Why did Nathuram Godse kill Mahatma Gandhi? आपसे अनुरोध इस वीडियो को अधिक से अधिक शेयर करें और हमारा चैनल अवश्य ही सब्सक्राइब करें। सब्सक्राइब के साथ बैल आइकन दबाना ना भूले ताकि आपको द इंडिया पोस्ट के सभी वीडियो प्राप्त हो सकें। बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद
#NathuramGodse
#RealityOfGandhi
#मैंने_गांधी_को_क्यों_मारा
#न्यायमूर्ति_खोसला
#नेताजी_सुभाष_चन्द्रबोस #नाथूराम_गोड़सेजी
बापू की हत्या के बाद गोडसे ने कोर्ट में दिया था 90 पेज का बयान
www.theindiapost.com/articles...
Original F.I.R. Mahatma Gandhi Assassination case - 1948
www.theindiapost.com/uncatego...
आखिर गाँधी वध के बाद किसने करवाया था चितपावन ब्राह्मणों का नरसंहार ?
www.theindiapost.com/articles...
क्या देश मे गांधी पर चर्चा अपराध है? क्या लोकतंत्र में गांधी की आलोचना/समालोचना अपराध है ? महात्मा गांधी को राष्ट्रपिता की उपाधि किस संविधान के अंतर्गत प्रदान की गई थी ?
• क्या देश मे गांधी पर च...
Justice Khosla after retirement, in a pen picture of the Court scene as it then passed before his mind’s eye has said, “The highlight of the appeal before us was the discourse delivered by Nathuram Godse in his defence. He spoke for several hours, discussing, in the first instance, the facts of the case and then the motive which had prompted him to take Mahatma Gandhi’s life.
“The audience was visibly and audibly moved. There was a deep silence when he ceased speaking. Many women were in tears and men coughing and searching for their handkerchiefs. The silence was accentuated and made deeper by the sound of an occasional subdued sniff or a muffled cough…
“I have, however, no doubt that had the audience of that day been constituted into a jury and entrusted with the task of deciding Godse’s appeal, they would have brought in a verdict of ‘not guilty’ by an overwhelming majority Nathuram had displayed the same ability while arguing his case before Shri Atma Charan, the Judge of the Special Court, Red Fort, Delhi.”
Justice Achhru Ram observed:
“Of all the appellants Nathuram V. Godse has not challenged his conviction under Sec. 302 of the Indian Penal Code, nor has he appealed from the sentence of death passed on him in respect of the offence. He has confined his appeal and also his arguments at the Bar only to the other charges which have been found proved against him. He personally argued his appeal, I must say, with conspicuous ability evidencing a mastery of facts which would have done credit to any counsel.”
As regards Nathuram’s power of thinking, the Judge noted :
“Although he failed in his matriculation examination, he is widely read. While arguing his Appeal, he showed a fair knowledge of the English language and a remarkable capacity for clear thinking.”
In the course of arguments, Nathuram had made a ple that on January 20, 1948 he was not present at the Birla House. The judges rejected the plea. In support of their rejection, they referred to their observations of the strong will power of Nathuram.
Shri Achhru Ram says :
“We have seen quite enough of Nathuram during the period of more than five weeks we were hearing these appeals and particularly during the eight or nine days while he was arguing his own case, and I cannot imagine that a man of his caliber could have even entertained the idea (of remaining behind).”
11 дек 2017
