्तु महाराज भग्ने कर्णे महारथे ।सम्प्राद्रवच्चमूः सर्वा धार्तराष्ट्रस्य पश्यतः ।। १ ।। वैशम्पायनजी कहते हैं- महाराज ! गन्धर्वांने जब महारथी कर्णको भगा दिया, तब दुर्योधनके देखते-देखते उसकी सारी सेना भी भाग चली ।। १ ।।​@@krishnadubey8382

Jai Shree Ram!

Ok. Thanks!

No karna is hero he lived his life for others

Karna ne to Draupadi ko isi liye veshya ,bola tha kyonki unhone bhari sabha me apman kiya tha

Asa bilkul nehi tha draupadi ne asa kuch nehi bola ​@@adarshyadav7428

​@@adarshyadav7428draupadi kab ki thi apaman karna ka?

Bilkul sahi khaa. Thanks!

Kuch bhi matlab

​@@Bhardwajshivbhaktabe sahi bol raha hai woh

​@@burnwood1979sahi he to fir yagya me kya karne aya tha karn 😂😂😂kuchh logic naam ka chiz he ki nahi Bhim ne digvijay me hastinapur se yodh kyu nahi ladha or hastinapur se ladhe bina karn se kese ladha 😂😂😂 Sirf ek slok he bhim ne karn ko pataka bass ho gaya bhim ne karn ko jit liya Uske baad karn yagya me ata he or pandvo se ghul mil kar raj mahal me ghumta he 😂😂😂

Bhaai digvijay me pandvo ka kisi tarah koi bhi yodh nahi hua tha hastina pur se jo jo rajya hastinapur ke sath the Ohh log sare yodhistir yagya kar raha he bolke sunte hi sabne yagya ke liye dan de diyethe Ye baat aap clearly shishupal se sun sakte ho jab shishupal yodhistir or krishn ji ko gali de raha tha

@@devrgndas3291 abe karn ne bheem se Lada tha jab woh anga rajya gaya tha usse rajsuya yagya ke liye nimantran Dene aur jab shishupala ne krishna ki insult ki thi tab karna waha par tha. Karna yagya mein nahi aana chahta tha par jab bheem ne usse hara diya toh usse aana pada

Ok. Thanks!

Bhai karna ke sath bahut jyada na insafi hui thi

Guru dron ne kabhi bhi karna or Arjun ka vastvik yudhh nahi hone Diya

Bhale hi karna ne adharm ka saath Diya ho lekin bo ek sachha Mitra tha

Sorry Putra karna m bahut saari batein sach dikhaiyen gayi hai or aapne use ek video banakar poora fake bata Diya

Ese toh star Plus bale Mahabharat me dropadi ne duryodhan ko andhe ka Putra andha nahin bola tha use saath khadi daasi ne bola tha or bhi bahut si fake baten dikhai gayi hai usme

Karn ne arjun ko samman nahi diya arjun ne karn ko wo samman diya jisse karn ko ajj jana jata hai arjun ne panchal raj drupad ko haryatha jissne karn ko hara diya tha arjun ne akhele hi puri uttar disha ko jeet liya tha, khandav ban main arjun ne akhele hi 33 devato ko haryatha or arjun ne akhele hi nivadh kavach, kalkaya or polomo ko bhi harya arjun ne gandhavo ko bhi harytha jinhone karn ko harya or virat yuudh jabki karn ne usske mukhabile kuch bhi nahi kiya😆😆😆😆😆

Konsi kirti? He was just an enemy of him. Pichre log? Maa brahman thi, pita kshatriya thee aur pichre hue ? The Beautiful Tree by Dharampal:- Till 1825, Shudras were taking education from gurukul, they were 10 times more than brahamans in some places. Pichre log? Aawaz? Joke of the millennia..😂 Some homework for uh 😋 * Varna Jati Caste, Rajiv Malhotra * The Beautiful Tree, Dharampal * Castes Of Mind, Nicholas Dirks * India That Is Bharat, J Sai Deepak * Breaking India, Rajiv Malhotra * Mahabharat Unravelled, Ami Ganatra

​@@debamlyabanerjee4067karn sabse bda bhai tha. Uski brahman maa ne use gange me pravahit kr dia tha. Agar wo pandav kul ke saath hota to chakravarti raja hota. Uska maan adhikar sab chin lya gya aur aap phir bhi uska upahas lar rhe hai. Krishn bhi unke samarthya se prabhavit hur the jab unho ne unka rath 3 pag piche dhakela tha. Unka samman kre pls.

​@@TeraBaap-lw2kp to phir sud putra karn se unki maa ne nadi me kyo pravahit kiya? Aur jab unko yudh ke pehle pta chal gya tha ki karn unka beta hai to unho yudh rok kar karn ko raja kyo nhi banwaya ? Kya jawab hai aapke pas inka ?

@@user-fb5ih8lk1p wo rath ko 3 pag piche dakel ne ki bath buss serial main hai books main nahi Or jo karn gandharvo se har jaye wo uss rath ko kese dakhele ga jisspar kudh naryan hai or karn raja nahi bannta kuki wo shadi se phele payda hua tha tho usska singhashan par koi hak nahi tha

Kara bhumi me khare huye ladai kar raha tha. Or bramhastra ko call kiya tha

ek sawal ka jawab dega , tu grey character he ki nahi ??

Har kisi kaa kundal nehi giraa thaa... BORI ye bhi boltaa hai ki karn ne participate kiyaa thaa

Ok. Thanks!

​@@abhisvichar7609😂 lol ESA Karne ko khud sooryanaryan ne kaha tha

Karna ne jaise abhimnyu ko rath de diya tha. Khud to dhnush peeche se kaata tha..ab bhul mat jaana apne character ko mhaan btate hue ki Krishna ne khud last main bolna ki karna jab khud ki jaan pe aa gyi to dhram adhram ka gyaan de rhe hon..yudh tha koi khel nahi..yhaan maarna hota hain..bhai fangiri se upar uthho..

And yes Shri Krishna was involved in every killing. So now what, Shri Krishna did wrong. They all deserved to be killed by any ways.

Krishna ye chij Yudhishthir ko saanti dene k liye bolte hain,, kaurav paks me sirf bhurisraba ko chhod k kisi ko bhi anyaay se nehi mara gayaa thaa..... Dron samadhi me sarir chhod chuke the jab dhritadyumn unkaa sir kaat diyaa

Both are ADHARMI

​@@consciousworld9161no

Usne nahi kaha

Don't cherrypick as an excuse to save your favourite. Krishna himself said Karna - where were you when draupadi was humiliated. Krishna ordered Arjuna to kill adhrmi karna.

I am not telling karna my favourite, what you tell is true and what I tell is also true it is mentioned after death of king Duryodhana you can read . As an unbiased you should admit it that except Shalya all kuru chiefs were slain through "adharm" (exact same word is used by Mr Debroy ) Hope i clarify you .

​@@aryaveerthakur4368now stunning is i mention exact same written in book And 4 maharathis are mentioned here Now how can you guess among these 4 i am telling for karna only ?? 😂

@@priyansukarmakar9787 yes, it is said but having said that bori mentions karna died fighting ( that specific Karna parva episode, where they are fighting ). Since all mahabharat warriors were too strong whether Abhimanyu, Karna, killing someone was not possible without taking aid of unfair means. Now since it was war so people kill each other, whether Arjuna killing Bgurushrava, or Abhimanyu getting killed. For Karna this is used as an excuse by radical fans as Karna was invincible and without that it was impossible to kill. But if you reacall the last moment, Arjuna was ready to release raudraastra and karna's all adjacent advisors, pop taking care of chariot fighting with him all were killed. With the wheel struck, karna kept on fighting and then asked to wait on which Krishna replied why you are concerned about dharma and adharma now..then subsequently Karna was killed. Chal is often used as an excuse for Karna .

@@priyansukarmakar9787 Yes, because radical fans only use this in Karna's favour as an excuse. At the end of day or was war, and it means ppl will be killed in any ways.