When Pat Gelsinger promised to leave AMD in the rear-view mirror for good he probably should have also grabbed a map to make sure that he was actually going in the right direction 😂
NASA is nothing more than a tax collector rockets cannot fly in space there is nothing for it to PUSH OR PULL any type of rocket into space would be free floating and not moving but keep voting and praying both an illusion just like space travel
I'm playing around with mine now. Mine is right on the edge of stability and just another 100mhz on the cache frequency will cause a hard crash immediately.
Intel really traded stability stability and temp, to beat AMD in cinebench by a few point and now might have lost not just gamer but server in their stupidity because they overreacted to competition
Man I been saying Intel was lost for 4 years and just got heckled by tech blog masses. Can't believe I'm reading this stuff now. It tooks years for popular opinion to move and the hate to simmer down for AMD fans.
Intel: "Why don't you git gud, losers?" *while slapping AMD in the face* AMD: *slap Intel in the face after a decade of their abuse* Intel: *Now suffering from PTSD and refusing to go therapy* Meanwhile Nvidia is constantly struck in Top 10 anime battle with it's past self
I bought a 13900k when it launched. I spent months off and on trying to diagnose why it wasn't stable. I ended up having to drop my ram speed to ABSURDLY low speeds to get stability in any sort of testing. I could get no help from support and was told I was to blame. I just assumed I got very unlucky with a bad sample. Looks like I am done with intel. I should also mention it go more unstable over time, requiring me to come back and underclock even more about a year later.
Keep emailing them because I got blamed for overclock when I came back with it's a K version that overclock to 5.8 im getting a replacement Tomorrow and have 30 days to send defect one back to Intel
All the back yard renovation AND Tech News, too! Thank you, Joe and Paul! Everyone does their version of the Tech News, but your witty and sarcastic delivery ever reminding me that I am at the mercy of the manufacturers and vendors is second too none. While there isn't much that can be done, I can at least laugh about it while bending over and taking whatever they dish out while they line their pockets with cash.
@@rhythmandblues9302 Now I know why the prebuilt i9s are cheaper or at least the same price than the i7. Just yesterday, I came close to buying an MSI Aegis, i9-14900K AIO cooler, 32GB RAM, 2TB NVME with a 4080 super for $2300. Glad I had second thoughts.
Damn, intel absolutely dropped the ball on this. People expects Intel to be the pinnacle of stability while amd has become a meme on how unstable it is. But now, it's the other way around. Jumped to amd for the first time on the 7800x3d with a 6000mhz cl30 ram kit and it's been rock solid for the past 7 months. I hope Intel can fix this on the 15th Gen or people will jump ship soon; end users and enterprises!
it's been like a year since AMD chips were literally catching fire. They're never going to be seen as the pinnacle of stability. It's more likely that Intel has finally succumbed to ye olde diversity.
It always makes me laugh when people try to picture Intel as stable and reliable. I only had problems since Intel began to fall behind and desperately tried to keep up with AMD. Luckily I switched to AM5 last year and don't have to deal with random crashes anymore.
I didnt just spend on a 13900KS but I got an 800$ mobo with a 4090 and cant get 2hrs of gameplay without a crash. This is gonna turn into a class action lawsuit.
that is my issue. even if Intel refunds my 13900k, I still have my Z790 Hero which means I'm stuck with 13th or 14th (12th is too slow) which is clearly defective.
@@user-ol9zd1zy4xNot really? At the very least faster than the instability issues that stall you out completely It’s not like it’s an i7-4770K and you’re back on DDR3. It’s just 2-3 generations old. Ryzen 2000 would still be fine going backwards from Ryzen 5000 but of course it’ll be a bottleneck if literally everything else is current. (Though a more apt comparison would be going Ryzen 3000 from Ryzen 7000 in terms of performance loss but they’re AM4 vs AM5 so of course different socket)
I just ordered an i9-12900KF to replace that goddamn heat plate that is my i9-13900K. Thank God my Z790 motherboard can fit a 12th gen. I'm tired of riding the dragon. I regularly hit TjMax. It's gotten to the point I can't even use Unity any longer, and doing things like exporting videos from Premier causes my process to try to cook itself even if I'm using the GPU for everything that I can. I hit TjMax so much and it throttles so much as a result that I honestly get better results with my older 9th gen build. I NEVER hit TjMax on my previous build, and I actually have a better AIO cooler on this new build than I do with the 9th gen build. I've got aggressive curves on my fans and my poor pumps are working overtime just to keep it under 50c for light loads. Any heavy loads and I'm hitting 80c immediately and spiking in the 90s with the occasional dance with TjMax at 100c.
contemplating what you did, just from a 14700k to 12900kf, But those temps on your config are a concern too. What AIO did you get (ie 280, 360 ect), what case, and what speed are you running you ram? Contract frame and thermal paste used?
Not right is an understatement for these processors. Numerous people have substantially underclocked and undervolted them and the 13900K and 14900K processors keep on having crashes.
@@evildarkeevildark5943 some assume it's about cpu-cache conectivity, which was changed in 13 gen, that's why 12 gen has no problems if W chipset has problems, and it is on 125W preset, then problem is processor itself not how people use it edit: sometimes disabling e-cores helps, when e-core to cache connectivity is fried, that is, so it's more like 25% chance you will get problems in next 6 months no matter what
@@evildarkeevildark5943 Word on the street is that all 13th and 14th gen cpus have the issue and will eventually be unstable but it does seem like the i3s and i5s will be old by the time that happens. i7s are a bit iffy right now but im sure in the next year or so we will see how well they hold up.
Finally this is getting real traction. I thought I was going nuts with this 14900k. I can't push past 5.5Ghz no matter how much voltage I push to it. Doesn't get hotter than 70C at 5.5 with the proper voltage and no crashing.
It's probably multi layered problem, and the company has shareholders and silicon design competitors what do you expect, them saying all the case details just like that?
Need to keep it swept under a rug until arrow lake launches to keep selling as many raptor lake cpus as possible. When arrow lake launches they can declare raptor lake defective and tell everyone to buy arrow lake as a replacement.
So glad I went team Red this time. I've been an Intel guy my whole life. The introduction of Ryzen, combined with stuff like this, has swayed my opinion over time. 🤷♂
@@HoldinContempt level1 was saying the data centers are seeing these chips dying in workstation hardware. 0 overclocking/volting. 50:50 chance that some part of it is failing. some its 1 core, others its the imc.
@@Azureskies01rumor is that Arrow lake is going to be on Intel 20A, which is three nodes ahead of Intel 7, with Intel 4 and Intel 3 in between. And allegedly TSMC has said they expect Intel 20A/18A to be a N3 competitor. Five nodes in four years baby!
Yeah, but if I recall correctly it wasn't about stability but I/O and latency issues in demanding scenarios that he chased down. Nevertheless, there seem to be multiple hardware bugs, design flaws or BIOS/firmware issues at play here. As I've just recently bought a 14700KF myself, I am worried. While I've seen some quirks, working around them yielded a fairly stable system so far. Fingers crossed that my sample belongs to the 50% that work fine. :)
@@seylaw Yeah but it wasn't even in demanding scenario's the Intel CPUs would lag out on a drag and drop, crap. Also your CPU might be fine now but there is the issue of CPUs from RPL degrading, especially the one with higher core counts, something to do with connections between the main dies and the i/o dies. I'd return it if I still could
@@kayk3639 While this is a plausible theory, we still need more evidence to be sure. It could also be a combination of several factors, e.g. the bending issue and QA issues. At least I use a contact frame from day 1 to be safe on that front. My problem is, my alternatives are limited as I want great gaming and high multi-core performance and want to keep using DDR4 RAM from a previous build to save costs. You can't get that combination from AMD for the great prices that I got my Intel gear for - 14700KF (339 EUR) and a NZXT N5 Z690 (109 EUR, both incl. VAT and shipping). AM4 is too old and performs rather poorly in newer games. And while I could get the 7800X3D for 339 EUR right now, AM5 mandates DDR5 RAM (100 EUR for 32 GB) and a decent motherboard would cost me 220 EUR. This makes the AM5 route simply not cost efficient enough while delivering slightly better gaming performance but significantly less productivity performance (which I need for code compilation tasks).
pat even stole bunch of amd engineer to help them design cpus , jim keller , raja kadouri , and many more ........well that didnt help intel atall . lol , looks like ex amd engneers planted bugs in intel cpus , hahahahahah
Oh yeah?!? Well here in Houston, Texas it's 3:30am, the temperature is 80 (26.7 in commie units), the relative humidity is 85% and we've just had a hurricane. So it looks like our weather is just a whole lot better than yours! >:-(
same here across the channel in the Netherlands. record breaking rains all winter and it hasn't really stopped since.... also way too cold for mid July, had like 2 days of summer so far....
As an AMD adherent, I just want to tell Intel: Get your act together. I don't want AMD to be the only game in town, because I know they'll behave just like Intel did when _they_ were.
@@richardsmith9615 AMD is just as crappy as intel when it comes to shady business tactics. don't kid yourself just because the other isn't doing as poorly. they are both sharks swimming in the same pond. AMD has been pushing shady licensing practices as of late.
@@jm67x Nope. An ocean going animal being wet is hardly extraordinary. First line of the Wikipedia entry for 'Squib (explosive)': "A squib is a miniature explosive device used in a wide range of industries, from special effects to military applications." 'Ere in't north o' England, t' phrase means sommut like _going off like a wet firework_ . Or t' opposite o' _keeping your powder dry_ .
The fact that they're talking about a new release of CPUs while their current re-release of CPUs (just renamed 13000 series) are broken and people are wondering if they'll even get their money back or a replacement... Amazing.
That alone is scary, makes you wonder how many other game companies have banned players for cheating that may have just been caused by hardware issues. If I was them I'd be looking into logs if they have them as to what CPU they may have been running.
The great tragedy here is userbenchmark! They will either spiral down in grief or their denial might grow so large as to consume whats left of their logic circuits!
@@user-ol9zd1zy4xyup, needs to be a total recall. The cpus are defective period. Beating around the bush and blaming everything else is not going to change that.
Netherlands here, what is this "sun" people speak of? Isn't that that orange disc in the sky I see rising every morning, only for it to dissapear a few hours later?
ya know people, AMD is very much an option....im actually surprised anyone would go with Intel at this current time for anything, Epyc for servers, Threadripper for workstations and 7800X3D for gaming and all the super powerfull small stuff for handhelds....where does Intel even come into the picture atm?
The reason I went Intel was because it’s a laptop and these last few generations with ecores Intel pulled a uno reverse card and where before AMD had the lead in laptops with the first 8core/16thread laptop parts, now Intel is competing against that with 32 thread parts, and as someone who was coming from a multithreading starved 4core/4thread i5, 32 threads is intoxicating. Also pretty sure that Intel had a lead in single threaded performance or 1% lows or something *in the laptop segment* , quick sync, and thunderbolt all for what was supposed to only be a trade off of 2 hours of battery life (8 hours for AMD vs what was supposed to be 5-6 hours for this gen Intel) it seemed the better deal. Definitely feeling a little burned now though.
@@levygaming3133 Obviously it was your choice but I couldn't imagine buying an Intel laptop since 9/11th gen. Intel has innovated nothing since and they have done naught but pump power to the hungry CPUs for minimal gains. For a laptop, this inefficiency has translated to ridiculous heat transfer. IDK how people continue to buy Intel knowing that their CPUs need almost 3x the power to compete, particularly on a battery powered machine.
@@davide4725 I mean it wasn’t that much more inefficient according to the reviews though. The Intel laptop got 5 or 6 hours of video playback depending on the reviewer whereas the competing AMD chip got 8. Ideally 2 hours for twice as many threads seemed like an easy decision. Also this was mobile, before the x3d “laptops” were a thing, and AMD has reduced cache on their normal laptop chips. And so if I remember correctly, Intel beats non-X3D chips and X3D beats Intel. And so when you then reduce the cache even further, I seem to remember Intel comparing quite favorably. I didn’t just blindly buy Intel because “I only trust Intel because it’s all I’ve ever used”, I did actually put a lot of research into this and actively bought it in spite of my previous Intel CPU. Also because the laptop that made the most sense for me ultimately didn’t (and still doesn’t) have an AMD equivalent option. Edit: you’ve been very polite, I just take issue with “Intel has not innovated” and especially saying Intel hasn’t innovated since just before the last time they actually innovated. I had a skylake CPU without hyper threading from back when Intel wanted to pretend that 4 cores aught to be enough for anybody, and just like Ryzen forced Intel to actually compete and stop gatekeeping hyper threading, E cores have been a game changer and while even with the Ecores Intel still can’t beat either of the Ryzen 9 CPUs on desktop, in laptops where Ryzen 9 still means an 8 core 16 thread part with either one half or maybe even 1/4 the L3 cache of the desktop parts, the ecores are something that AMDs mobile parts don’t really have an answer to yet. (I know rumors are AMD has something for that but that’s still very much TBD.)
The nail in the coffin Intel needs. I was thinking of purchasing a 14900k to give a last breathe to my mobo.Fuck it, i'll wait to see if AMD comes up with a 9800x3d...
They already said the X3D 9000 series is coming, sometime after the launch of the vanilla chips. Supposedly they have made a lot of innovations in how the X3D works so it should be even more impressive than it has been on the 5000 and 7000 series CPUs. Intel is a joke.
@@kramnull8962 not at all. Non X3D is a cheaper alternative but still far better than anything Intel has on offer. Look at the latest benchmarks of the 9950X… 40% faster than a 14900K. Imagine the X3D versions…
@@mattspeer01 Same thing was said before the launch of the 7xxx as well. Here's a statement about what happened then. @ZeroB4NG 4 hours ago welp, seems i picked the perfect time to jump from Intel to AMD when i bought into the 7800X3D hype instead of just the next "boring but reliable"-Intel... not so reliable anymore it seems. I mean my Asus AM5 board had trouble booting with the first DDR5 kit i bought and i ended up buying another Kit, which sucked with the whole bios updates mess with burning up CPUs and boards and all that, but ... oh well. 1 Reply
@@reignxcv2960 Which motherboard designs? You mean W680 and Z680? They don't seem to have a ton in common, so that the issue occurs with server-grade hardware also seems to suggest that the issue is deeper than e.g. power limits.
I don't know why anyone bought 13th or 14th gen in the first place, even before these issues arose. AMD has been better in basically all regards - heat, efficiency, platform longevity, performance. And now those intel users can't even get stable systems with lower clocks and performance than promised. I feel for these people who basically got scammed.
@@webtiger1974PTGthat’s a bit excessive. Intel does still have some niches this generation. For example if you look up comparaisons of the 7800 and 7800x3d vs i7’s you’ll see people recommending that it boils down to X3D for gaming and i7 for productivity. Similarly in laptops there is a major hole in AMDs lineup that i9s fill. The i9 (mobiles) have more multithreading performance than AMDs 8 core 16 thread monolithic chips like the 6900hx - 7740hs - 8740hs for a modest hit to battery life without completely sacrificing battery life like the 7950hx3d and it’s 100 minutes or less battery life. Of course, that all assumes that the parts work and don’t fail, which it’s looking like isn’t exactly a guarantee.
@@webtiger1974PTG It makes very little sense to me tbh. I used to love Intel but after Zen 2 and 3s improvements there's no case (for consumer desktops) where it is worth buying Intel. With sockets lasting 2 years max, 300W+ TDPs needing insane cooling solutions and now these issues, I just don't understand how people can continue to ignore the writing on the wall.
That’s what happens when you turn a brand into a god, even when people saw Intel chips were no longer the best they keep buying, after years of high prices, customer abuse, high heat and now failing components. They love it, how many pc builds do you see where they are sticking Intel chips in them it’s hilarious 🤣🤣🤣.
I must be so lucky that I should play the Lotto because I have a 13900ks and a 13700k for my son and no problems for the past 1.5 years almost. My buddy has a 13900k and had no problems either.
Maybe you are, I hope so. It seems like degradation based on thermals, the more you use the computer the higher the likelihood over time of it breaking down.
My 14900k bought end of December 23 first seemed okay, besides some "Status access violations" every now and then in Chrome. In March became worse with random applications crashing, basically nothing remained open. Tried several bios versions and settings, lot of time wasted. Sent it back to my retailer and got a new one the same day. My temps are super low because of custom loop, so that's not the issue. The new one has been working fine so far. Has got better silicon rating according to the Asus uefi as well. Hopefully won't have to exchange it every 3 months.
built my first pc ever last summer, really glad I stay with the 12th gen i7 and didn't move to the 13th or 14th gen when I built hubbies a few months later
I use a 13900K and haven't had any issues yet, but I haven't updated my bios or motherboard drivers or anything and I only run my cpu at 5.1ghz and I've ran it in manual mode since day 1, since I never trusted motherboard manufacturers to apply a safe setting out of the box... fingers crossed it doesn't have any issues.
Hi Joe & Paul! Thanks again for the video! I have a suggestion: Please add a "cool tech product or story" in the Tech Briefs! It would a great way for me to learn about cool stuff in the tech world. Okay thanks again!
South of Houston, Texas -- 6 inches (152mm) of rain this month and 30 inches (762mm) of rain this year. Actually, add 4 inches (101mm) to both those figures. The NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) rain gauge I used broke during the hurricane. Mud, mosquitos and humidity -- it's been a heck of a year. Stay dry and enjoy the cool for me. ;-)
My 14900k lasted 2 weeks before I had severe wonkiness failed to extract nvidia drivers, failing to install software and video out of memory issues (no hard crashes) sent for RMA and replacement touch wood seems to be working
I've had no issues with my 14900K gaming build from months ago. Hopefully that continues to function as per normal. I don't recall anyone mentioning the average length of time when the degradation started occurring. Guess I'll have to read some articles.
@@soccersensation actually if you read and normalize wendel data its closer to 99% percent and some game dev event said it was 100%, event if its “only” 50% its really really big failure rate, if i was you, i will demand return and will just buy 12th gen or change to amd
My 13700k / 4090 build has been flawless for almost 2 years now. Started on Z790 ddr4 msi tomahawk then switched over to the ddr5 msi tomahawk months later when it was released. Contact frame since day one as well. 13700k oc to 5.6ghz on all 8 p cores, All 8 E core oc to 4.4ghz, Ring oc to 5.0ghz at 1.34v. Even the mem controller has been very solid. 32g.b Corsair rgb vengeance 6400 cl32 hynix A-Die oc to 7200 34-41-41-83 at 1.45v. On a msi z790 tomahawk. I use my system everyday 7 days a week for over 8 hours a day for work / gaming. I can't complain.
Done with Intel. Ryzen and Radeon for my gaming needs and Mac for work. For my gaming needs Radeon cards are more than enough and decently priced unlike GimpVidea...I know they rule in AI but for my limited use cases like messing around occasionally in SD a 3060 is enough. It's 2024, I don't want my computer eating more power than my circular saw, why should I want that? Why should I be forced to use a car's engine radiator to cool down a stupid CPU in 2024? Why should I have to deal with stability issues and hardware failures after paying top dollar for this shite? Screw them. Time for these companies to take the some L's as usually it's only us, the consumers taking L's.
So if you were running AMD last year and your chip caught fire you'd have the same attitude toward them that you now do toward Intel. This isn't a company issue - it's a corporate vs consumer issue. Playing cheerleader for brands doesn't protect us consumers from those brands shitting on us. Think about it.
@@MadBlazer89 I'm saying brands don't matter, it's all corporations screwing us. It's Intel now, it was AMD before, it's gonna be AMD again later, then Intel after that. Get it? Stop fanboying corporations.
The problem seems to be in the memory controller. For some reason it seems to run hotter than everything else. A lot hotter. Delidded a CPU and looked at it at standby power and the memory controller was a hotspot even with the CPU not doing anything. The IR video showed it hotter than anything else and that appears to match at least most of the symptoms.
Guess I got lucky and instead of going with a 13th gen i9 when I wanted to upgrade I decided to go 11900k because at the time microcenter was selling a combo deal of cpu high end msi z590 mobo and 64gb ram for $380. It's far more cpu than I need and an added perk is that the 11900k has a super low system latency which games love along with the very strong single core performance. I'll be good for years to come.
The Nvidia report months ago about Intel CPUs crashing their code has been vindicated too. Intel has some serious questions to answer about the bad SKUs.
I got the Gigabyte Z790 AORUS MASTER motherboard with 13900K which I hope will last 10+ years like the 3770K did. And 96GB DDR5 RAM and 4TB SSD + older 6TB HDD. Still rocking the MSI Seahawk 1080 TI GPU. And the P500A case. Though if the temperatures of CPU and GPU any get hotter, I might need actively cooled custom water cooling. Running AI image enlargement had the water cooled GPU hitting at nearly 100C running at 90C with the best fan setting.
Luckily, I have no problems with my 13900K. Though it is is underclocked (5.0 max turbo on all cores), mainly because I try to lower the heat output (I'm in a small room wit 8 computers and it gets hot). But I also caught the wind of Gigabyte power shenanigans right after buying the hardware so it was underclocked and power limits were set to Intel's specs from the very beginning. I wonder then if that prevented any possible degradation that other users may be having? Dodged a bullet?
This is one of those few moments when you're glad you don't have the money to buy these high-end products. After so many years of trusting Intel I am tremendously disappointed with this news. I still have hope that in the next generation this will become a turning point.
Same, I'm on DDR4 though. Still beat 7800x3d when it should in balanced power plan. Power save a better R23 score of 18900. Not in gaming of course. But work. 30K is my max without a better cooler. When you are on a 6800xt there is way more advantage to FPS limiting and saving 125w of GPU usage, that the actual power draw of the 13700k isn't bad at all. Still loving those package 4W average idle usage, after hours on end.
My 13700k / 4090 build has been flawless for almost 2 years now. Started on Z790 ddr4 msi tomahawk then switched over to the ddr5 msi z790 tomahawk months later when it was released. Contact frame since day one as well. 13700k oc to 5.6ghz on all 8 p cores, All 8 E core oc to 4.4ghz, Ring oc to 5.0ghz at 1.34v. Even the mem controller has been very solid. 32g.b Corsair rgb vengeance 6400 cl32 hynix A-Die oc to 7200 34-41-41-83 at 1.45v. On a msi z790 tomahawk. I use my system everyday 7 days a week for over 8 hours a day for work / gaming. I can't complain.
I've had mine for about a year, no problems yet... *knocks on wood* But I have seen reports of 13700k CPUs also having issues, unfortunately.
Месяц назад
Rarely game but use my i9-13900KF system mostly for photo processing and video, typically experience a crash every three weeks for no apparent reason. Sometimes I get a cluster of crashes (3 or less) but then good business for thee to four weeks. This is the most crash prone system I've ever owned regardless of processor used.
Intel have lost me this year after nearly 20 years. I will run my 13600kf till I decide to upgrade but next upgrade will be an amd x3d chip of some description. I was hoping to go 14700k at some point to keep upgrade cost down but I wouldn’t touch it with a barge pole now. My trust is lost.
I am so glad that I chose x670e platform instead of Z790. I honestly had some issues and regretted not getting Intel while using some programs that would utilize Intel iGPU acceleration.
I have a i7-13700K set to 153W and Tjmax set to 70°C (and disable most of the extra boosting technology). I was concerned about silicon degradation of these high wattage CPUs (I keep mine a long time e.g 25 years), but they should never have been clocked this high as default
9700x only 65watts TDP! I'm liking it. Most of the performance but at an easy to cool wattage. (I always build for maximum reliability over absolute top end performance) so that one seems interesting to me.
My 13900K has crashed once that I know off, maybe after some update. I have never played any game with it. I did try to get a Gigabyte 4080 graphics card with this system including a Gigabyte motherboard. Never was able to make it work, I sent it back to Gigabyte at great shipping expense and they sent it right back to me with a new cable but didn't touch the card that I could tell. And it still didn't work. After pulling the card, I had to reboot over 10 times to get it to boot and reset the bios plus whatever I could think of. I put my RX580 back into it and no problems since. Still have the 4080 which is still under warranty but Gigabyte didn't even look at it.
I have a 13900K. I noticed some weird behavior starting a couple months back where over time my memory usage would creep up while idle. A restart would lower it back down. I thought I had a memory leak that I couldn't nail down so I reformatted 2 weeks ago. All was good for the first week or so. But a couple days ago I noticed that I think its starting to do it again. I was thinking it was related the Gigabyte Command Center (GCC) software. But now I'm not so sure. The worst thing is, its very hard to be certain that its a CPU issue and not a software, motherboard or RAM issue.
I'm glad when I was getting ready to build my new PC last year, the 7800X3D came out with glowing reviews as I was about to pull the trigger on a 13900K system, and luckily the mobo issues came to the surface and were patched in the days after I ordered the mobo so luckily I got the patched bios on day one (though ASUS were sneaky about it claiming that you weren't covered by the warranty if you used the bios to fix the f'up they were responsible for) . Not only that, but the money I saved got me more ram and the extra I needed for a steam deck, so win win win it seems.
Id like to thank central air for keeping my house a nice 62 (16ish c) degrees during the heat wave. Would hate for my amd cpu to mimic intel temps without it
i do have a feeling Nvidia's new product market prices are about to get very low by the last quarter. Great video, again. your sarcasm in every intro has me rollin everytime.
Месяц назад
I remember a few years ago Intel patented self-degrading/recycling CPUs. I see they implemented it finally.
My first 14900K became so unstable after less than 2 months it was basically unusable. They honored the warranty, and sent me an RMA replacement, but it was a slightly annoying hassle. Took over a month to get it, which I figured, so I bought a second 14900K to keep my PC up and running, and it's been a night and day difference. Now I have a brand new, factory-sealed 14900K that I will probably sell to try and recoup some of the money from buying the second chip. Oh yeah, and it was unstable with all the power limits set to Intel factory.
This feels vaguely similar to the nVidia power connector melting problem that just won't go away no matter how much the issue is talked about. Wonder if it's something to do with the e-core / p-core decision making that sometimes just bamboozles Windows into confusion and the wrong choice. Would be interesting to see the OS behind the crashes in a similar pie chart. BTW the "thumbs up" like insert was a bit of a shock. I'm watching this pre-watershed, and was not expecting... that. I laughed once I got over the shock.