【新聞挖挖哇】台積電摧毀婚姻？鄭弘儀套話名律師笑翻全場！拜託「老婆大人」求求你放過我！夫妻感情愛牽拖的那個人？20240627｜來賓：馬在勤、欣西亞、黃志強、潘建志、VIVI、 

台積電300多 是武漢肺炎之前一兩年的事..

錢要跟誰不是自己決定的 喜歡看到馬律師上節目

每次覺得不知這個醫生是在說什麼，就選擇到他都快轉😅😅😅

潘醫生雖是心理專科、言論激動、主觀。

我的先生是一種⋯忌妒老婆的能幹，自己認為自己被老婆⋯⋯壓鎮。我說的邏輯他都會很（蕃）的回應。可能我是傳統客家女性⋯服從⋯低聲。 結果還是我的邏輯都對的，我如果（吐臭）他的時候，他回應我說⋯⋯那是妳沒有那個命。 回應的話，都會另人想ㄧ巴掌打過去。 已有好幾項事件了。

是的

Zhi chiang very good 😂😂😂😂😂😂

😇😇😇👏👏👏

生死有命富貴在天～～台積電150時同學跟我說有錢的話⋯可以多買幾張～～我沒買～～現在1000多～說真的我也無感～～因為以前我投資股票都賠錢～後來決定平安即是福～～

這些來賓有些人的老婆或先生真的人在福中不知福😢、署立師你也真可憐顧家疼老婆賺那麼多錢給老婆花😡你老婆還嫌你晚下班！晚一點下班生氣😭😢、扯叫蘇律師去當作業員！真是不公平人在福中不知福得寸進尺看在我們這些眼裡真的倒胃口！還有幾年都不回公婆家看一下得有夠扯爆😢爸媽怎麼教育阿、一年回去幾次不會少塊肉探望老人家也不會死

西亞今天好美🎉

明天股市不是漲就是跌...😀😃😄🥰👏👏👏

那件社會新聞敘述有錯，陳先生不是殺了人要跑，而是準備要毀他前妻容的時候被死者邱先生的兒子擋下，前妻趁亂逃跑他要去追沒追到才跑回汽車旅館裡面；據陳先生家人鄰居說他沒打過他前妻，反而是沒離婚前前妻很揮霍，會得到家暴提告是因為他生氣推了他前妻，而且陳滄暗渡是邱先生家人都知道的事；兩個男的都死了，他前妻就可以無限渲染。 雖然情理法是情在前，殺人也是錯的決定，但陳述事實應是找出真相為主，不能隨意呼嚨也應站在道德至高點隨意評論，這點馬律師的專業度跟知識水準真的比另一個高很多。

買房子，存銀行是最安全的投資

誰會知道台積電漲成這樣？

我黃金太早賣，也是被駡到臭頭

😮

BBC lifestyle 節目更優

這個沒看過路人伯伯是？現在素人很常上節目

女股神他也娶不到。這種心態的男女都有。

太過分了，應該找一個很好家教的人，這樣的女人貼大床都不能要。

這位黃姓來賓近來常上挖挖哇，他舉的例子水準都有待商榷，說話時間也少。不知製作單位請這位嘉賓的用意?

潘醫師講的很大義凜然，我不信他遇到老婆外遇時會這麼冷靜。 我想大部分的人都很難接受。(不過不代表要報復就是)

懟是中國用語...我們台灣人都用嗆回去...🥰🥰🥰👏👏👏

新聞挖挖哇 - 20240627 (1 = very bad, 2 = not good, 3 = average, 4 = above average, 5 = very good) 1. Content and Topics (3 = average) : - no real main topic today, the show start with story sharing and guess talking things related to the story/sub topic, the usual "mix salad" episode. 2. Interview Quality (3 = average) : - is good, at least entertaining. All guest was given sufficient time to talk, and the host did not chip in unnecessarily when guest is talking. 3. Pacing and Structure (4 = above average) : - even thou is mix topic, but is well paced and structured. Overall pacing is pleasant when watch. Kudos to the person that plan this. 4. Host/Guest Interaction (4 = above average) : - good interaction between host and guess, good interaction between guest too. Overall chemistry is good. 5. Production Quality (3 = average) : - standard 新聞挖挖哇 production quality, is ok. My only complain is the camera shot keep changing way too frequent and unnecessarily, which really break the immersion when watching, very annoying. Example, instead of stay on the person that talk, i know that they will change camera view to make it less boring, but at some part of the show, there was like 4 - 5 camera changes, from one person to another in less then few seconds!!!! What is this????? Why are you doing this ??? Why the heck you even think this is a good idea??? 6. Entertainment Value (4 = above average) : - This episode is ok in terms of this, definitely much better than the previous episode - 20240626. 7. Consistency and Reliability (4 = above average) : - Solid. Guest are well equipped and prepare with required knowledge and stories. 8. Host and Guest Expertise (4 = above average) : - Host perform as usual, at some part the host's response is kinda boring but is ok. Good and interesting story shared by the guest too. 9. Overall Impression/Personal thoughts (3 = average): - An episode that serve no purpose. While it did provide some interesting knowledge or insight, this episode is more to entertainment. Good to be watch when eating or drinking something, preferably with a beer.

主持人的笑話很難笑

我覺得這個精神科醫師只在秀自己的的專業，問答都沒到點，而且他的論述是一般人動動腦、看網路報章雜誌就可得知。