No need for speculation. Must be him. The jury sucked, too many sympathetic females, ignoring the agony of the dead and families. Was it necessary to have video to prove the defendant to be guilty. There were kind of objective evidences. If one wipes out DNA and dumps the weapon, one cannot be proved to be guilty?
He is guilty definitely. 1) Why was he sleeping over at his friends on the night of the murder and not go back home? 2) Why would the owner’s wallet be in his room? 3) He should have known his gf was pregnant a head of time. Buying a plane ticket right after the murder makes no sense. 4) If the relationship between the defendant and the victim was good, there would not have been a need to terminate his contract.
其实除了那些寻仇杀人(现今也不多),我相信是身边人干的。两人没有仇家、没欠人钱,生活规律,应该也不会遇到随机杀人的人吧。。。最大可疑不是男佣,难道还有谁?正如李昌钰先生说:always the husband! 意思不只是指丈夫是凶手,其实是身边的人。谁料疑点利益归于被告。天知,天知,他知,两夫妇知。
He is definitely guilty. He had the motive, the opportunity and the need to murder. He owed a large sum to the loan sharks. The prosecutor most probably inexperienced. Conviction can be based on circunstantial evidence. That guy fits the character of a real bastard without mirak standards, a sociopath and a real trouble maker for anyone he meets to benefit his interests or to give him money.