In one of the examples given in this deshana, why the husband was meant to achieve one status (margapala) higher than the wife always, in the explanation? Is it said so in Buddha’s teachings? Has it never occurred in many instances that the wife achieved a higher status than the husband? Isn’t it more appropriate to say that the husband and the wife both could achieve status or margapala, similarly such as Sowan, Sakurdagami, Anagami, Arahant? Such shallow comments are not accepted in or worthy of a noble teachings of a Buddha. Perhaps when the Bhikku achieved at least a Sothapanna status, he will understand Dhamma more clearly or better. Also, another example given about a family’s tragedy, with details and the aftermath, although the people do not know them, it’s a violation of that said family’s privacy. I wonder whether the utterance of the story was completely devoid or free of Raga, Dwesha & Moha. Apart from a few shortcomings the Deshana is good. Discipline is required in all aspects of a Bhikku. Theruwan Saranai! 🙏🙏🙏
Kosol rajathuma buddhathwaya patha paaramithaa purannauu mahaa bosathananwahansee namaki. ethakota athara magadi niwan dakinne ne. mam ahala thiyena widiyata ea uththamaya apa bidupiyanan wahansegen niyatha wiwaranayak laba atha. 🙏🙏🙏
