As public facing professionals, companies, weather cooperate or independent, have a vested interest in the community that they serve. It is the responsible, personable thing as a professional, to approach general members of the public, regardless of there capacity or status in the community, with well meaning inquiry or good faith. This ensures good report and morale whilst reinforcing the necessary standards or integrity of the professional. What we do here, whilst we are here, should be for each other, if we become unwilling to live in service of one other, as equals, then we betray our humanity and forsake our brothers and sisters. We don't get to choose what other people do but we can choose what we as individuals do, and if we aren't prepared to regard other people as equals- we forsake our children. We model behavior to them that is of no use. We can all be wrong but what's right is more important than who is right. Our rights, together.
Peeping through windows looking at ladies You said you were going to reception but you never went I find this kind of auditor just waiting confrontation to boost their ego
I agree that the behaviour of some of the staff is unprofessional and reflects poorly on the company, but at the end of the day, it is not a public place. You are trespassing. You state you are allowed to if the gate is open. Actually, you aren't. If some random person (probably masked) turns up and starts walking round a private industrial site filming, and sticking his camera in the windows, you shouldn't be surprised if it causes concern and you're challenged. Either you are being disingenuous or you are sorely lacking in common sense. It's clear that you were not just 'looking for reception'. It's a pretty pointless video really, except that it's clearly intended to generate attention for you and your channel. And this is not a 'hate' or 'troll' comment. It's just a cold, honest assessment of what you're up to. You also taunt them by telling them you are putting their faces on RU-vid and other social media. Are you registered as a data controller? Are you sure you know what you're doing here? RU-vid really need to step in and stop this activity. You are trespassing (a civil wrong) and arguably committing criminal offences - aggravated trespass and a public order offence. Apart from that, it's unfair on the people caught in the video, who are just blameless innocent people that you are bothering at work. You have not blurred out their faces, which I am pretty sure puts you in breach of data protection laws. Yes, to repeat, the response of some of them is unprofessional, but you brought this nonsense to them, with respect. I say all this with due kindness and respect. Please find something more constructive to do with your time. There are other ways to make money on social media that don't involve infringing the rights and dignity of other people.
@@TheBoringAuditorUk I'm sorry but that won't cut it. Even if the area is publicly-accessible, it is still trespass. You have literally recorded the evidence of you trespassing. Your own recording clearly shows that you were not looking for reception. What you were looking for is drama and confrontation for your channel. I know it's not your first audit, and you are going down a bad road and I urge you to stop. Auditing harms people and undermines liberties and rights of photographers. And are you registered as a data controller with the ICO? You do realise that you are required by law to do so? I'm now waiting for you to delete my comments and block me like all the other auditors do.
@@TheBoringAuditorUk It's spelt 'you're', not 'your'. That's another thing you haven't got right. I know that getting things right can be boring, and none of us get it right all the time - I make mistakes as well - but if you're going to go round criticising and judging people in the way that you do, then don't you think you need to get the law right? You can attract all the likes and clicks and money in the world, but if you're wrong, you're wrong. Facts are facts.
@@streetvideoreviewerJournalist exemption means auditors are not classed as Data Handlers, and there is no need to blur facial images, nor have signed waivers from those caught on camera, as they fall under the term Incidental Inclusions. (Edited, after YT deleted my reply to your response below!) I spoke with ICO, and was informed that GDPR & DPA ONLY applies to businesses & organisations, not private individuals. As such, and irrespective of the social media account(s) name(s), these videos are simply Freedom of expression. No further need to dress them up as Artistic, Public Interest, or the like. Thank you for giving me the impetus to clarify this Journalism aspect.