There was some proof that Ayutthaya had influenced Cambodia after the post-Angkor Era for nearly 400 years. Yet, not mean controlled completely, it was more like the subordinate kingdom of Ayutthaya after Ayutthaya conquered Angkor ( Krong Pra Visanok lok). Khmer king during lungvek had to send the precise tribute to Ayutthaya. Therefore, yes there would be culture influenced much or less after the post-Angkor Era. However, if we recognize historically, during the Khmer Empire from the 9th century to the late 15th century before Ayutthaya gained power over the Khmer kingdom-- Khmer culture heavily influenced Ayutthaya, Sukhothai kingdom. This means that the Khmer art, culture, and so on had been used or impacted in Ayutthaya before Ayutthaya influenced the Khmer Kingdom after the post-Angkor Era. Thus, recap e everything, Khmer culture, and art influenced Siam before Ayutthaya gained power. Then, Ayutthaya influenced Khmer after the post-Angkor Era. It is recycling. Yet, the architecture of Angkor wat, Phnom Rhoung, Phimia, Wat Phu, and the rooftops of Wat Chaiwattanam are all indicated and symbolize Khmer architecture, art, and culture. We can see the new design of both Thai and Khmer architecture is so similar after the 16th century from now. This is because the Ayyutta Kingdom had influenced the Khmer kingdom after its defeat and lost power gradually. For universal, if the enemy is strong than you. you have a choice. First, follow them and be under their rule. Much or less Cambodia that time must accept the culture of Siam. If not, you will have vanished. Same as Ayyuttaya that time was influenced by the Khmer empire. I really wish to see both nations understand this and accept the truth. Believe it or not Khmer and Thai are the same blood-- we are divided to hate each other because of political and individual aiming power.
@@ขุนเขาแห่งความสงบ siamese took khmer dancers back to their royal palace every-time they attack Angkor. Basically what siam had was a modified “Siamese” version of what khmer already had. Just because Khmers was under Siamese suzerainty did not mean our culture disappear Are you sure Siamese art and culture is 100% Siamese? ☺️
ប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រកម្ពុជាអ្នកបាននិយាយភាគច្រើនជាការពិត។ សូមអរគុណ ประวัติศาสตร์ของกัมพูชาที่คุณพูดคือส่วนใหญ่เป็นความจริง ขอขอบคุณ The history of Cambodia you say is mostly true. Thank you.
It's the other way around cause Siam benefited from Cambodia. The word Thai or Tai, in general, didn't exist at the during the Ayutthaya period. This is according to Chris Baker who is an archaeologist studying Ayutthaya temples and his book The history of Ayutthaya
