As Zundamon says, this is a comedy, and the student is an immigrant who is equally ignorant of right and left in the United States. The word "oligarchy" has been used since ancient Greece. Monarchy is ruled by "one man", democracy is ruled by "the many", and oligarchy is ruled by "the few". The ruling side is "oligarchy", while the ruled side is "populism", which is becoming mainstream worldwide. Plato named the system of rule by the few ruled by the law "aristocracy", and the government not based on law "oligarchy". He defined oligarchy as "government based on the evaluation of property", and in an oligarchy, virtue is ignored, and in effect, the rich and the poor are in conflict within a country. Aristotle also defined oligarchy as not "simply rule by the few" but "when the wealthy hold the power of control." This is a corrupt form of aristocracy, and is also politics carried out by a small wealthy class for their own benefit. During the Renaissance, the rule of the Medici family in Florence is famous. German sociologist Robert Michels (1876-1936) described "the tendency for power to become concentrated in the hands of a few not only in nations but also in companies, political parties and all other organizations," and called this the "iron law of minority rule." In "Sociology of Political Parties" (1911), he showed through his analysis of German and Italian Social Democratic parties that "any democratic organization inevitably transforms into minority rule as it grows in size." The United States is a country with a history of immigration only. It is a country where ethnic groups do not blend together to form an "American ethnicity" within a single country, but where each ethnic community asserts its own values and culture. In the past, there were several ways to "unify" these multiple ethnic groups into a single ethnic group, and these methods have barely maintained the multiple ethnic groups as a unit called "American citizens." It is already a clear fact that immigrants who have entered the United States legally do not become defenders of the United States and its people, but tend to defend immigrants who are scheduled to enter in the future. Doesn't this mean that "immigrant consciousness" is in conflict with "national consciousness"? Whether legal or illegal, once they enter the United States, they seek the same standard of living as citizens, not a life based on "detention facilities," "soup kitchens," or "charitable donations." That is the very reason why immigrants move to the United States. Immigrants want to become American citizens in the United States, but at the same time, since they don't know anything about American education, culture, history, or manners, it's only natural that they would want to create a "little homeland." But what's strange is that both immigrants and those who support them want to spend American tax money and are satisfied with donations from the "minority" of wealthy people. And they view wealthy conservatives as their enemy, but not wealthy leftists.
