“Migrants Are NOT On Benefits!” | Mike Graham Clashes With Immigration Lawyer 

Why they have this Muslim lawyer on ..he getting rich defending immigrants

@@angelamary9493 he’s a christian.

If they were only entitled to claim a fixed amount and only 1 claim per illegal, they’d soon “drop” their clients. Robbing the taxpayers is all they’re good for 😡

He's telling the truth

How many would do it pro bono?

That's the tip of the iceberg. Billions more for all their lawyers, interpreters, houses, education, welfare, healthcare etc

You can't just walk into a jobcentres and go on benefits lol you have to be a British citizen or you have to have indefinite leave to remain to claim any sort of benefits

@@sfrancis7856 Whilst you're not wrong, couldn't it be argued that living in accommodation, being clothed, fed, given spending money, health and dental care, all courtesy of the hard-pressed taxpayer, who's wondering why they heck they bother, is - being in receipt of benefits?

​@@MisterHampshireto absolutely correct some people are to bloody thick to understand that

Tip of the iceberg mate that`s just accommodation factor in NHS, dentists dole or the equivalent, clothes, all white goods evry morsel they eat every single thing they buy, translator`s ,free bus cards, computers and internet i could go on we pay for everything

Scandal

Wish I could help😢

Omg that is awful I m gobsmacked

I totally understand your plight. My 54 year old daughter has severe health problems and has to sleep on my two seater couch. Was made homeless four years ago and told it may be another ten year wait for the same reason Migrants!!! She paid tax all her working life for this.

Disgusting 😢

Stop legal aid for these lawyers.

There doing a good job of screwing the legal aid system that's where they make there money, it's time legal aid was stopped for those illegal migrants,😮​@@susanmills4843

He is about coining it in he’s only interested in what he can get as well

Chasing ambulances

Coming from a man who shouldn't even be in this country they was never wanted and we wasn't asked

👍👏👏

I watched a video where they asked 2 of them what money they received. They said! If you live in a tent it's something like £98 a week, & if you stay in a hotel it's about £120. That plus all the meals cooked by a chef in the hotel & vouchers for other things. This Lawyer is talking absolute rubbish.

BULL..!!! It’s called ASYLUM, it’s what a civilisation does…!?! We have fallen from this status a very long time ago now..!?

Clarification for those that are triggered with the immigration policy. 2023 1.2 million people came to UK and 0.7 million left. This brings net migration to roughly 0.6 million. 90% are legal migrants this gives roughly 900,000 people. Of the 900,000 the vast majority are students about 600,000. The remaining are skilled workers- care workers, IT consultants, Engineers and accountants. The 900,000 immigrants are not allowed to claim benefits. On their visa stamp it clearly state “No recourse to public funds” . In addition, immigrants have to pay a NHS surchage, which is an accelarated contribution to NHS. So that they dont benefit unfairly from free health care. Also immigrants on non settlement visas cant get a social/council house, they rent privately. It is now common for private landlords to demand 1 year up front rent for immigrants (because they dont have credit history in country). The question the media gets wrong all the time is that government is not honest with the public. British people dont want to be IT consultants ; Acturial Scientists ; Engineers; Doctors; Accountants and Care Workers. In fact there is a 300,000 shortage of care workers in UK. We chave a young generation which lacks spine, grit and determination to do the hard work. The UK treasury knows it and its been explained to the PM that immigrants benefit to economy significantly outweigh their cost. British people need to make a choice. Stop immigration and being poorer or accept immigrants & have multiple cultures. The politicians will never say it out loud. Next PM will continue scape goating the immigrants!

@@user-qz1hy5mh4c BANG ON THE MONEY, Most Brits want to love and believe lies that’s how much greatness is left on the now sh1t covered island..!?! 🤣🤣🤭 this is how the tiny minded racist brain rot copes..!?! Believing absolute LIES..!?!

Exactly! They should be detained, they are ILLEGAL by definition! They are not asylum seekers.

Ye they’re all bloody foreigners

And over here.

He wouldn't admit it if he did

Me the same , never claimed anything in 74 years and I hate them giving my hard earned cash away

Tell your grand children to vote reform.

Too bad ..

Is there such a thing?

Lawyers simply follow the law, and make sure that people comply to it. Including the Government. It's their job.

Vote reforrm

Not sure why he keeps getting asked to speak on the show. Same thing every time

Wait until they all get together - they will overtake the lot of us. What is King Charles doing about this mess? After all it is supposed to be his country. Why the hell do we even need Royals anymore. They leech of this country just like the illegals do.

Plus £40 a week spending money 😮

No oneshould have to live in a mouldy house, but is he and his wife working to support his family and get better housing, or does he just thinkthecouncil needs to give hima house he finds suitable.?

And also why are they having more and more kids…It’s their own responsibility to find adequate housing for their ever expanding family. Work and feed your family without having to be on benefits.

​@annamissAnna They'll be fine when Liebour take over and scrap the 2 child benefit cap, then the tax payer can cough up loads of free money to them for all their kids ... and even encourage them to have more, especially the families of the demography that wants to take over the world with their prehistoric beliefs.

@@sandraowens4821the parents are to blame having 11 kids they can’t provide for. The entitlement to think you can just move country and breed like crazy and expect the tax payer to look after them. I don’t care if they both working full time they knew dam well they can’t afford 11 children

​@@sandraowens4821no he needs dumping back in Afghanistan that were he belongs not In Britain

Yes there was one with her huge sons who said they had to have a parking space

@@anneheard9381 ungrateful country shopping bellends

The entitlement is astounding. They also know how to play the system. Yet if a British citizen turned down that many places they would be kicked off the list. These foreign nationals know they are the priority and they’ll use that to the fullest extent they can.

@@thepolitewierdo freeloaders

I was homeless. After three months in a hostel, I was offered a choice of two places. I asked what would happen if they were not suitable and the reply was 'Then you're on your own. All we have to do is make two offers, and that's it.'

AI will decimate the existing workforce gimmegrants not needed

It is really the communist rights act because many of the laws were made by communists

Six months on that, they quit get universal credit then build mansion back in their own Country

Not at all. The Conservatives had the largest majority since 1987 in 2019. Jan 2010, David Cameron said net migration of over 200,000 was too much and promised to reduce net migration to "tens of thousands". Net immigration UK 2010-2021: 2.2m 2022: 764,000 2023: 686,000 764,000 + 686,000 = a net migration figure of 1.45m in the last two years. Total: 3.65m Today’s provisional estimates put immigration in 2023 at 1,218,000 and emigration at 532,000, giving a net figure of 686,000. Source: Migration Observatory Immigration remained unusually high in 2023, while visa data indicate further declines may come in 2024 23 MAY 2024 The Conservatives have let in a net figure of 3.65m since they came to power. *** Facebook claims that Sir Keir Starmer took the government to court in 2003 to demand that “illegal immigrants” could receive hotel accommodation and benefit support. The post says: “For those wondering why ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS get benefits - read on:”. It then includes an image, with the following wording: “In 2003 the Labour party was taken to court by a lefty lawyer who demanded illegal immigrants get benefits he won the case and this laid the ground for todays scandal of hotel and benefits for illegal migrants the lefty lawyer who won the case was KEIR STARMER”. There are a number of inaccuracies in this post. While asylum seekers who may be at risk of destitution are provided with financial assistance and accommodation, including hotels, by the government, they are not allowed to apply for mainstream welfare benefits (for example Universal Credit) and therefore do not receive benefits. It is true that Mr Starmer, before he was an MP and Leader of the Opposition, represented five asylum seekers as a barrister in a case against the government. However the 2003 case Mr Starmer was involved in did not enable all “illegal immigrants” to receive support. The case challenged legislation introduced by the then-Labour government, which meant the Home Secretary could refuse support to asylum seekers who didn’t claim asylum as soon as they arrived in the country. The claimants Mr Starmer represented won the case as the judge ruled that the government couldn’t refuse support based on how soon after arrival an asylum claim was made. Asylum seekers received support from the government or local authorities for years before 2003. Source: Full Fact - Keir Starmer 2003 court case is not the reason asylum seekers get support 31 AUGUST 2023

@@FontaineDerby yes, but it was Starmer that began and fought the courts for migrants to be given benefits

@emmastyles6936 Facebook claims that Sir Keir Starmer took the government to court in 2003 to demand that “illegal immigrants” could receive hotel accommodation and benefit support. The post says: “For those wondering why ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS get benefits - read on:”. It then includes an image, with the following wording: “In 2003 the Labour party was taken to court by a lefty lawyer who demanded illegal immigrants get benefits he won the case and this laid the ground for todays scandal of hotel and benefits for illegal migrants the lefty lawyer who won the case was KEIR STARMER”. There are a number of inaccuracies in this post. While asylum seekers who may be at risk of destitution are provided with financial assistance and accommodation, including hotels, by the government, they are not allowed to apply for mainstream welfare benefits (for example Universal Credit) and therefore do not receive benefits. It is true that Mr Starmer, before he was an MP and Leader of the Opposition, represented five asylum seekers as a barrister in a case against the government. However the 2003 case Mr Starmer was involved in did not enable all “illegal immigrants” to receive support. The case challenged legislation introduced by the then-Labour government, which meant the Home Secretary could refuse support to asylum seekers who didn’t claim asylum as soon as they arrived in the country. The claimants Mr Starmer represented won the case as the judge ruled that the government couldn’t refuse support based on how soon after arrival an asylum claim was made. Asylum seekers received support from the government or local authorities for years before 2003.

@emmastyles6936 Facebook claims that Sir Keir Starmer took the government to court in 2003 to demand that “illegal immigrants” could receive hotel accommodation and benefit support. The post says: “For those wondering why ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS get benefits - read on:”. It then includes an image, with the following wording: “In 2003 the Labour party was taken to court by a lefty lawyer who demanded illegal immigrants get benefits he won the case and this laid the ground for todays scandal of hotel and benefits for illegal migrants the lefty lawyer who won the case was KEIR STARMER”. There are a number of inaccuracies in this post. While asylum seekers who may be at risk of destitution are provided with financial assistance and accommodation, including hotels, by the government, they are not allowed to apply for mainstream welfare benefits (for example Universal Credit) and therefore do not receive benefits. It is true that Mr Starmer, before he was an MP and Leader of the Opposition, represented five asylum seekers as a barrister in a case against the government. However the 2003 case Mr Starmer was involved in did not enable all “illegal immigrants” to receive support. The case challenged legislation introduced by the then-Labour government, which meant the Home Secretary could refuse support to asylum seekers who didn’t claim asylum as soon as they arrived in the country. The claimants Mr Starmer represented won the case as the judge ruled that the government couldn’t refuse support based on how soon after arrival an asylum claim was made. Asylum seekers received support from the government or local authorities for years before 2003. Source: Full Fact - Keir Starmer 2003 court case is not the reason asylum seekers get support 31 AUGUST 2023

@@Tigger-roo1234 See above.