‘HIGH PRICES’ PRESIDENT: Biden’s ‘climate obsession’ is hurting the economy, GOP sen says 

U tube is not on your side they kiss butt for the left the woke and the Dems. 👈🤮

We're gonna keep it red! Go Tampa!

Climate obsession???? just ignore it like good morons!!

true, Bidens 1rst executive order was shutting down keystone pipeline, 2nd was 31 executive orders to disable border security

Hey sweetie i got 2 words for ya FJB! TRUMP 2024!

I see people waiting for their turn at the charging station at my local Walmart & people charging hanging out playing on their phones looking bored as heck. Not how I wish to spend my time LoL

Only a good second car for rich people

Electric cars preceded ICE cars. They went largely obsolete due to problems with the battery. The battery remains a big heavy costly problem. Net Zero is economically destructive delusional insanity. It needs to be abandoned and the most economical energy resources available need to be utilised.

Climate obsession???? just ignore it like good morons!!

In comparing the cost of climate impacts assuming BAU emissions nearly any net-zero emission plan is ASTRONOMICALLY inexpensive by comparison. $10 trillion seems like a lot, until you realize doing nothing for the next 50 years leads to $400+ trillion of expected damages - in that context $10 trillion no longer seems so bad

The issue is not whether to do or not do something to minimize the climate impact. The issue is that US car manufacturers are milking it as an excuse instead of making the low cost EVs we need and want. AND they successfully blocked the import of those very EVs that we could be buying since they failed. If they don’t do their part you can't expect citizens to do theirs at 3-5 times the price.

@@nospamallowed4890 EV transition is a part of the overall cost, but several magnitudes lower compared to what is needed in the overall energy industry. Furthermore the EV transition is more of a secondary option. The first and more impactful would be a systematic redevelopment of urban design, however given the complexities of changing urban design at scale with consideration for permitting it is widely theorized that you could not effectively complete such a transition in 50 years therefore EVs are a mor immediate half-measure solution to resolve the largest risks from an emission standpoint.

Climate obsession???? just ignore it like good morons!!

I mean if your getting your information about climate plans, risk from climate change and engineering solutions from AOC - well thats your first problem. She does not have any background in really any of the fields of science nor any practical history of working in any industry related to solutions for climate plans or assessing climate risk. Whats truly sad is that you put more faith in AOC's beliefs than US National Labs that run exascale analysis on US infrastructure systems combined with over 100 major satellite systems in joint risk analysis meetings with NOAA, DOD, DHS and FEMA to test vulnerabilities of the US relative to climate disasters.

@@MattBuild4 That may be true, She does not have any background in really any of the fields of science, but her purpose for pushing, is not climate, but to change the flow of money

@@SSB-8 Ok so why not instead support plans by institutions that actually know what theyre talking about and are extremely forthcoming about why they are supporting specific actions? Ive long said don support the Green New Deal - instead support the National Renewable Electricity Futures Plan. TLDR version - the latter has astronomically more information

@@MattBuild4 I was not arguing, 400ppm from 180-240ppm approx. 100%, but it makes you wonder if the solutions they push or is another, and not being pursued for person gain

@@SSB-8 Full discolsure I dont support the political plans that have come out over the last decade in large part because they contradict the every study ive read on the topic of decarbonization plans. Especially those for the US. A major issue I have with the Biden's administration's plans and the GND to an extent is that these energy transitions grossly underappreciate the real cost and scale required for grid modernization necessary to sustain net-zero emission portfolios. Its honestly a joke what was allocated in the IRA and BIC. $74 billion is a lot of money yes, but for infrastructure and especially heavy civil infrastructure at continental scale..... its a joke. The US Electrical Grid spans 3.4 MILLION miles.... Over 60% of which was built over 50 years ago. 650,000 of this is transmission line, which per the EIA in 2019 the average market cost of transmission was $2.54 million per mile. At that cost (which assumes ZERO inflation, ZERO supply chain issues, ZERO wage increases, ZERO permitting issues) $74 billion gets you 800 miles. Its absolutely absurd to think that would be sufficient. It really makes you wonder who the administration actually talked to when they created these bills, considering the fact there are published publicly available cost estimates from energy managers, interconnection managers, independent system operators, engineering institutions, federal managers, international managers and US National Labs forecasting the net cost of grid modernization to sustain a net-zero position at $2-$2.5 TRILLION - you know just a bit off....

Fighting for Israel?

No matter what the GOP does in the house, when it gets to Schumers desk, if they don't like it because it lacks money for them, it sits. Want the GOP to fight inflation? Vote out the Democrats in the Senate and the house, then action will happen, until then no matter what happens in the house, it falls to the floor in the senate.

All I see you democrats doing is telling BS democray lies

Climate obsession???? just ignore it like good morons!!

There were easily triple those numbers 200 years ago. so what are you complaining about.?

@@55points In terms of deaths, that is very likely but that is not really what I am looking at. Look at the cost per year and events per year. See the trend?

🥺"can I get a cost of living adjustment doing your totally not fake job"? 😡NO!!!!!

Climate obsession???? just ignore it like good morons!!

So, you're saying that energy prices are actually LOWER than they were under Trump?

What is your source of info? Even if lithium was available in the US, it would require major strip mining and mass destruction to dig it up.

It wasn't just "found" it was known to be there for a decade or more. EPA prevents them from mining it! We are NOT producing more energy than when under Trump, we produced enough that we no longer were importing, no longer the case because of ByeDone.

@@robertheinkel6225 I mean Thacker Pass has a massive amount of lithium. This single mining operation has an annual yield capacity that would single handidly 30X domestic production. Course its been stuck in regulatory purgatory since 2004...... I think Biden fast tracked it, which would be good PR for him, but it looks to be right back into federal lawsuits because neighboring populations want the non-contaminated rocks to be loaded and shipped out 600 miles across state lines instead of just spreading onsite.