नास्तिकों के सवाल 

Same thing is happened with me. Hare krishna 🙏🙏🙏

Please share your experience .

Please exprience yourself

@@kamaldey6137 Even if he shares his experience, it doesn't matter because you won't believe it. It makes no difference unless you experience it yourself. For that, you need to purify your senses and walk on the path of unalloyed devotion, just like one has to get enrolled in IIT (or some other engineering college) to actually eventually get the experience of becoming an engineer.

Even terrorist who killed people also believed their task was for the service of their god. They never asked for proof.

Pacemaker se ruke huye heart ko chalate hai.....

Jo reincarnation ke 5000+ cases he vo kya he

Need to learn bhgwat geeta

Hare

Hare Krishna

Sontkke Reservation in job bund kiya tao tuze sub sahi samaj ayega.....its 100% true hi....jiska DP rakha hi whao bhi Hindu dharm ka follower thaa....

Last line Bhgwan sabhi Vastu ke karan H bt unka Koi karan Nhi Unhone Sabko bnaya h bt unhe Kisi ne Nhi bnaya

Adi purush H Krsna' Means Jab Khi pr Kuch Nhi tha Tb Vohi the ♥

We created god

Parmatma is a feature of krishna,the supreme personality of godhead

Galat sawaal. Paramatma matlab sarva kaaran kaaranam. Unke liye koi kaaran (origin/cause) nahi hai.

What you do for Humans? Why not you give your home to Poor people...

incorrect reply . you need to give explanations

Haste raho phir

We are also eternal spirit soul.... Hare Krishna.... We are Badhjeev we have limited brain.... Do you know Lord KRISHNA is Lord Ram , Lord Narsimagh , Lord Vishnu , Lord Budha , Lord Chatanya... Krishna appear in infinite forms....

Very Good point

And irony is that you are saying Gita a normal ordinary book. Krishna says in Bhagvad Gita that the people who are of demonic mentality never accept my supremacy.

No man... You can easily prove it by logic .

Kya baat hai sir ji.

#HARE KRISHNA god is complete so if u consider god as male then he is imcomplte bcz he dont have female properties in the other hand if u consider him as female then the same logic again applicable also so logically the conclusion is god is both!! thats why god manifest him as krishna(male) nd radhika(female) ...so he is two in one.

1. If god is perfect, how can it make an imperfect world? 2. Why should we believe geeta? Is there any other reference where it is written that everything geeta says is correct except geeta? 3. I don't believe that the God doesn't exist, I know for sure. Because if it existed, lots of troubles would begin. This scriptures were simply written by a person. Its a common sense.

#HARE KRISHNA prabhu ji, why u beleive there is no god? give the ans with proper logic plzz nr proof? prove that there is no god plzz ! hari bol

I don't believe that there is no god, I know for sure. Because there is no such evidence of that thing. And which is not proved yet, the question of disproving that is illogical.

Arindam Mondal #HARE KRISHNA do u think that all things need material proof to be truth? how silly concept ... hari bol

Unhone mbbs doctor the

@@tanmoysarkar.4621 mbbs kiya tha

Pap to hmesha hi rhega

Who made this big bang can you explain me

Dwarka excavation

Ye kutark jhandu journey ka hai , iski kaat hai ki beta tum dono ko compare nahi kar sakte , kar bhi liya toh comic ka adhaar speculation hai sastra la adhaar logic + bhagvaan hai

There is no difference between lord krishna and Vishnu. Krishna is the "Avatar" of lord vishnu. But We Serve lord krishna cause, krishna is the full form of lord vishnu- "Krishnastu Bhagwan Shayam". Hare Krishna🙏

If you really read vedic scripture then you realize that bramha Vishnu and shiv is come from vasudev (krishna) plz read srimad bhagvatam it is the saar of all veda and puran

Year kaliyuga aaye hai fir baghwan madad nahi karte

Both devil and Human are creation of Krishna..but their purpose is different..when Human strts taking only for humans and not god these type of situation arises..it's not fault of creation of Krishna but it's fault of half minded human being

Usko Indian passport hein

Hare Krishna.... We are not Indian or American or African or chinese .... We spirit soul..

Hnji Swadesh is his favourite movie

He is Supreme creator,he said that, but you have to study Geeta to know it. If he is a good messenger than how he can get those messeges? And he also Didn't said he is the son of god or messenger.

Koi agar uski sunoga to fir aise ghinone kaam nahi karega. Parmatma baitha hai par unhone tumse tumhari freedom of life nhi chini na. Warna Tum robot hote. Robot k paas freedom nhi Hoti par humare paas hai. Agar such me koi sudharna chahta hai to parmatma use guide karte hai bcoz wo humare se force se kuch bhi karate. Jo karte hai wonhum karte hai aur uska fal bhi bhog te hai

Its your mind dear

Bhakt log k liye Bhagwan Arth hai ,chamatkaat,jadu ,tona ,ityadi andhvishwashi ,chije karnewala bhagwan hai.

I knew this sloka. That's why I said Vedas have statements that seem contradictory. Different statements are for people with different consciousness. The above is directed towards atheistic class of people. Bhagavad Gita is summary of all Vedas and Upanishads, and is the conclusive statement, as accepted by all the previous bonafide acharyas (Sri Ramanujacarya, Madhvacarya, Visnusvami and Nimbarka) who acquired knowledge through transcendental senses and intelligence, which transcends the limits of space and time. We should not try to understand the statements of Vedas with out limited material senses and intelligence that cannot delve into many things. For example, in Bhagavad Gita Sloka 15.9 - 11 it is said, a transcendentalist can only see how a living entity leaves one body and takes up another body, and those who are not transcendentalist cannot although they try to.

Wrong on two counts: Firstly this is not an Atheistic statement but an agnostic one. Secondly, there is no contradiction here since this is a factual statement because we have no evidence of anyone's presence during the origin of the universe.

Wrong on two counts: Firstly this is not an Atheistic statement but an agnostic one. Secondly, there is no contradiction here since this is a factual statement because we have no evidence of anyone's presence during the origin of the universe. The rest of the remark is without any evidence whatsoever!

generalist2000 says: “Ajita - All of your statements above are based on the absolute trust or, as I would say, faith on the knowledge or evidence gained through material senses and intelligence. Material senses and intelligence are faulty and prone to errors. That's why, as you yourself noted, they keep changing. Such absolute trust also precludes the possibility that knowledge can also be revealed. Such revealed knowledge has been passed down as Shrutis to ancient sages. Vedas mean four vedas and Upanishads contained...” Ajita’s reply: Indeed generalist2000, all knowledge is based on trust. They are not based on faith because “faith” is “pretending to know something which one does not know”. Here are two examples to distinguish the two (1) getting a non-pilot to fly your plane (with you sitting as a passenger) for the first time, without any training would require faith. The get a pilot (person trained to fly planes) to fly your plane takes trust. (2) If you go to a priest to pray for becoming well after a gunshot injury takes faith while going to a trauma surgeon for help after a gunshot injury requires trust. Indeed, material senses and even intelligence may be faulty, but that is the best we have. There is no such thing as absolute trust, trust is based on probability and prior experience. This is why you choose a doctor whom you trust the most. However, when provided with additional information about an even better doctor, you would be wise to pick the one that is better. “Better” is based on evidence provided. Yes, knowledge can be revealed by someone who has the knowledge. To learn medicine, one goes to medical school, to learn engineering, one goes to engineering school, and to learn economics, one goes to the school of economics. How many doctor do you know who have the knowledge of medicine “revealed” to them by sitting at home? Your statement about revealed knowledge in the Vedas being passed by Shruti to ancient sages needs clarification. What exactly happened in order to make this knowledge appear in the minds of the composers of the Vedas? Are Shakespeare’s sonnets a result of the same Shruti?

+Ajita Kesakambli _" To learn medicine, one goes to medical school, to learn engineering, one goes to engineering school, and to learn economics, one goes to the school of economics"_ And to learn about your SELF, you need to go to a theology class. _"How many doctor do you know who have the knowledge of medicine “revealed” to them by sitting at home?"_ Thta is because the object of knowledge is not at home. If the object of knowledge is you yourself, where else you will find its knowledge, except in books and your own self?

Congress

Upr ek powerful light h jisne creation kiya h sbhi trh k logo ko bheja h

SHREE KRISHAN

God indian hai?

@@kpsingh345 No

@@kpsingh345 Ye country distinctions humans ne banaya hai.

आपको पहले पुरी गीता पढ़ना चाहिए फिर उसमे उत्तर मिल जायेगा